Klaus 🐧

faaahhh!!!

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

Just checked out @TinFunNFT an incredible PFP project blending ancient Chinese tales with blockchain tech. It's a fascinating mix of old-world charm and future-forward innovation.

Totally unique in the #NFT space!

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@durov TG feels like home, thanks pavel 🫡

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@EncrypticTV Elite ball stuff 🔥

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

I really need that $100, I hope you understand 👺

[dare market @daremarket]

If you want a chance at $100, please quote this with anything.

[Sid @EncrypticTV]

I checked my parents' LIC policy last year.
The agent had promised "guaranteed returns + life cover."
The real returns? 4.5% per year.
A bank FD gives 7%.
That one calculation changed everything for me. 🧵

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@daremarket @itzklaus2 Gl bud

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

Brotherhood was not the only thing they tested tonight

[dare market @daremarket]

Best caption gets $100

[MeG (active ON-chain) @Jaishiva0302]

Everyone beware of @AlloraNetwork and team ❌

The whole team is totally fraud

“They are not the future of prediction market if they can’t stand by their own’s words”

@binance @kucoincom @MEXC_Official
I want you to please check this post and take action before your users gets scammed

Act 1

The CEO and core team member @nickemmons is accused of using a big part of funding they raised ($33m) to buy a house and post that on X
not just this he is totally manipulating the community

For reference check 1st photo i shared
On 9 NOV he twitted where he clearly stated that the previous data was not accurate and they will release a new checker on 10 NOV
Just so community stop writing about them being shady
And now on 11 NOV there were no changes in checker not a single announcement they did on discord
They are all not responding to question
And they started claim already without any announcement

Its not about the eligibility criteria but its about the trust
The trust which should be there within community and project

You cant trust these team members they are total fraud

Act 2

They said 9.3% of the supply was for early contributors…
But in reality, only around 170 addresses are eligible to claim — including the Forge participants, who actually built the foundation of Allora’s tech.

Then came the Allorapilled role — where community members had to grind for weeks, post endlessly about Allora, and in the end? Eligible to claim a grand total of 0 tokens.
That’s the level of “reward” they’re offering.

Meanwhile, NickOG role holders can claim 35 $ALLO — that’s about $17 at premarket.
And for those who actually ran worker nodes, they get a “staking boost” of 24%… with zero tokens to stake.

Like seriously, what even is this?

Will attach more things in coming tweets

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

@AvexYashtin @thearena @nochillavax @CultureOnAvax If you didn't enjoy the song posted above, here's something you might like instead 🥀

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

@AvexYashtin

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

Speculation on Linea Airdrop Methodology

(One of the most likely possible models based on everything they’ve done so far)

- After sybil filtering and POH verification, Linea has a clean dataset of around 780k real wallets. Among them, users hold between 1 to 12,660 LXP. Based on past mechanics especially how LXP was distributed to Voyage NFT holders we can reverse-engineer a likely airdrop structure that’s logical, scalable, and fair.

📋 LXP is the Foundation, But Not Linearly Used:

- Linea already mentioned there will be multipliers and thresholds. But the core of the drop is almost certainly still centered around LXP. And like the Voyage NFT → LXP distribution, this won’t be linear.

In that drop, if someone held more Voyage NFTs, they didn’t just get x2 or x3 rewards. Instead, Linea applied a logarithmic stacking function with a curve factor of 0.3.

Meaning:

- First NFT = full points
- Each next NFT = less value
- Still stackable, but rewards taper as quantity increases

They used the formula:

min_points + (max_points - min_points) × (log(nft_balance) / log(max_nft_count))^curve

This same kind of curve can logically be applied to LXP itself for token rewards.

📋 Applying the Same Logarithmic Formula to LXP:

A wallet with high LXP won’t receive tokens linearly. The return on LXP slows down at higher levels just like NFT stacking.

So the reward model likely looks like this:

reward = min_tokens + (max_tokens - min_tokens) × (log(LXP_wallet) / log(12660))^C

Where:

- C is the curve factor (likely 0.3 to 0.4)
- 12660 is the highest LXP seen in the wild
- min_tokens and max_tokens are scaled dynamically within the allocation pool
- This rewards higher contributors while preventing whales from taking everything

The goal: benefit active users without overrewarding the TOP 0.1%.

📋 A Minimum LXP Threshold (~1,500):

This is not to filter sybils, that’s already done. This is likely to set a minimum base allocation, i.e. if you’re under it, you:

- Get a tiny base amount
- Or you get nothing

Why 1,500?

Because even one Alpha NFT (from Voyage) gave ~1,715 LXP. And NFTs were airdropped to anyone who participated in testnet phases. So real users likely crossed 1.5k LXP easily.

This makes it a reasonable threshold to:

- Keep idle or low-effort claim wallets out of the main reward pool
- Ensure low-volume users still had a fair shot if they did anything meaningful

📋 LXP-Based Allocation + Activity-Based Multipliers:

Once the base reward is calculated via LXP + log curve, the final token allocation might be multiplied by onchain activity factors.

These multipliers could include:

▫️Pre-Dencun gas spend on Linea
▫️Activity across multiple distinct months, not just 1-week farming
▫️Ethereum mainnet history
▫️ENS holder
▫️Held Voyage NFTs (already counted in LXP, but may get a bonus multiplier)
▫️Held ecosystem assets (@efrogs_on_linea NFT, Other tokens such as @LinusOnLinea, @FoxyLinea, etc)
▫️Used bridges or LP’d into Linea-native assets
▫️Deployed contracts or created relayer interactions

These factors aren’t primary weightings they’re multipliers applied post-curve, so as not to override LXP logic.

They would increase the reward by 5–50% depending on how many were matched.

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

🧵 Why Kaito Yappers Community is getting out of control?

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@crsamra Waves

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

So we’re just gonna sit here and act like @union_build hasn’t been quietly cooking for months while CT was busy chasing every other “modular this, zk that” trend?

You wanted real infra? Not another EVM fork with a marketing budget? Then look again.

This isn’t just some interoperability gimmick. Union’s trying to stitch together the mess everyone else left behind.

If they actually pull off this Kaito move before TGE, y’all are gonna pretend you were early.

You weren’t.

You just ignored it because it wasn’t loud enough.

Watch closely.

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@coinbase @baseapp I joined CT to farm engagement. Ended up proposing to a wallet drainer, minted a cursed frog on Base, and now I owe Vitalik child support in $DEGEN

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

Fellow yappers if you’ve been grinding and feel for a comeback, FOLLOW me, drop ‘DONE’ below, and I’ll follow back quick.

Let’s rebuild together 🦅

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

💎 $PORTAL is live! 💎

Portal is the cross-chain ecosystem leading the future of gaming. $PORTAL is now listed on @binance. 👀

I just received my Crystal Dash airdrop - and joined the community at the forefront of Web3. 🤝🏻

Game on! 🎮

[itzKLAUS @itzklaus2]

Update on Xpet:

✅ You can join https://t.co/c6HkbuyRWv with the code: xpet_adfb77d3 ($50 BPET free)

The price of $BPET has doubled since our last guide.

Also, those holding NFTs are making $122 every day per NFT.

Looks like we might get our ROI in a week.

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@xpet_tech @subinium thanks for the info xpet

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@xpet_tech hmmm interesting xpet

[Klaus 🐧 @Vamp_Jerry]

@xpet_tech hohohohoho xpet