Viki13

@VB_Viki13

#13 #GME #BBBY #AMC #IEP #CHEWY Investing for freedom and my family's future 🤍 !

Marss

Joined January 2022

4.5K Following

2K Followers

2.7K Posts

VB_Viki13 retweeted

almost 2 years ago

friends, I feel confident that we have solved the mystery of RC's co-debtor status with $BBBY. looking back at old posts is fun and very neat to see the threads we were pulling on. as always, looking back at older documentation is invaluable, especially with new understanding. I find it very funny that it was there the entire time, we just had to look. admittedly, it does help to have a better understanding as we go along as well. in the case of #BBBY, I believe that RC is a co-debtor because he is a cosigner/offered a guaranty on $BBBYQ's Texas Tax obligations. let's start back in May: RC himself and RC Ventures (alongside JP Morgan Securities and Sue Gove) are listed in docket 568 as co-debtors for a handful of places and I've picked this page as an example. the creditor is the City of Tyler and look at the Schedule, E/F—that's important. if we read through the 1,176 page docket we can find the E/F Schedule, here's a page: here we have our first aha! moment. this section of the Schedule is titled Taxing Authorities and it is here that we find the cities where RC is listed as the co-debtor. note: some cities are listed twice, once under the Taxing Authorities and then again under Trade Payables (i.e. for the City of Tyler, this is where the utility water bill is located). I know, taxes are boring but hang in there, here's where it gets fun. back in September when the Kirkland August fee statement came out, this would have been a very easy detail to miss: but in fact, it was likely the largest confirmation of RC's involvement in all public disclosures—but, only if you knew what you were looking at. first, what is a non-debtor party? a "non-debtor party" or"non-debtor third party" refers to an individual or entity that is not a party to the bankruptcy case but is nonetheless affected by or involved in the bankruptcy proceedings. you guessed it, like a co-debtor. so, now that we know what a non-debtor is, we can ask the really important question: WHY is Kirkland preparing Bed Bath tax determinations for someone who is not the Company? remember, a non-debtor is not a party to the Chapter 11 case, so this is not referring to Bed Bath or any of its subsidiary entities. also worth noting is when Ms. Geier is documenting this work in the Kirkland fee—on August 29, three days before the end of the voting on the plan. this is not something she would be working on "that maybe would not come to fruition." now, let's set up a quick timeline: May 30—RC is revealed as a co-debtor. August 29—Ms. Geier is preparing the Texas taxes for (I believe) RC. September 12—was the Confirmation Hearing for the #BBBYQ Chapter 11 Plan. September 14—the Plan is confirmed. on September 14—after the confirmation—we get docket 2172. why after? because they can give some more disclosure (while still being light on details) since they know the Plan can be effectuated. look what we find inside: in case you did not know (like me!) what the Texas Comptroller was: "The Texas Comptroller's office is the state's chief tax collector, accountant, revenue estimator and treasurer." emphasis mine. so: • they are the main tax collector for Texas, one of the two main states where RC is listed as a co-debtor (the other being California),.. • and the findings of fact to support the Plan states that their rights are not preserved to pursue any non-debtor third party for tax debts,.. • and the co-debtor counterparties to RC are taxing authorities. well, would you look at that. — Ryan Cohen, you sneaky fox. gosh, that sure gives me a new perspective on why RC is not buying any $GME, as this would give credibility to the theory that he is under a material info blackout period. it could also explain why the #GME investment policy has not been utilized yet, which could also explain why Mr. Attal is also not able to purchase, since he may be on the oversight committee. and yes, I believe that RC is one side of the "third party release." more on that, soon.

jake2b's tweet photo. friends, I feel confident that we have solved the mystery of RC's co-debtor status with $BBBY. looking back at old posts is fun and very neat to see the threads we were pulling on.

as always, looking back at older documentation is invaluable, especially with new understanding. I find it very funny that it was there the entire time, we just had to look. admittedly, it does help to have a better understanding as we go along as well.

in the case of #BBBY, I believe that RC is a co-debtor because he is a cosigner/offered a guaranty on $BBBYQ's Texas Tax obligations. let's start back in May:
RC himself and RC Ventures (alongside JP Morgan Securities and Sue Gove) are listed in docket 568 as co-debtors for a handful of places and I've picked this page as an example. the creditor is the City of Tyler and look at the Schedule, E/F—that's important.

if we read through the 1,176 page docket we can find the E/F Schedule, here's a page:
here we have our first aha! moment. this section of the Schedule is titled Taxing Authorities and it is here that we find the cities where RC is listed as the co-debtor.

note: some cities are listed twice, once under the Taxing Authorities and then again under Trade Payables (i.e. for the City of Tyler, this is where the utility water bill is located).

