@Kirin83777097@MangakaNekoChan i don't really care about skin lore, and og vayne is still trying to take back control of herself especially now after the demon corruption that locke exorcised out of her
@Kirin83777097@MangakaNekoChan it's not throwing dirt on parts of itself it's creating a new character with his own personality traits. if they want someone to be able to face down demons without fear let them, that's an archetype not present in the game
@Claire122195@MangakaNekoChan so it's just an issue about the lore people who dont even play the game complaining that the devs want their new character to have a positive reception from people showing that even fiddlesticks can't scare him since it's still just a demon and his whole thing is to be anti demon
@Claire122195@MangakaNekoChan yeah i get that you watched one necrit video but he's still a demon, besides i'm 99% sure summoner's rift voicelines are not canon since summoner's rift isn't canon along with some characters still mentioning the idea of summoners.
@softvanillacake@MangakaNekoChan doesn't really matter it's still a demon and locke's whole thing is exorcising demons, he's prepared for this exact moment
@VMrbeef@mikemearls 2. If the term is a term of art within the context that would be readily understood by the average person for whom the work was made, then use that. 3. If neither 1 nor 2 apply, use the common dictionary definition. 4. If the dictionary definition makes the rule nonsensical...
@Darthshadow25@mikemearls which since as you already said the book was written for modern humans it is designed in context for human to be talking about the average modern human since ability scores are in chapter 1 and species are in chapter 2, they'd have no prior context to knowing a separate context
@Darthshadow25@mikemearls "2. If the term is a term of art within the context that would be readily understood by the average person for whom the work was made, then use that." in where does it reference the in world race if commoners can be of any race?
@Darthshadow25@mikemearls also nonsensical since commoners are humanoids of any race in dnd, which means 10 of intelligence is in fact average to a modern human as that is who the players handbook was written for.
@Darthshadow25@mikemearls as you just said, the players handbook was made for modern humans which means any descriptor of humans are implying modern ones, thus my interpretation is valid and yours is not.
@Darthshadow25@mikemearls so then by your own logic it's nonsensical to assume they're talking about medieval humans when the book was written for modern day humans
@Darthshadow25@mikemearls you are genuinely just intentionally missing the point i fear, i show proof of 10 int being the human average and you just dodge and say "oh well WHAT human" as if dnd doesn't establish humans as their own species rather than a society.