@PacArtCollect going full unbounded while destroying decentralization as opposed to increasing slowly with growth over time doesn't seem like a very Satoshi thing to do
@PacArtCollect now this isn't all to say it wasn't something he saw down the line, nor that terra node isn't a way Bitcoin scales, that may very well be great however
peoples interpretation of the original design and what it was supposed to be used for are quite differing how it's turned out
@PacArtCollect a centralized federation, making the rules, determining the fee minimums and cost of doing business is not peer to peer digital cash for the world
not having the ability to protect your privacy by running transactions through your own soft + hardware i.e your own node is not p2p
@PacArtCollect no one is going out of their way to negotiate a contract not little timmy with his $5 in satoshis who can't even remember his seed phrase
not to mention the hours of waiting around for smaller miners to hit a block so would probably only work as a federation anyway
@PacArtCollect only practically because the coin price is $14 as opposed to $60,000 the base mempool fees are the same
a work around could be a wallet or many which has the option flag to select when sending a transaction to a coalition of miners with a lower or no fee and bypass the others
one way in but there isn't a way out the cycle just continues round and round about
unless someone can free you but it's their choice not yours doesn't matter how much you beg forever on all fours
it's collective judgement, everyone or none at all
All Rise or together Fall