Having spent two Diwalis away from home while I was abroad, I know how much you miss your family and loved ones, especially during festivals.
So, a little extra love to everyone spending this Diwali away from home. I hope you get to celebrate the next one with your loved ones. ❤️🪔
#WATCH | Keralam: CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke arrives at Kochi airport to attend the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)'s 'Jantar Mantar at Kochi' protest against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
He says, "It is a people's protest, and I am here on the invitation of the organisers and on the invitation of Prakash Raj. As I said earlier, the fight against Gyanesh Kumar will continue until we get an independent and impartial election system in India..."
#WATCH | Keralam: CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke says, "More than 13 crore voters have been deleted. How can we expect that these elections are being conducted free and fair when you erase more than 13 crore voters, which makes up 13-14% of the registered vote share..."
He adds, "Votes are being deleted across the country. There is not even a single state where votes are not being deleted..."
How much commission did Jitendra take from the alleged foreign funding to get Dharmendra Pradhan sacked?
After all, he was the one at the negotiating table.
The government should have taken inspiration from @Wangchuk66’s school and worked towards building more such schools.
But we have a govt that seems more invested in vindictiveness than education, and in targeting those who bring change rather than learning from them.
Every decision taken by Gyanesh Kumar has now been reversed. But reversing those decisions raises an even bigger question: If his actions were serious enough to warrant reversal, shouldn't there be consequences for the man responsible?
And more importantly, what if @RitikaChopra__ had never exposed this? What if there had been no public outrage? Would these decisions have ever been reversed?
How many such decisions go unquestioned simply because nobody exposes them?
Post-2010, the world witnessed a renewed fascination with strongman politics. People were persuaded to believe that democracy was slowing down progress and that one powerful leader could solve all their problems.
They placed their faith in leaders who considered themselves bigger than institutions and promised national greatness, prosperity and global dominance. Instead, what followed was the erosion of democratic institutions, repression of rights, wars and economic turmoil.
Recent political trends suggest that this faith in strongman politics is beginning to unravel. People are realising that concentrating power in one individual who claims to be strong does not necessarily make a nation stronger. They are rediscovering the value of democratic freedoms, accountability and the institutions they once took for granted.
More importantly, they are beginning to question what national greatness really means. Before promises of global dominance, people want something far more fundamental: economic stability, an affordable cost of living, and accountability from those in power.
.@SauravDassss is collecting PILs and contempt petitions like they’re Pokémon cards.
Koi state bacha hai bhai jaha koi PIL ya contempt na laga ho tere against?