I am unashamedly TRIBAL – I belong to the tribe of Jesus Christ; Yeshua Hamashiach, the Anointed One ✝️
He tells me to: “‘Love the Lord your God with your entire heart, with your entire soul and your entire mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself [that is, to unselfishly seek the best or higher good for others]. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” Matthew 22:37-40 AMP
I STAND MY GROUND – “But I say to you, do not resist an evil person [who insults you or violates your rights]; but whoever slaps you on the right cheek, turn the other toward him also [simply ignore insignificant insults or trivial losses and do not bother to retaliate—maintain your dignity, your self-respect, your poise]”. Matthew 5:39 AMP
By telling His followers to turn the other cheek Jesus was not telling them to accept humiliation in silence. He was teaching them to stand their ground in a way that refused violence yet also refused surrender. This is the way of the Kingdom. Not weak submission but holy defiance. Not revenge but victory through courage and resilience in the face of adversity
[https://t.co/PqDWlEv0G3]
I am a PATRIOT – I hold a heartfelt devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which I believe to be the best in the world. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, spiritually, culturally and militarily
I am a CONSTITUTIONALIST – I believe that next to the Holy Scriptures, the greatest documents ever written came from our founding fathers: The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United American States, The Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers
I seek to be a PEACEMAKER
“Blessed [spiritually calm with life-joy in God’s favor] are the makers and maintainers of peace, for they will [express His character and] be called the sons of God. Matthew 5:9 AMP
“O Divine Master, Grant that I may not so much seek... to be understood as to understand...
“Preach the gospel at all times, when necessary use words.” ~ St. Francis of Assisi
Correcting a Common Misreading of the Bible:
When people hear the words of Jesus saying turn the other cheek they often think He is commanding surrender. They imagine that Jesus calls us to retreat or to let others walk over us. But this is not what He meant
In the world of the first century a slap on the right cheek was not about injury but about public insult. It was a way of treating someone as less than human, humiliating or challenging them
By telling His followers to turn the other cheek Jesus was not telling them to accept humiliation in silence. He was teaching them to stand their ground in a way that refused violence yet also refused surrender.
He commands us to stand our ground
Think about it. If you strike me on the right cheek with your right hand you must do so as a backhanded slap. That was the gesture of a master to a servant. To turn the other cheek forces the aggressor into a choice. They must either strike with the open hand which acknowledges equality or they must stop. In this way the victim has exposed the injustice without becoming violent, and standing their ground
Jesus is not teaching weakness. He is teaching a higher strength. To turn the other cheek is not to bow down in fear but to rise up in dignity. It is a holy act of resistance. It refuses to mirror hatred yet it refuses to give ground to evil. It shows the world that the children of God will not be defined by insults
Meekness does not mean weakness
So when you hear those words do not picture surrender. Picture courage. Picture a man or woman who will not be broken by the cruelty of others. Picture the strength of Christ who on the cross refused to curse His enemies and yet triumphed over them all
Never surrender
Never submit
This is the way of the Kingdom. Not weak submission but holy defiance. Not revenge but victory through courage and resilience in the face of adversity
Trump's most controversial COVID remark was "putting a disinfecting light in the body." In the 1940s that therapy cured many incurable diseases and spread across America until the AMA buried it.
Russia continued the research and proved it treats COVID-19
https://t.co/4qoo9ZXkKR
Islam is evil. Obviously. All demonic religions are. And Islam has a long history of unfathomable violence everywhere it goes, and has plagued Christianity for as long as it's existed. That's why I've advocated for an end to not just Muslim Mass Migration, but ALL Muslim migration to the West. We're full.
That said, when we talk about a systemic campaign of anti-Christian persecution and the organized harassment of Christianity in Israel, people bring up Hezbollah. Talk about Israelis who keep spitting on Christians, you'll be asked about Hamas. It's pathological. It's intentional. The "what-aboutism" is a part of a very intentional public marketing campaign, because if you're thinking about Islam, you're not thinking about Israel.
