@2MANYFACEZ@TopHater67@validclipx "Hustling" to you is paying to blatantly bot with zero return? Hes looking for quick cash after the judgment in court. Twitter is filled with bots, likely paid for by people who spend money on bots like Soulja lmao
@JaytonKing@TopHater67@validclipx The 4m assualt judgment has strained his financials. Now hes paying for bots so blatantly hes getting zero payback on it. Geniuses all of you
Thereโs millions of people like this. Millions of them. Theyโre not joking, theyโre not trying to win a debate, this is their brain working at full capacity. They donโt understand thereโs a predictable reaction from a police officer when you drive your car at them. They donโt understand the shoplifting has nothing to do with why the police fired. This is their brain working at full steam, it produces an amoral broken chain of logic that pisses them off because nothing makes sense to them. Sheโll vote.
@Maxberkcellik@ghostygirlfarts@HVMHaber Nah. Canine trainers who are more educated and more paid than you will actually keep doing this forever. Sorry. Maybe become an adult and stop being mentally disabled.
@AboveTheGods_@TDHBXG >not close at all
The important part is when the gun is pulled, deflection
You dont even realize youre doing it lmfao just a fallacy idiot machine. We were talking about the fact he pulled the gun so close, so you HAD to bring up the framing of when he DIDNT have the gun.
Grow up
@AboveTheGods_@TDHBXG (DHS/ALERRT) states: When the shooter is at close range and you can not flee, your survival chance increases by trying to incapacitate them aggressively.
Within close range, you can not reliably out pace the shooter.
@AboveTheGods_@TDHBXG Or just totally ignore what I actually said, genius.
Does it feel intelligent to strawman what people say and then argue with that instead? Surely you understand i can scroll up and read what I said vs what you just said and see you did not engage with anything, right?
@AboveTheGods_@TDHBXG Yeah, it's all fabricating a fantasy world then. Once the gun is pointed, illegal and menacing, I've no reason at all to assume the criminal isn't going to shoot.
literally nothing to indicate that.
Things like the Rape Gang Inquiry can ONLY be politicized because progressives can't accept such things into their worldview without completely invalidating their own political project, which posits that multiculturalism and "diversity" (specifically in white first-world countries) is always a moral good.
Moreover there is no progressive solution to this. You can't imprison, deport, etc. entire communities of Pakistani men and still call yourself a progressive. It doesn't work.
@AboveTheGods_@TDHBXG Stop deflecting.
So it would of been smarter for him to be shot in his back as he was fleeing? This also doesnt support what you originally said.
@DFine2002@ShitpostRock2 Yeah the report is linked. You think the issue is patriarchy? I just want to make sure before I insult you because that would be the most insane take
I can attack your argument. It's an internal critique, and you oddly can not defend it at all. Even still.
The man broke zero laws. He was defending his child. A law breaking idiot suddenly pulled a gun and fired. The man lived, and his daughter is fine as well.
You have now asserted the father was foolish because he "THOUGHT he was tough."
I just want you to go ahead and support that. You're too stupid to do it, i know, which is why you can't and are deflecting. That's why im asking. I want you to realize how obviously stupid you are to normal people in life.