I know, taxes are boring but hang in there, here's where it gets fun.

back in September when the Kirkland August fee statement came out, this would have been a very easy detail to miss:
but in fact, it was likely the largest confirmation of RC's involvement in all public disclosures—but, only if you knew what you were looking at.

first, what is a non-debtor party?

a "non-debtor party" or"non-debtor third party" refers to an individual or entity that is not a party to the bankruptcy case but is nonetheless affected by or involved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

you guessed it, like a co-debtor. so, now that we know what a non-debtor is, we can ask the really important question:

WHY is Kirkland preparing Bed Bath tax determinations for someone who is not the Company?

remember, a non-debtor is not a party to the Chapter 11 case, so this is not referring to Bed Bath or any of its subsidiary entities.

also worth noting is when Ms. Geier is documenting this work in the Kirkland fee—on August 29, three days before the end of the voting on the plan. this is not something she would be working on "that maybe would not come to fruition."

now, let's set up a quick timeline:

May 30—RC is revealed as a co-debtor.
August 29—Ms. Geier is preparing the Texas taxes for (I believe) RC.
September 12—was the Confirmation Hearing for the #BBBYQ Chapter 11 Plan.
September 14—the Plan is confirmed.

on September 14—after the confirmation—we get docket 2172. why after? because they can give some more disclosure (while still being light on details) since they know the Plan can be effectuated.

look what we find inside:
in case you did not know (like me!) what the Texas Comptroller was:

"The Texas Comptroller's office is the state's chief tax collector, accountant, revenue estimator and treasurer."

emphasis mine.

so:

• they are the main tax collector for Texas, one of the two main states where RC is listed as a co-debtor (the other being California),..

• and the findings of fact to support the Plan states that their rights are not preserved to pursue any non-debtor third party for tax debts,..

• and the co-debtor counterparties to RC are taxing authorities.

well, would you look at that.

—

Ryan Cohen, you sneaky fox.

gosh, that sure gives me a new perspective on why RC is not buying any $GME, as this would give credibility to the theory that he is under a material info blackout period.

it could also explain why the #GME investment policy has not been utilized yet, which could also explain why Mr. Attal is also not able to purchase, since he may be on the oversight committee.

and yes, I believe that RC is one side of the "third party release." more on that, soon.

jake2b's tweet photo. friends, I feel confident that we have solved the mystery of RC's co-debtor status with $BBBY. looking back at old posts is fun and very neat to see the threads we were pulling on.

as always, looking back at older documentation is invaluable, especially with new understanding. I find it very funny that it was there the entire time, we just had to look. admittedly, it does help to have a better understanding as we go along as well.

in the case of #BBBY, I believe that RC is a co-debtor because he is a cosigner/offered a guaranty on $BBBYQ's Texas Tax obligations. let's start back in May:
RC himself and RC Ventures (alongside JP Morgan Securities and Sue Gove) are listed in docket 568 as co-debtors for a handful of places and I've picked this page as an example. the creditor is the City of Tyler and look at the Schedule, E/F—that's important.

if we read through the 1,176 page docket we can find the E/F Schedule, here's a page:
here we have our first aha! moment. this section of the Schedule is titled Taxing Authorities and it is here that we find the cities where RC is listed as the co-debtor.

note: some cities are listed twice, once under the Taxing Authorities and then again under Trade Payables (i.e. for the City of Tyler, this is where the utility water bill is located).

I know, taxes are boring but hang in there, here's where it gets fun.

back in September when the Kirkland August fee statement came out, this would have been a very easy detail to miss:
but in fact, it was likely the largest confirmation of RC's involvement in all public disclosures—but, only if you knew what you were looking at.

first, what is a non-debtor party?

a "non-debtor party" or"non-debtor third party" refers to an individual or entity that is not a party to the bankruptcy case but is nonetheless affected by or involved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

you guessed it, like a co-debtor. so, now that we know what a non-debtor is, we can ask the really important question:

WHY is Kirkland preparing Bed Bath tax determinations for someone who is not the Company?

remember, a non-debtor is not a party to the Chapter 11 case, so this is not referring to Bed Bath or any of its subsidiary entities.

also worth noting is when Ms. Geier is documenting this work in the Kirkland fee—on August 29, three days before the end of the voting on the plan. this is not something she would be working on "that maybe would not come to fruition."

now, let's set up a quick timeline:

May 30—RC is revealed as a co-debtor.
August 29—Ms. Geier is preparing the Texas taxes for (I believe) RC.
September 12—was the Confirmation Hearing for the #BBBYQ Chapter 11 Plan.
September 14—the Plan is confirmed.

on September 14—after the confirmation—we get docket 2172. why after? because they can give some more disclosure (while still being light on details) since they know the Plan can be effectuated.

look what we find inside:
in case you did not know (like me!) what the Texas Comptroller was:

"The Texas Comptroller's office is the state's chief tax collector, accountant, revenue estimator and treasurer."

emphasis mine.

so:

• they are the main tax collector for Texas, one of the two main states where RC is listed as a co-debtor (the other being California),..