The reason Israel gets talked about - other than that we aren't subsidizing Hamas or Hezbollah with our tax dollars (much) - there's another, more Biblical reason:
We're told in the Bible to shoulder the burdens of our fellow CHRISTIANS (Galatians 6:2) - not unbelieving Jews, not pagans, not Muslims. But, CHRISTIANS. And the Christians in Gaza aren't as worried about Hamas. They're worried about Israel. And they are *substantially* more worried about Israel. And that makes sense, because Israel has murdered waaaaay more innocent people - including Christians - than Hamas ever dreamed about.
But it's not just about bombing Christian churches for no discernible reason and killing nuns with sniper fire. The indigenous Christians in Israel face treatment at the hands of Israelis that no Christian on Earth should have to endure. Yes, they get treated worse in Nigeria. We're not funding Boko Haram or providing them missiles to shoot at churches during worship. We're funding Israel.
When I made a comment on Tucker about the Ottoman Millet system, comparing Ottoman and Israeli treatment of Christians in Palestine, it caused a small uproar. Some alleged things I did not, in fact, say. Others assumed my intentions were to minimize Islam's evils, whitewash history, paint Muslims as misunderstood angels, or outright deny Islamic atrocities in other places or eras.
The thing is, as one prominent critic reluctantly admitted in the first few minutes of his rather lengthy diatribe, my claim was, "technically accurate." I'll translate: "Technically" means "inconveniently." It gives history a wrinkle, and we like history to be flat. We don't like our historic facts with asterisks. And, I provide all the receipts in this article, down to the last detail, in careful footnotes with links to see the evidence for yourselves.
The case is simple: Out of geopolitical pragmatism, the Ottomans' Status Quo was adopted by most of Europe and retained long after the empire ended. The system it produced made Europe hesitant to support a Jewish state because it worked for Christians. It was functional, and most sides were content, and so content, they didn't want to mess it up. Their philosophy was simple: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
While the Ottomans were genocidal outside of Palestine, they recognized the tinderbox that the Holy Land could easily become and treated it differently. So no, they didn't tax churches. While they taxed Christians a special tax, it purchased privileges unavailable to everyone else. Christians didn't have to enlist in the Ottoman and Muslim army. They couldn't be dragged into Sharia courts. Christian communities were given local autonomy for their community government.
They weren't "equal" citizens in the sense of a liberal democracy in the 21st Century, and they couldn't carry weapons - but neither can the British. That tax was collected by the church leaders, with the right to exempt the elderly, children, widows, and the disabled. And it also protected them under imperial decree, forbidding anyone from laying a finger on their head under threat of bodily punishment and fine. Pilgrims were off limits and protected by Janissary guards. And the Ottomans' firmans and capitulations structured a legal system giving Holy Sites' upkeep and repair imperial sanction, permanent protection, and a mechanism to fund it. In certain cases, like the 1868 repair of the rotunda roof of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, they even contributed to its renovation.
This is in contrast to their regime of terror generally everywhere else, and compared to anywhere else in the world where people were conquered, even in Christian empires, God preserved and protected Christians in the Promised Land from those who otherwise ran a brutal regime.
That's it. That's the argument. And those facts are helpful when answering a question. The question is why the Ottomans inherited Palestine with 20% Christians in 1517, and passed it off to the British in 1917 with 20% Christians, their population steady. Then, the Israelis took it from the British in 1948 with 20% Christians. Why, after 77 years, has the Christian population in Israel - that remained steady for four centuries - suddenly collapsed to 2%?
That type of economic collapse is usually associated with ethnic cleansing and the Bubonic plague. By comparison to modern Israel, the Millet System is a good apples-to-apples comparison to figure out what went wrong. Recently, churches were told they had "back taxes" to pay - which they haven't paid in 17 centuries - totaling millions of dollars. When they couldn't afford it, their bank accounts were frozen and they were threatened with land confiscation. Christians are spit on in the streets. Jewish arsonists burn down churches, and police don't respond to calls for emergency services or prosecute the criminals. The Lehava and La Famlia gangs engage in organized violence against Christians. Clergy were turned away from church on Easter.
