@xcnikahd@Katapetasma2 Are you not familiar with Constantine, Constantius II and Valens? They supported Homoian Arianism as church doctrine, while Constantine II, Julian, Jovian, and Valentinian all favored imperial neutrality on church matters. Your church doctrine did not sprout out fully formed.
@xcnikahd@Katapetasma2 Arianism was the official doctrine of the Imperial Church for circa half a century, and was therefore orthodox.
The original council of Nicaea declared the son and the father to be same in hypostasis and ousia. Modern Neo-Nicene christianity claims one ousia and three hypostases.
@xcnikahd@Katapetasma2 It was the tradition they received, because from 328-379, Homoian Arianism was the orthodox christian doctrine of the Roman Empire.
@shr_eax@EvangelicalDW Nestorian Christianity is Nicene and Dyophysitist like Orthodoxy. The Subordinationism of the early church fathers and the Arian-Constantinopolitans were not co-equalist Nicenes.
@AdrienBoieldieu@chrisbrunet Constantine's mother Saint Helena was almost certainly an Arian/Lucianist as well. Every church father before 300 was a subordinationist.
@TatenokaiGael@AkkadSecretary Heaven is where the police, chefs, mechanics, lovers and organizers are Japanese.
Hell is where the police, chefs, mechanics, lovers and organizers are Indian.
@wobowobi@FortressLugh Even Snorra Edda extensively quotes pre-christian poetry, some of which is also preserved elsewhere, some that only survives because of Snorri.
@TatenokaiGael@AkkadSecretary Heaven is where the police, chefs, mechanics, lovers and organizers are Japanese.
Hell is where the police, chefs, mechanics, lovers and organizers are Indian.
@lilautisticcat@StefanFrancisci Portugal calls it 'cha' because they got their tea from Cantonese speaking Macau. Western Europe calls it 'te' because the Dutch got it from Min speaking Fujian. Eastern Europe calls it 'cha' because their tea came from the silk road.
A Dutch guy tore one of the pages to find that it was actually modern wood pulp paper (invented in the 1850s) that had been artificially aged with tea or coffee. And while the pages were brown, the inner fibers were still white.
Oera Linda; The Forbidden Chronicle
In 1867 a manuscript known as the "Book of Oera Linda" appeared in Friesland. Written in old Frisian, supposedly passed down from generation to generation, it tells the story of a vanished culture, Atland, in Northern Europe.
The chronicle tells of a caste of priestesses who kept "the light of truth". It mentions wars with peoples from the South, a flood that swept away vast regions and a time when the peoples of the North still possessed great power.
The mainstream quickly dismissed the work as a forgery, supposedly a 19th-century joke. But there is one detail: linguistic details appear in the text that were not scientifically deciphered until decades later. How could a supposed forger have known words and laws of language that were way ahead of his time?
Even more interesting: many motifs are reminiscent of Atlantis, the flood, but also Nordic myths. Could the chronicle of Oera Linda be a buried memory of a true culture originating in Europe, a kingdom erased from the History books?