☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎

IC XC ☦️ NI KA
♟️𝕮𝖍𝖊𝖘𝖘 𝕽𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝟮𝟮𝟰𝟬♟️

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@2MANYFACEZ @TopHater67 @validclipx "Hustling" to you is paying to blatantly bot with zero return? Hes looking for quick cash after the judgment in court. Twitter is filled with bots, likely paid for by people who spend money on bots like Soulja lmao

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@ItsYaBoiSoma2 @TopHater67 @validclipx The judge did. When they ordered 4m in damages and now hes paying for bots. Pretty simple really

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@JaytonKing @TopHater67 @validclipx The 4m assualt judgment has strained his financials. Now hes paying for bots so blatantly hes getting zero payback on it. Geniuses all of you

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@Holrs @2MANYFACEZ @TopHater67 @validclipx He's PAYING for bots and getting no activity. He just got hit with a 4m judgment from some woman he assaulted.

[memetic_sisyphus @memeticsisyphus]

There’s millions of people like this. Millions of them. They’re not joking, they’re not trying to win a debate, this is their brain working at full capacity. They don’t understand there’s a predictable reaction from a police officer when you drive your car at them. They don’t understand the shoplifting has nothing to do with why the police fired. This is their brain working at full steam, it produces an amoral broken chain of logic that pisses them off because nothing makes sense to them. She’ll vote.

[𖤓 𝐋𝐢𝐨𝐧 𖤓 @Lionspectre]

More than 75% of the world thinks like this btw, and if they ever truly got power, they would genocide us.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@souraniss @_iamnotlewis @AzraelRuin @bonevoid Okay. Explain how. Stop bare asserting it. Explain.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@TopHater67 @validclipx Hes doing this because he blew the money. You and 90% of all human beings would as well.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@Maxberkcellik @ghostygirlfarts @HVMHaber Nah. Canine trainers who are more educated and more paid than you will actually keep doing this forever. Sorry. Maybe become an adult and stop being mentally disabled.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@AboveTheGods_ @TDHBXG >not close at all
The important part is when the gun is pulled, deflection
You dont even realize youre doing it lmfao just a fallacy idiot machine. We were talking about the fact he pulled the gun so close, so you HAD to bring up the framing of when he DIDNT have the gun.
Grow up

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@AboveTheGods_ @TDHBXG (DHS/ALERRT) states: When the shooter is at close range and you can not flee, your survival chance increases by trying to incapacitate them aggressively.

Within close range, you can not reliably out pace the shooter.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@AboveTheGods_ @TDHBXG Or just totally ignore what I actually said, genius.

Does it feel intelligent to strawman what people say and then argue with that instead? Surely you understand i can scroll up and read what I said vs what you just said and see you did not engage with anything, right?

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@AboveTheGods_ @TDHBXG Yeah, it's all fabricating a fantasy world then. Once the gun is pointed, illegal and menacing, I've no reason at all to assume the criminal isn't going to shoot.

literally nothing to indicate that.

[地獄ケーキ(Hokusaist)👹🐉🗡️🇺🇸 @JigokuCake]

Things like the Rape Gang Inquiry can ONLY be politicized because progressives can't accept such things into their worldview without completely invalidating their own political project, which posits that multiculturalism and "diversity" (specifically in white first-world countries) is always a moral good.

Moreover there is no progressive solution to this. You can't imprison, deport, etc. entire communities of Pakistani men and still call yourself a progressive. It doesn't work.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@LReborn11 @Leonardaisfunny You defending rapists as an atheist is extremely on brand.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@cemyasar @HVMHaber You watched how professionals do it. The video shows it.

You dont like it because you're soft.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@AboveTheGods_ @TDHBXG Stop deflecting.

So it would of been smarter for him to be shot in his back as he was fleeing? This also doesnt support what you originally said.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@DFine2002 @ShitpostRock2 Yeah the report is linked. You think the issue is patriarchy? I just want to make sure before I insult you because that would be the most insane take

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

@afall40 @ShitpostRock2 User is in the UK and Muslim btw.

[☦︎𝕬𝖗𝖈𝖍-𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖚𝖘☦︎ @Vampyr_Bat]

I can attack your argument. It's an internal critique, and you oddly can not defend it at all. Even still.

The man broke zero laws. He was defending his child. A law breaking idiot suddenly pulled a gun and fired. The man lived, and his daughter is fine as well.

You have now asserted the father was foolish because he "THOUGHT he was tough."

I just want you to go ahead and support that. You're too stupid to do it, i know, which is why you can't and are deflecting. That's why im asking. I want you to realize how obviously stupid you are to normal people in life.