And, despite not hearing it in American media, all the major church denominations are complaining about holy sites falling into disrepair. Despite making billions from Christian tourism, the Israeli Dept of Tourism isn't funding upkeep for Christian sites. Christians are fleeing. And in the polls of those leaving, they're placing the blame on their treatment at the hands of Israel, or the economic collapse caused by the Gaza genocide.
I didn't invent the claim that they had it better under the Millet System. That's a charge made in an official statement from the indigenous denominations of Israel, who've been there since before even the Ottomans ruled. They'd know.
So, why can't someone who has been outspoken about the evil of Islam, the one who raised the biggest stink about Russell Moore's mosque-building efforts, who advocates for NO Islamic migration, and doesn't quibble about Islamic atrocities, mention a single historic caveat about a historic reality? The answer is, it's not allowed.
It's not political propaganda. It's religious. It's rabbinic. The Talmud and Rabbinic teachings deny - in no uncertain terms - Imago Dei. The difference between the Christian belief in this doctrine and the Jewish denial is one of the biggest, most fundamental differences between our two religions. It's one of the reasons that a "shared religious heritage" is pure myth. We believe people can *become* evil. Jews believe the goyim are *ontologically* evil. That's the difference.
In order for YOU to support THEIR behavior, you need to accept THEIR religious suppositions. History must remain flattened for this to succeed. Stereotypes must not be questioned. Exceptions must not be thought possible. Islam must not only be evil, but Muslims must also be evil, and ALL Muslims must be evil (including the ones who don’t know what Islam is because they’re tiny and still have their baby teeth). Even our Christian hope that their souls are salvageable must be discarded as a dangerous thought.
Muslims must not only be evil, but they must also be as evil as humanly possible. Any fact or data point that could make them be perceived as less evil might lead to someone asking, “Why did you bomb that apartment building of 300 people to kill one guy?”
If Muslims are not ontologically evil, from birth, and irreparable and unsavable, it will lead you to question why the IDF's "Daddy's Home" targeting system waits for them to get home to kill their wife and kids, too, before firing. It will lead you to ask why they've killed more children than adults. They don't want you asking.
Muslims, for this Israeli propaganda op to work, must have a complete monopoly on evil. Because if they don't, then maybe some of that evil is shared by Israel, too. That is why any attempt to say, "Hold on a minute. It didn't always used to be like this in Palestine," is met with accusations of being some kind of "Islamic Apologist."
If there was a time when there was an imperfect system, with imperfect people, that still functioned better for Christians than what exists under the Israelis now, then that means there are reasons for the current chaos and an explanation for the hellscape that is currently the Middle East. That's more complicated than Israelis want it to be.
If history is complicated, then so too is the present. And Americans thinking through things carefully is not in the Israelis' best interests.
Read more at Insight to Incite. Link in bio. Audio available.
@LostMyHats Q: I watched your interview with Tucker wherein you stated that Muslims were (I believe the word you used was) 'KIND' to Christians
I know you got some blow back; how do you reconcile that with this article
Thanks
1958 called… it wants its conspiracy theories back 😅😏
‘The First Book of Airplanes’ casually drops cloud seeding with planes for rain and a flat earth map complete with ice wall flight path.
What in the vintage fever dream is this? 📖✈️
What the doctor says vs what it actually means.
“Your LDL is high.”
What it means: Your body is producing more of the molecule it uses to repair tissue, make hormones, and carry fat-soluble vitamins to your cells. That is biology doing its job.
“LDL is the bad cholesterol.”
What it means: LDL is a lipoprotein. A transport vehicle. It carries cholesterol to the cells that need it. There is no bad cholesterol. There is only cholesterol doing its job.
“You are at increased cardiovascular risk.”
What it means: A population-level risk calculator produced a percentage. It does not know your insulin level, your inflammation markers, or your LDL particle size. It knows your age and your total cholesterol number.
“Statins will reduce your risk by 50 percent.”
What it means: Your relative risk drops by 50 percent. Your absolute risk drops by around 1 percent. These are not the same number. One of them is used in the consultation. Malcolm Kendrick documents this distinction in Doctoring Data.
“Statins are well tolerated.”
What it means: Known side effects include muscle damage, fatigue, memory problems, and raised blood sugar. Well tolerated means most people stay on them.