• and the findings of fact to support the Plan states that their rights are not preserved to pursue any non-debtor third party for tax debts,..

• and the co-debtor counterparties to RC are taxing authorities.

well, would you look at that.

—

Ryan Cohen, you sneaky fox.

gosh, that sure gives me a new perspective on why RC is not buying any $GME, as this would give credibility to the theory that he is under a material info blackout period.

it could also explain why the #GME investment policy has not been utilized yet, which could also explain why Mr. Attal is also not able to purchase, since he may be on the oversight committee.

and yes, I believe that RC is one side of the "third party release." more on that, soon.

jake2b's tweet photo. friends, I feel confident that we have solved the mystery of RC's co-debtor status with $BBBY. looking back at old posts is fun and very neat to see the threads we were pulling on.

as always, looking back at older documentation is invaluable, especially with new understanding. I find it very funny that it was there the entire time, we just had to look. admittedly, it does help to have a better understanding as we go along as well.

in the case of #BBBY, I believe that RC is a co-debtor because he is a cosigner/offered a guaranty on $BBBYQ's Texas Tax obligations. let's start back in May:
RC himself and RC Ventures (alongside JP Morgan Securities and Sue Gove) are listed in docket 568 as co-debtors for a handful of places and I've picked this page as an example. the creditor is the City of Tyler and look at the Schedule, E/F—that's important.

if we read through the 1,176 page docket we can find the E/F Schedule, here's a page:
here we have our first aha! moment. this section of the Schedule is titled Taxing Authorities and it is here that we find the cities where RC is listed as the co-debtor.

note: some cities are listed twice, once under the Taxing Authorities and then again under Trade Payables (i.e. for the City of Tyler, this is where the utility water bill is located).

I know, taxes are boring but hang in there, here's where it gets fun.

back in September when the Kirkland August fee statement came out, this would have been a very easy detail to miss:
but in fact, it was likely the largest confirmation of RC's involvement in all public disclosures—but, only if you knew what you were looking at.

first, what is a non-debtor party?

a "non-debtor party" or"non-debtor third party" refers to an individual or entity that is not a party to the bankruptcy case but is nonetheless affected by or involved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

you guessed it, like a co-debtor. so, now that we know what a non-debtor is, we can ask the really important question:

WHY is Kirkland preparing Bed Bath tax determinations for someone who is not the Company?

remember, a non-debtor is not a party to the Chapter 11 case, so this is not referring to Bed Bath or any of its subsidiary entities.

also worth noting is when Ms. Geier is documenting this work in the Kirkland fee—on August 29, three days before the end of the voting on the plan. this is not something she would be working on "that maybe would not come to fruition."

now, let's set up a quick timeline:

May 30—RC is revealed as a co-debtor.
August 29—Ms. Geier is preparing the Texas taxes for (I believe) RC.
September 12—was the Confirmation Hearing for the #BBBYQ Chapter 11 Plan.
September 14—the Plan is confirmed.

on September 14—after the confirmation—we get docket 2172. why after? because they can give some more disclosure (while still being light on details) since they know the Plan can be effectuated.

look what we find inside:
in case you did not know (like me!) what the Texas Comptroller was:

"The Texas Comptroller's office is the state's chief tax collector, accountant, revenue estimator and treasurer."

emphasis mine.

so:

• they are the main tax collector for Texas, one of the two main states where RC is listed as a co-debtor (the other being California),..

• and the findings of fact to support the Plan states that their rights are not preserved to pursue any non-debtor third party for tax debts,..

• and the co-debtor counterparties to RC are taxing authorities.

well, would you look at that.

