What happened? It is hard to fathom. We fought the Nazis to save Europe at unimaginable cost to our country, both economically and in lives. We are now allowing hordes of young men belonging to Islam and its neo Nazi Fascist ideology to flood our country, who, in addition to being rabid antisemites, are anti-women and girls, raping and assaulting them.
This is an insult to decent British people and their ancestors, many of whom lost their lives to defend Europe against Nazi ideology. We need to stand up for what is right, both for ourselves and for those who sacrificed their lives for us. They did not do it to see us welcome people to our country with virtually the same ideology as the Nazis, except worse in that they regard women and girls as beneath them as well.
Standing up in Parliament today, listening to these pathetic MPs jeer and insult me when I voice serious concerns that millions of British women are feeling across the country, I felt so ashamed to sit in that building with those people.
This is not complicated.
Countless foreign men from cultures and religions which treat women like shit are now roaming our streets - whether they arrived legally or illegally, the point remains. Wilfully imported by Conservative, Labour and Reform politicians. All of them have blood on their hands.
Afghans, Somalians, Albanians, Sudanese, Pakistanis, Eritreans. The importation list goes on and on…
They drink, they loiter, they spit, they intimidate, they harass. They make life hell for so many women and girls across Britain.
It is NOT normal. Do not accept it as normal.
These are our towns, and I want them back.
I feel very grateful that there is now a political party with the balls to not only outline the problem, but the determination to actually do something about it.
That party is Restore Britain.
We are going to take our country back.
I have never felt more determined.
This is Birmingham, England.
Look at this arrogant prick. Islamists are openly saying native Brits are not welcome in their own city.
Starmer and the EU’s weak borders flooded Britain with mass migration and killed integration. Now the streets belong to them.
Islamists wanna replace you now.
Remigration is the only way to save England.
The Great Replacement is erasing the British people in real time.
Repost this if you want Britian back!
Christians attacked at Speakers Corner. Preacher and cameraman bloodied. Area taped off. Attacker apparently under arrest.
Expect:
No statement from the Home Secretary
No article on @BBCNews
No "we must act" statements from the usual suspects
Video @SteveRightNLeft
We are beyond sick of this narrative. The rising anti-Muslim feeling is a direct consequence of the behaviour of some Muslims. This is the sole reason. Do you not wonder why there is no rising anti-Buddhist hate or anti-Japanese feeling?
The more you push this false narrative and refuse to confront the cause, the worse it will get. Certain elements in the Muslim community have been demonstrating anti-white racism for some time. They have been perpetrating appalling abuses on women and girls. Instead of dealing with it, those in power have tried to hide it which was a huge mistake. The dam is bursting and it is the fault of the extremists in the Muslim community. It is making Britain worse for all of us, including other minorities who are being tainted by this behaviour in the public's mind.
Start calling the bad people in minority communities out instead of calling out people who are sick of this abuse, which is a legitimate position to hold. Of course, it is not legitimate for anyone to attack innocent people on either side, but we have had plenty of attacks from the Islamist side.
The attack in Edinburgh was appalling, and we must recognise the pattern as well as dealing with the perpetrator. Islamophobia and anti‑Muslim hatred have been steadily normalised.
Our national security requires us to challenge every form of divisive racist rhetoric fuelling violence on our streets. This must stop.
https://t.co/kM40xQrpZV
He Promised to Clean Up Politics. He Took More Gifts Than Any of Them.
Keir Starmer built his political identity on one promise above all others. After fourteen years of Conservative sleaze, partygate, donor scandals, a Prime Minister fined by police, he would be different. Standards in public life would be restored. The contrast was the entire pitch.
The declared gifts tell a different story. By September 2024, two months into government, Starmer had accepted more than £100,000 in tickets, clothing and accommodation, more than any other recent party leader, Conservative or Labour, on record. Nearly 40 sets of free tickets during his time as Labour leader. £4,000 of Taylor Swift hospitality. £698 for Coldplay. A free four-day holiday to a Welsh beauty spot worth £4,500. From Labour donor Waheed Alli alone, £20,000 of accommodation, £16,000 of work clothing and £2,485 of glasses, while Alli was simultaneously given a pass to Downing Street.
The accommodation deserves closer attention. It was Alli's £18 million Covent Garden penthouse, and Starmer's justification was that his son needed somewhere quiet to revise for GCSEs, away from journalists outside the family home. A sympathetic explanation, until you learn the same penthouse had already been used by Starmer in December 2021 to film a televised "stay home" message to the British public during the pandemic, with family photos and Christmas cards arranged on the shelves behind him to make it appear he was broadcasting from his own house. He told the country to stay in theirs while filming from a borrowed multi-million pound flat dressed to look like somewhere it wasn't.
Compare the total to the people he replaced. Rishi Sunak declared no personal hospitality beyond a £2,595 club membership. Liz Truss recorded four modest items across an entire decade in Parliament, a football match, Wimbledon, an opera and the races, totalling under £4,000. David Cameron's largest declared item was a £4,475 discount on personal training. Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister whose conduct Starmer spent years campaigning against, still didn't approach £100,000 in personal gifts while actually serving in Downing Street. Starmer's total exceeds the combined declarations of several of his predecessors, and he reached it within months of taking office.