“This is the standard of care.”
What it means: This is what the guidelines say. The guidelines were written by committees where financial conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies are well documented.
The doctor is not lying. They are following a protocol. The protocol is the problem.
Did your doctor explain the difference between relative risk and absolute risk before they wrote that prescription?
Share this with people who need to hear it 🙏🏻
Pharma’s gift that keeps on giving.
Millions of pregnant women were pumped full of the synthetic estrogen DES in the mid-1900s, told it was perfectly safe.
The result for their sons?
A small survey of DES-exposed men found 77% identified as transgender, intersex, or gay.
They turned healthy baby boys into lifetime pharmaceutical customers before they were even born.
This wasn’t an accident. Gender confusion = lifelong drug dependence.
Same playbook, different decade.
How many more “safe and effective” experiments do we need before we connect the dots?
https://t.co/6eSGPrgzlz
🚨 197 CANCER PATIENTS. 84.4% CLINICAL BENEFIT. WHY ISN'T THIS BIGGER NEWS?
For years, one of the biggest criticisms of Ivermectin and cancer research was:
"Where are the human studies?"
Now, one of the largest human observational studies has been peer reviewed and published in a major cancer journal.
According to the published paper, this is one of the largest human observational studies evaluating a combination of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in cancer patients.
The study followed 197 cancer patients using a combination of:
💊 Ivermectin
💊 Mebendazole
After approximately 6 months, researchers reported:
📊 84.4% experienced a clinical benefit, including:
✅ 32.8% with no current evidence of disease at follow up
✅ 15.6% with tumor regression
✅ 36.1% with stable disease
❌ 15.6% with disease progression
The researchers were clear.
This was an observational study, not a randomized clinical trial.
That means it cannot prove the medicines caused the reported outcomes, and other treatments may have contributed.
But here's the question many people are asking:
If an observational study involving 197 cancer patients reports an 84.4% clinical benefit ratio...
Shouldn't that be enough to justify larger, well designed clinical trials?
That's how science moves forward.
Not by accepting every finding.
Not by dismissing every finding.
But by investigating promising signals with better research.
📌 Save this post if you want to follow future research on repurposed medicines.
💬 Do you think results like these deserve larger randomized clinical trials? Why or why not?
💊 Stay informed and access premium Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole at @RxMeds_store with worldwide delivery.
#Ivermectin #Mebendazole #Fenbendazole #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #ClinicalTrials #MedicalResearch #Cancer
They have it backwards! High BP is a symptom, not a cause of arterial damage. Did you know:
•There's no evidence aggressively lowering BP saves lives
•BP meds have a lot of side effects—including death Here I share all the hidden data on blood pressure.
https://t.co/OfreYsNtRx
What if the World’s Fairs weren’t showcasing new buildings... but explaining old ones? 👀
Why did these massive structures appear, draw millions, then disappear?
History... or cover story?
#Tartaria#WorldsFair#HiddenHistory
🚨🚨ESPELUZNANTES DECLARACIONES DEL Dr. Chris Shoemaker:
"El cariotipo cromosómico de la personas "vacunadas" contra COVID ha sido modificado genética y permanentemente.
Un tercio del peso de cada inyección que recibiste era ácido desoxirribonucleico, que tiene la capacidad de atravesar el núcleo de tu célula. 👇
Lamentablemente, se descubrió que en las células hepáticas y muchas otras células de tejido de pacientes, tanto vivos como fallecidos, el cariotipo cromosómico de la persona ha cambiado permanentemente. Sus espermatozoides, sus células ováricas, sus células del bazo, sus células inmunitarias, en el centro de la médula ósea, todos han cambiado permanentemente y ahora tienen material genético que no es humano y, ciertamente, no representa su humanidad"... 👇😳
As a proud, unvaccinated human being, I am one of many who tried to warn the world this would happen.
World renowned, Attorney, and my good friend, Todd Callender and I did many shows about this back in 2021.
I flew to Denver Colorado on Nov 2022 to watch him argue this very point in the 10th circuit court. Three judges listened to his rational argument, sighting a Supreme Court case that explained anything natural that becomes unnatural, becomes property and is owned by the patent holder of the compound that affected that change.