—

Ryan Cohen, you sneaky fox.

gosh, that sure gives me a new perspective on why RC is not buying any $GME, as this would give credibility to the theory that he is under a material info blackout period.

it could also explain why the #GME investment policy has not been utilized yet, which could also explain why Mr. Attal is also not able to purchase, since he may be on the oversight committee.

and yes, I believe that RC is one side of the "third party release." more on that, soon.

jake2b's tweet photo. friends, I feel confident that we have solved the mystery of RC's co-debtor status with $BBBY. looking back at old posts is fun and very neat to see the threads we were pulling on.

as always, looking back at older documentation is invaluable, especially with new understanding. I find it very funny that it was there the entire time, we just had to look. admittedly, it does help to have a better understanding as we go along as well.

in the case of #BBBY, I believe that RC is a co-debtor because he is a cosigner/offered a guaranty on $BBBYQ's Texas Tax obligations. let's start back in May:
RC himself and RC Ventures (alongside JP Morgan Securities and Sue Gove) are listed in docket 568 as co-debtors for a handful of places and I've picked this page as an example. the creditor is the City of Tyler and look at the Schedule, E/F—that's important.

if we read through the 1,176 page docket we can find the E/F Schedule, here's a page:
here we have our first aha! moment. this section of the Schedule is titled Taxing Authorities and it is here that we find the cities where RC is listed as the co-debtor.

note: some cities are listed twice, once under the Taxing Authorities and then again under Trade Payables (i.e. for the City of Tyler, this is where the utility water bill is located).

I know, taxes are boring but hang in there, here's where it gets fun.

back in September when the Kirkland August fee statement came out, this would have been a very easy detail to miss:
but in fact, it was likely the largest confirmation of RC's involvement in all public disclosures—but, only if you knew what you were looking at.

first, what is a non-debtor party?

a "non-debtor party" or"non-debtor third party" refers to an individual or entity that is not a party to the bankruptcy case but is nonetheless affected by or involved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

you guessed it, like a co-debtor. so, now that we know what a non-debtor is, we can ask the really important question:

WHY is Kirkland preparing Bed Bath tax determinations for someone who is not the Company?

remember, a non-debtor is not a party to the Chapter 11 case, so this is not referring to Bed Bath or any of its subsidiary entities.

also worth noting is when Ms. Geier is documenting this work in the Kirkland fee—on August 29, three days before the end of the voting on the plan. this is not something she would be working on "that maybe would not come to fruition."

now, let's set up a quick timeline:

May 30—RC is revealed as a co-debtor.
August 29—Ms. Geier is preparing the Texas taxes for (I believe) RC.
September 12—was the Confirmation Hearing for the #BBBYQ Chapter 11 Plan.
September 14—the Plan is confirmed.

on September 14—after the confirmation—we get docket 2172. why after? because they can give some more disclosure (while still being light on details) since they know the Plan can be effectuated.

look what we find inside:
in case you did not know (like me!) what the Texas Comptroller was:

"The Texas Comptroller's office is the state's chief tax collector, accountant, revenue estimator and treasurer."

emphasis mine.

so:

• they are the main tax collector for Texas, one of the two main states where RC is listed as a co-debtor (the other being California),..

• and the findings of fact to support the Plan states that their rights are not preserved to pursue any non-debtor third party for tax debts,..

• and the co-debtor counterparties to RC are taxing authorities.

well, would you look at that.

—

Ryan Cohen, you sneaky fox.

gosh, that sure gives me a new perspective on why RC is not buying any $GME, as this would give credibility to the theory that he is under a material info blackout period.

it could also explain why the #GME investment policy has not been utilized yet, which could also explain why Mr. Attal is also not able to purchase, since he may be on the oversight committee.

and yes, I believe that RC is one side of the "third party release." more on that, soon.

61

828

212

115

138K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

@ThePPseedsShow

almost 2 years ago

Only people who are declared mentally insane know what’s happening. IYKYK #BBBYQ #GME #IEP #NWL #CHWY

70

654

35

9

23K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

@ThePPseedsShow

almost 2 years ago

I pray for my enemies because they won’t be able to handle what’s coming. IYKYK #BBBYQ #GME #IEP #NWL #CHWY

41

545

45

6

24K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

@ThePPseedsShow

almost 2 years ago

The dog days are over July 3rd - august 11 in terms of the summer.

8

222

13

8

11K

Who to follow

RogerBad🇨🇭

https://t.co/NUVs2W1BgV… Proud Hodler of LL🦁#2918 #8746 #SuitGang Alphabots #907 #7285 IcyWhite Card Holder

#LoadedLions #NFTs #CRO #BTC #ETH My collection: https://t.co/lVInlquJyF

MisterCrypto 🍊🟠

Verified account

@MisterCrypto137

Bitcoin Lover 🍊, BoredApeYachtClub 🦍 & #NFT addicted , LoadedLion whale 🐳, CRYPTOPUNK 💜 & MAYC 💚, Crypto friendly ETH , SOL , CRO .

