Ballard conned the ref (he tried to do it again in Europa).
The panel agreed on that 5-0.
But only 2 vs 3 thought VAR should then intervene?
This demonstrates that there’s STILL a clear misalignment of the purpose and use of VAR within PGMOL (aka @prorefofficial )
#SackWebb
The thing that makes this even more confusing, is my problem after the incident wasn't even with the referee. He got conned by Ballard and in real time it's easy to make a mistake, as he did - and as the KMI have unanimously noted.
That's when he needs VAR to bail him out and correct the decision. So to then say VAR shouldn't get involved is so baffling.
What is the point of it then? Surely an incident like this is the exact reason it's been introduced?
10/10 parenting. I will die on the hill that supporting young adults and staying right there with them as they climb into adulthood is one of the most important things you will ever, ever do as a parent.
One of the unfortunate (imo) things about modern social media culture is that people are scared to show gratitude or emotion because they’re so scared of being perceived or made fun of by others. It’s enormously increased cynicism. I often revisit that post Liverpool interview in 2020 when we fluked a win and Arteta was still honest about the gap between Liverpool and Arsenal at that point. There’s so much noise and a lot of it (not all) is bad faith but the signal was strong at the start. And I’d say make sure to enjoy it because it doesn’t last forever
The airline has normalised charging passengers for seat selection that people are blaming an individual who is calling out Indigo for not allotting a toddler a seat next to its parent.
Why are there so many posts like this ignoring common sense? Cost to merchant WILL become cost to consumer - why are so many people pretending that's not the case? Do they really think the public is that stupid to buy that surface level explanation? Ragebait bait or voluntary misinformation or both? At this point I have no idea! Thanks Elon!
Oliver, you dishonest piece of cretin, scrapping VAR would lead the league to Fergie days where officials would have even less accountability from what exists today. Nor would it affect title contenders, it would also DISPROPORTIONATELY affect lower teams because of biases
Saw somewhere that the maize that was being used for feedstock is now being redirected towards ethanol production because of which egg farmers are paying a higher input cost, leading to higher output prices for eggs.
All roads point to Gadkari ji's masterstroke.
In one stone, he not only made his son generational wealth, but also hit every middle class person in the country right in their balls, effectively crippling the middle class consumer economy.
Only £50m. Fee dropped £10m in 24 hrs after stating our price and we’re only taking home £40m?
Whilst dealing with Saudi Arabia for a 25 yr old Brazil itn / great CL record/ PL record and one of most prevalent PL wingers of the last 5 years. Still with 1+1 on his contract
I'm trying to understand how Gabriel Martinelli is a £60 player (to Saudi!) when:
- Barcola is £130M
- Rogers is £116M
- Diomande is £120M
- Savinho is £85M
Martinelli is a 25 years old Premier League winner with 5 years experience in the league.
It will just take just one consistent and dominant Indian player/pair to make badminton very very very popular in India
Sindhu Saina started that trend now need someone who is consistently winning titles
Hopefully WS who has the potential to achieve this after LA🤞🤞