When the scale of this became public, Angela Eagle, then a serving minister, was sent to defend it on Times Radio. Asked the simplest possible question, why the Prime Minister couldn't buy his own glasses on his own salary, she said: "I'm afraid I'm not responsible for decisions the Prime Minister makes. I don't have an opinion." No defence was offered because none existed.
Starmer's own justification, that security requirements prevent him from sitting among the public at events, might extend to concerts as well as football matches. It does not explain the Welsh holiday, a private four-day stay with no public stand to avoid. It does not explain the £16,000 of work clothing or the £2,485 glasses, items with no security dimension whatsoever. And it does not explain why a Labour donor was funding his wardrobe while simultaneously holding a Downing Street security pass.
This matters now for a reason beyond the original scandal. Starmer's net approval has since collapsed to minus 66, the worst recorded for any Prime Minister since Ipsos began tracking in 1977. The instinct from his own side is to blame billionaire-funded misinformation, foreign interference, a hostile press. None of that explains this. The gifts were real, declared in his own name, on the public record, defended by his own minister with the admission that there was nothing to say. The collapse in trust did not need to be manufactured. It was earned, line by line, in the register of members' financial interests, by a Prime Minister who promised the country something his own conduct then failed to deliver.
The real question is why you would want to characterise someone on the 'far right' as thinking that. Only a complete moron would try to argue that absolutely no one was nice and that none of them wanted to thrive. Some immigrants are useful, productive members of society and some are not. Statistically, the ones who are most likely to be an economic drain on our country and commit more crimes are those from Islamic countries. Islam is a danger to civilisation.
All migrants come here for one reason only: because they want to improve their lives somehow. Either because they want free housing and benefits, or because they are working and can earn more than in their home country. The only driver is that they want more/better than is available in their home countries.
This is why the narrative from the left that immigrant NHS workers are somehow noble people who have made sacrifices to come and save us is so disingenuous. They came, just like every other migrant, because it was better for them. They did not sacrifice a better life at home to come and help us. All narratives about how we should be grateful to immigrants are fundamentally mistaken. They came to help themselves, and that it assisted us was incidental, and if they had not come, then someone else would have, or if no one did, we would have, and should have trained our own doctors. Medical schools are fiercely competitive, and I am sure that many who were turned down because there were not enough places would have made very good doctors and nurses.
I am sick of this false narrative around immigrants. These women came here because they could earn more and have a better life than in their country of origin. Their action was not a noble sacrifice; it was motivated by what motivates us all: what is best for them and their families. This is normal human behaviour.
These nurses are no different to British ex-pats working in Dubai for the personal benefit of earning more. Yes, they left family behind, but they did it because doing so was worth it for them.
All nurses are wonderful, caring people, immigrant or otherwise. However, the immigrant nurses have come here to benefit from what Britain has to offer, not as noble people sacrificing a better life back home for the British. Indeed, it could very easily be argued that it is more noble to stay in your country of origin to help your own people rather than leaving for personal financial gain.
Stop the false narrative.
Mahmood is leaving the Labour Party because it does not focus enough on Gaza. This encapsulates the problems that the followers of Islam represent.
Islam teaches Muslims that they should always put the Ummah first, so we have people like Mahmood in positions of power who, rather than focusing on the area they are supposed to represent, focus on a place that is irrelevant to their constituents.
The same behaviour is apparent in Muslim MPs who waste parliamentary time demanding an airport in Pakistan, asking questions about Gaza, backing cousin marriage and calling everyone racist. This last one is of particular interest as research shows that Muslims are significantly more racist than the white population.
The revolting crimes of the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs were clearly racially motivated; they specifically selected white girls and often used the term 'white' as a term of abuse.
Mahmood is also complaining about Reform councillors and says they are causing a rise in anti-Muslim feeling. As usual, he is putting the cart before the horse. The existence of Reform councillors is a response to what immigrants have been doing, not the other way around. I the Muslim community behaved as the Sikh community, who have low crime rates and low rates of benefit claimants, Reform councillors would probably not have been voted in in such large numbers.
Without radical reform of what Islam teaches, there is no coming back from the growing anti-Muslim feeling. Islam is a religion that is racist, homophobic, and misogynist. It teaches its followers that Muslim men are superior to everyone else, including Muslim women, who are property to be controlled. It teaches that all non-Muslims are inferior and may be taxed, exploited, enslaved and raped.
These teachings are the ideology that enabled the Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs. This is why the vile perpetrators of these crimes were not rejected by their communities as white paedophiles would have been. In the eyes of Islam, these men have done nothing wrong, so their communities continue to embrace them. There is no clearer demonstration of the dangers of Islam to decent people who believe in equality and religious freedom.