VB_Viki13 retweeted

@MindandEmotion7

almost 2 years ago

I cahn see #Teddy!

MindandEmotion7's tweet photo. I cahn see #Teddy! https://t.co/Vh2fI8np2m

15

219

16

12

9K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

@ThePPseedsShow

almost 2 years ago

“Are we crazy??” “Keep going.”

16

279

11

6

14K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

@ThePPseedsShow

almost 2 years ago

BBBYQ emergence will be the wild card. Remember this tweet.

46

682

67

56

25K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

AMC Theatres @AMCTheatres

almost 2 years ago

USHER: RENDEZVOUS IN PARIS is coming to #AMCTheatres 9/12 - 9/15 only! Captured at La Seine Musicale during Paris Fashion Week, the concert film incorporates his Vegas residency with a seductive French touch. Tickets on sale 8/6. https://t.co/dZ09mKrsH5

29

675

281

7

42K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

almost 2 years ago

I am excited to announce AMC Theatres Distribution’s next concert film — Usher: Rendezvous in Paris. Yes, world class artist Usher! At AMC Theatres and Odeon Cinemas September 12, 13, 14 and 15. To get a sense of the excitement, head to https://t.co/mIMu9IPqWM Done in partnership with Usher of course, and Sony Music Vision and Trafalgar Releasing. Four days in movie theatres worldwide. Get your tickets starting August 6.

CEOAdam's tweet photo. I am excited to announce AMC Theatres Distribution’s next concert film — Usher: Rendezvous in Paris. Yes, world class artist Usher! At AMC Theatres and Odeon Cinemas September 12, 13, 14 and 15.

To get a sense of the excitement, head to https://t.co/mIMu9IPqWM

Done in partnership with Usher of course, and Sony Music Vision and Trafalgar Releasing.

Four days in movie theatres worldwide. Get your tickets starting August 6.

311

3K

944

30

126K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

about 5 years ago

PG-13

ryancohen's tweet photo. PG-13 https://t.co/B2hRaF1yFr

934

14K

1K

38

0

VB_Viki13 retweeted

over 4 years ago

God Bless Gmerica 🏴‍☠️

1K

23K

4K

64

0

VB_Viki13 retweeted

almost 2 years ago

All hail Disney as AMC keeps setting records. AMC’s highest weekend (Thursday to Sunday) for attendance, admissions revenue, food & beverage revenue, and merchandise sales of 2024 — thanks to Deadpool & Wolverine. 6+ million guests graced our AMC Theatres and ODEON Cinemas.

CEOAdam's tweet photo. All hail Disney as AMC keeps setting records. AMC’s highest weekend (Thursday to Sunday) for attendance, admissions revenue, food & beverage revenue, and merchandise sales of 2024 — thanks to Deadpool & Wolverine. 6+ million guests graced our AMC Theatres and ODEON Cinemas. https://t.co/5DgzcFu4dQ

391

4K

1K

39

140K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

AMC Theatres @AMCTheatres

about 2 years ago

When you’re smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Joker: Folie à Deux – coming to #AMCTheatres 10/4. #JokerMovie

10

498

186

8

25K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

AMC Theatres @AMCTheatres

about 2 years ago

All for one… and one will fall. New #TransformersOne trailer TOMORROW. https://t.co/JB9PStIGvp

AMCTheatres's tweet photo. All for one… and one will fall. New #TransformersOne trailer TOMORROW.
https://t.co/JB9PStIGvp https://t.co/pgFoTTY8aF

14

607

193

9

24K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

AMC Theatres @AMCTheatres

about 2 years ago

Try a DO-OVER from MacGuffins Bar® or raise your hackles with THE CROSSOVER, inspired by Deadpool & Wolverine and mixed with Aviation American Gin. https://t.co/9Mm8nlxHAl

13

734

232

37

25K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

AMC Theatres @AMCTheatres

almost 2 years ago

Register now and get two tickets to Deadpool & Wolverine in Dolby Cinema® at AMC 7/29-8/4 to receive 2,000 AMC Stubs® bonus points. Experience the team-up in powerful Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. https://t.co/p8pW3ezSV0

AMCTheatres's tweet photo. Register now and get two tickets to Deadpool & Wolverine in Dolby Cinema® at AMC 7/29-8/4 to receive 2,000 AMC Stubs® bonus points. Experience the team-up in powerful Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos.
https://t.co/p8pW3ezSV0 https://t.co/FVv4D71ggm

15

440

161

13

18K

VB_Viki13 retweeted

over 4 years ago

ryancohen's tweet photo. https://t.co/D30W7wOKT2

1K

24K

3K

137

0

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users