V_eta Z

Нет, я ничего не знаю... итак, давайте просто предположим, что я не знаю! Британская девушка с русским сердцем! 🇷🇺

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

America - Israel's bitch!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@iamAtheistGirl I don’t know but can’t you just message me @iamAtheistGirl

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@iamAtheistGirl Can you message me?

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

Or at least the illusion of free will in reality we are presented with limited options that have variable consequences! @iamAtheistGirl

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

Can Trump play both the isolationist to appeal to a domestic audience whilst also maintaining a broader foreign policy agenda intent on enhancing U.S. global economic and military dominance!

The real question whose going to pay the cost?

#DeclineOfUSImperialism

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus I don't see any point in continuing the discussion! It's not tapping out I just thought I'd save you further embarrassment and humiliation!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus The irony here is that you are using a Logical Positivist framing one I never claimed and that you yourself refute in a desperate attempt to invalidate my argument!

The intellectual gymnastics... please accept defeat gracefully!

I think we're done!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus I am not claiming the statement 'God exists' is meaningless (the LP position); a position that I haven’t even claimed you introduced it not me!

I am stating it is unsubstantiated!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus Got it! However, you’re making a fundamental category error! Logical Positivism was a theory about the meaningfulness of language; the Burden of Proof is a principle of epistemic justification!

Keep trying...

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus Ever heard of logical positivism? I’m familiar with it, but since you’re the intellect here why don’t you define it for me? Specifically, how do you think it applies to my point about the burden of proof?

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@Thedukeistheman @camwg86 @darwintojesus He thinks that he can win an argument through 'intellctual bullying' but he is no more intellectual than than the non-falsifiable entity he's trying to defend!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus Until you provide a verifiable method to distinguish a 'transcendent god' from a 'non-existent' one, my rejection of your claim is the only logically approach!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@camwg86 @darwintojesus I don’t need to 'prove' the non-existence of a non-falsifiable entity any more than you need to prove the non-existence of an invisible, intangible belief! The burden remains with the one asserting the existence of a transcendent being!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@IronBullForge76 @AgainstAtheismX The comment you responded to is an example of this! We can discuss it more in depth and compare the internal evidence regarding this particular "prophecy" or indeed any other articles of faith!

[V_eta Z @V_eta1]

@IronBullForge76 @AgainstAtheismX I do engage in serious debate, Sam! I often provide evidence-based critique! Occasionally, the hostility I receive leads me to respond with a flippant comment!