Now layer that fact, in with the new surveillance state, cryptocurrencies which are tracked and traced, just like CBDC’s, hyper scale AI data centers everywhere under the fear porn threat of losing this race to China, which is already a massive surveillance state, and the globalists desire to depopulate the planet, and you know where this is going.
America is no longer a free republic. We are a captured corporation.
They permitted it.
Not in some distant, abstract sense.
They permitted the industrial rape of British children...girls as young as nine and ten, drugged, trafficked, gang-raped, and passed between networks of men while the institutions meant to protect them chose silence, career preservation, and ideological comfort instead.
Rotherham alone gave us a conservative estimate of 1,400 victims between 1997 and 2013.
The same pattern repeated across town after town. Recent inquiries place the true scale in the hundreds of thousands when decades and locales are accounted for.
This was not a failure of imagination.
It was a failure of nerve dressed in the language of sensitivity.
Police filed reports and looked away.
Councils weighed “community cohesion” against broken children and chose the former.
Social workers returned drugged girls to their abusers.
Mid-level functionaries and ideologues performed the ordinary administrative work of hell because confronting the truth threatened their status, their pensions, and the narrative they had sworn to protect.
Hannah Arendt named this long ago:
the terrifying normality of those who enable atrocity not through monstrous intent, but through the refusal to think from the standpoint of the violated.
The neurological and psychological wreckage inflicted on these girls is permanent.
Trauma rewires the nervous system.
It forges hypervigilance that never sleeps and attachment injuries that poison every subsequent relationship.
These were not “troubled teenagers.”
They were children the British state abandoned to packs of predators while lecturing the rest of us about racism and cohesion.
The men who raped them are animals.
But the greater monsters are the suited cowards who licensed it.
They are still among us. Some still hold positions of influence. And they should not be permitted the luxury of sleep.
This is not a story that ends with the first convictions or the latest inquiry announcement.
We are not letting this go.
The tree of liberty grows hungry, and those who fed it the blood of Britain’s daughters have forfeited the right to pretend the reckoning will pass them by.
Read it. Share it. Remember their names.
https://t.co/1GsKGFyniI
The Republican establishment has grown so fucking arrogant they no longer even pretend to hide their contempt for the people who elected them.
They smile for the cameras, take the votes, cash the checks, and then turn around and treat the base like peasants at the gate…unwelcome, inconvenient, and easily dismissed by whatever minor functionary they’ve empowered to do their dirty work.
Scott Presler just caught it on video.
A Thune crony…or at least a creature of that entire insulated ecosystem…looked one of this movement’s most relentless, effective organizers in the eye and snarled the quiet part out loud for the world to hear:
“Get the hell outta here.” “I’m the asshole saying you can’t come in.”
Let that land.
Let it burn straight through whatever polite fiction you were still clinging to.
This is not a staffer having a bad day.
This is not an isolated lapse in “optics.”
This is the unfiltered id of a political class that has spent years insulating itself from the very voters who dragged it out of irrelevance and handed it power.
The same class that turns the Senate into a procedural graveyard for anything the base actually demands.
The same class that lets consultants and lobbyists and lifetime functionaries treat the people who win their elections like problems to be managed rather than partners to be respected.
The contempt is not accidental.
It is structural.
It is the psychological defense mechanism of elites who sense…correctly…that the base is no longer content to be placated with rhetoric while the actual agenda of sovereignty, borders, and accountability dies in committee.
What you are about to read is not another polite autopsy of RINO behavior.
It is a forensic examination of that contempt in its natural habitat…its origins in elite capture, its transmission downward through staff and donors and event gatekeepers, its inevitable collision with a base that has finally stopped asking permission to be angry.
It names the pathology without euphemism. It traces the fracture in the social contract between Republican officeholders and the people who actually deliver their victories.
And it leaves the reader with the only question that still matters: when the door is slammed in your face by the very people you put in power, what the fuck are you prepared to do about it?
