Bob Runnells

Good times in the Pacific Northwest

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@JayInslee This better be a joke. Satire channel? Inslee’s climate commitment act is what is killing is at the pump and that tax underlies all other production and consumption costs.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

Fauci in 2017 promises a surprise outbreak is coming.
And now more files are exposed.
https://t.co/Bjo7ngoQMk

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.

https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@DNIGabbard And don't forget the DoWar. DARPA anyone????? and all the other black budget programs. Mainly those that sit at the biowarfare intersection.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

I kinda get the biowarfare brinksmanship that must be taking place out of our view (Read: RFK Jr's The Wuhan Coverup, and the Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race) because we just can't know or trust other countries - friend or foe. My largest concerns remain: what about for-profit organizations using GOF as a drug discovery tool? As exposed by James O'Keefe, pharma does do this. Our lovely internet and now AI tools can help Fauci Jr. do GOF in his kitchen.

Our planet now has 8 billion humans, lots of historical human-mammal interaction (rodents mostly; bats, ferrets not so much) for millenia, I argue that all the dangerous microbes that are going to evolve, have already evolved. The only evolutionary pressure causing mutations is from biowarfare fear (GOF) and profit motives. I would love @GVDBossche opinion on this.

[CHD - Washington State @WAChildrensHD]

Tuesday May 26, 5 PM pacific.
X Space to discuss the importance of Duty to Disobey.
https://t.co/mghFRBaCjF

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@PattyMurray Wrong again Patti. The fund sets aside $1,776 billion.

[CHD - Washington State @WAChildrensHD]

Informed Life Radio 05-22-26 Biological Dentistry and Whole-Body Health https://t.co/Vg7rhcXWFG

[Andrea Katton @walkshappening]

@thehoffather Was just talking to someone about the uptick in homeless in the last week in downtown Vancouver.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@GodsRiddles Maybe that’s ok. If they’re not going to distinguish between investigational, then all vaccines should be treated as investigational - which we know because one can never know the outcome of an injection. Uncertainty with finality when things go wrong.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@PattyMurray No. Simply no. Patty, you are now 1000% opposite of my issues. Can you please just leave and go back to being a (grand)ma.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Someone inside Kaiser sent me the below internal guidance concerning shots and medications for newborns.

It tells Kaiser employees that the "approach to how we introduce and administer routine newborn ... Hepatitis B vaccine" is to " avoid saying ‘it’s optional’ or ‘you can refuse’ unless directly asked” and to tell parents that "we will be giving" instead of asking consent to give. This is the antithesis of informed consent. Yet Kaiser calls it “excellent patient and family care.”

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

They were trained to follow orders but also sworn to defend the Constitution. Did they have a duty to disobey?

June 30 is a ways off, but I got my tickets for the premiere screening of Duty to Disobey.

https://t.co/UKb3ZJYOYY

https://t.co/aAkZZeEvof

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@skepticalraptor Hi Dorit. Please list your ‘real science.’ RFK jr always has information backing his statements. Perhaps you could urge our public health agency, and their billions, to study this since Pharma won’t.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@GovBobFerguson Resisting "federal efforts to access voter data?" means to me that you don't want WA to participate in federal elections.

[Brian Ward @GodsRiddles]

Due to persons wanting a one-page executive summary to fight back against judicial activism relating to America's right to refuse medical experimentation, I published the following Exec summary at https://t.co/jj0X4yRYPG Use this as a tool to educate your elected leaders.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@XavierMBrown @GodsRiddles It's beyond political. It directly impacts 4th amendment protections. It simply cannot be true in the U.S. that a government can require/mandate/coerce/cajole citizens to participate in a medical procedure.

[Bob Runnells @Vanbroncbob]

@elonmusk Is there a trans person who hasn't taken psychoactive prescription drugs?

[Jim Walsh @JimWalshLD19]

Another day at the Capitol in Olympia, another rally. This one sponsored by Informed Choice WA, fighting for medical freedom in WA since before Inslee's COVID attacks.
This fight never ends. Ferguson's "regional public health" scheme is the latest attack.
https://t.co/asgyB8rrgm