Regrettably, this is an inevitable result of allowing uncontrolled immigration by young men from the Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan, and Turkey. These men commit crimes at a much higher rate than natives and are an economic drain on our country.
The public sees the British people, particularly women and girls, being subjected to rape, sexual assault, violence, robbery and murder by this group of immigrants. Consequently, they see all black and brown people as undesirable and a threat. They do not appreciate the nuance and that religion is possibly the factor that connects these people more than skin colour. Most of the male criminals from Muslim countries happen to be brown/black, so the public associates their criminality, incorrectly, with skin colour. The public misses the nuance that it is the culture produced by a 7th-century religion that is a big factor because you cannot tell by looking at someone what religion they follow, whereas skin colour is obvious.
White immigrants from Muslim-majority Albania are significantly more likely to be involved in crime, particularly robbery and people smuggling/slavery. In contrast, brown Sikh men are significantly less likely to be involved in any crime. To know this, you have to study the statistics, and of course the average person does not. They just repeatedly see reports of brown/black immigrants committing crimes and associate all brown/black people with criminality and see them as undesirable. This is highly regrettable but also inevitable.
I have been saying for some time that uncontrolled immigration and favourable treatment of brown/black people over whites is damaging to all, including the decent, hard-working immigrants amongst us. The left appears unable to understand how the human mind works, and the unfair demonisation of the decent immigrants is one of the consequences of their refusal to accept that certain immigrants are a problem and must not be allowed in our country, whilst others are welcome. Which ones are welcome has everything to do with the culture of their home countries and nothing to do with skin colour.
We are tired of two-tier everything. Another violent attack by an immigrant from a Muslim country, and we are told it is an isolated incident, and we must be calm.
George Floyd dies in another country, and not one of these people ever said it was an isolated incident and everyone should stay calm. They were all taking the knee and joining the rallies whilst allowing protests about an event in another country that had absolutely nothing to do with us.
We are not stupid; it is not an isolated event. There are thousands of rapes and violent attacks by Muslim immigrants. This is not isolated. The British are very tolerant, but this has gone way too far, and our tolerance is at an end.
This continuous insistence by Muslims on setting Muslims above everyone else and obtaining special treatment for them is what is driving anti-muslim hate. No liberal society should recognise or protect an ideology that is anti-equality, anti-freedom, racist and discriminatory, nor should there be any special treatment of people who follow such an ideology. We need a law that prevents ideologies that promote inequality and discrimination from receiving charitable status, government money or recognition.
This is happening in the UK now. We must use the law to stop an Islamic takeover. As well as repealing the anti-Muslim hate law, we need the following laws:
1. No organisation that does not endorse equality and freedom of religion, or that endorses violence and discrimination, should receive charitable status, or government funding or recognition whatsoever.
2. No law shall be written that discriminates between people on the grounds of their religion or ethnicity; either by applying only to them or allowing them exemptions from laws that apply to others.
3. No asylum applications from anyone who has entered the country illegally.
4. Banning of cousin marriage
5. Instant deportation for first and second-generation immigrants convicted of crimes. No exceptions.
This continuous insistence by Muslims on setting Muslims above everyone else and obtaining special treatment for them is what is driving anti-muslim hate. No liberal society should recognise or protect an ideology that is anti-equality, anti-freedom, racist and discriminatory, nor should there be any special treatment of people who follow such an ideology. We need a law that prevents ideologies that promote inequality and discrimination from receiving charitable status, government money or recognition.
Labour does not protect women and girls as they are reliant on the Muslim vote and the Muslim communities that vote for them believe protecting fellow Muslims is more important than women and girls, especially white women and girls.
Research shows that Muslims are significantly more racist than white people. This is what our anti-racism stance has done. It has allowed the importation and growth of racist communities to the point where anti-white racism is embedded in our institutions—this is self-destruction.
Why does Islam need special protections? Is it because it needs to keep its project of taking over hidden and its embedded discrimination and hate hidden?
The special protections afforded Muslims and only Muslims, which are now being employed to shut down legitimate criticism of the evil politico-religious project of Islam, must be repealed. It should be replaced by a law stating that every person must be treated equally under the law and that forbids special exceptions or laws for only one religious or ethnic group from ever being made.
The left has created a new culture of institutionalised racism; they have institutionalised anti-white racism. Treating everyone the same is a fine goal; replacing one type of racism with another, one aimed against the native people who built our country, is a disgrace.
The Henry Nowak case has revealed how left-wing ideology has corrupted our police and criminal justice system.
Labour are making the problem far worse - but we must also explain how this ideology was allowed to take root under a Conservative government.
Not just Africans, many white slaves were taken too, and the African/Arab slave trade is alive and well today.
Institutionalised anti-white racism is demonstrated by the incessant focus on the trans Atlantic slave trade whilst ignoring the most prolific slavers of the world because they are black or brown. The number of slaves taken by Africans and Arabs, and still being taken, makes the trans Atlantic slave trade look like a minor blip.
'Britain now has areas where the state has ceded control to parallel societies that openly threaten violence if the law is applied equally. The mask is off.'