If you are still telling yourself that “our guys” are different, that the Senate is a fortress for the base rather than against it, that basic respect is too much to expect from the machine you keep feeding with your labor and your loyalty…this piece will finish the job of disabusing you.
If you already feel the rage in your bones, it will give you the precise language to weaponize it.
The mask is off.
The contempt is on record.
The only remaining variable is whether we keep accepting the role of peasants at the gate…or whether we burn the fucking gate down.
https://t.co/J5Hr7Sr853
I covered this a few years ago, sunscreen actually causes cancer, sounds crazy, but the biggest studies shows that.
The kind of cancer you get from the sun is Basal Cell carcinoma, which is not deadly, the survival rate from basal cell after five years is 100%
Lack of sun is deadly & gives you the kind of cancer that is deadly. They’ve known this since the 30’s .
Can we just take a minute to give this king his flowers.
Baron basically started his podcast less than a year ago and today he’s deservedly one of the best (and top) podcasts on the internet.
I don’t think there’s ever been a more impressive or well deserved rise in online information-media than Baron’s. And he’s still just in his opening act.
And it’s because he is not only a generational talent who works like a dog and was made for this, but also because he’s a genuinely good dude, good dad, god fearing man.
Be more like Baron. 🇺🇸
Elon: George Soros hacked the system to turn NGOs into graft machines
"He figured out that you could leverage a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby for the politicians to send a ton of money to that nonprofit.
So you can take what might be a $10 million donation to create a nonprofit and leverage that into a billion-dollar NGO.
The government continues to fund that every year, and it'll have a nice sounding name, like the Institute for Peace, or something like that, but really it's a graft machine."
Source: @joerogan, RoganRecut (YouTube) / Writer: Ian
A diagram from a British government official document showing that the story of smallpox and vaccination in Leicester at that time wasn’t what the medical establishment and later history refused to see. The diagram and associated text speak for themselves.
“This diagram shows (1) An enormous rise in Small-pox mortality after a quarter of a century of continuous vaccination up to 1872, which period ends with five years’ penal enforcement of vaccination, and the highest Small-pox epidemic known in Leicester for more than fifty years;
(2) From 1872 a rapid decline in vaccination is observable, and is coincident with our lowest known rate of Small-pox mortality, and with the introduction of the Leicester treatment of this disease;
(3) With the abandonment of vaccination and the perfecting of the “Leicester Method” of Sanitation, Isolation, Quarantine, Disinfection, &c., during the last six years Small-pox mortality becomes extinct.”
[Fourth Report of the Royal Commission Appointed to Inquire into the Subject of Vaccination: With Minutes of Evidence and Appendices. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode for H.M. Stationery Off., 1893. Print. [C—6527.] p. 434, Diagram B.]
PURE EVIL!
Babies hearts cut out and their faces cut through while still alive to obtain brain tissue.
According to Dr. Theresa Deisher, babies are born alive at five to six months, and their beating hearts are removed without anesthesia for research, researchers also cut through their faces to collect brain tissue.
“The babies are still alive when the researchers start extracting the tissue, to the point where their heart is still beating, and they’re generally not given any anesthetic, because that would disrupt the cells that the researchers are trying to extract.”
PAMELA ACKER, Biologist
“Included the lung of the fetuses?”
“Yes.”
“Included skin?”
“Yes.”
“Kidney?”
“Yes.”
“Spleen?”
“Yes.”
“Heart?”
“Yes.”
“And this was just one study. So I’m going to ask you again: In your entire career, how many fetuses have you worked with?”
“Um, well, I don’t remember the exact number, but, uh, quite a few when we were studying them originally, before we decided to use them to make vaccines.”
“Do you have any sense? I mean, this one study had 76. How many other studies did you have that you used the aborted fetuses for?”
“I don’t remember how many.”
“You’re aware are you aware that one of the objections to vaccination by the plaintiff in this case is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in the development of vaccines and the fact that it’s actually part of the ingredients of vaccines?”
Big Pharma + Planned Parenthood.
"I don't believe we have a cruel choice." — Kevin Warsh
With one line, the new Fed Chair buried a core rule of the British imperial system. Here's what's replacing it. 👇