This essay is my attempt at offering a positive vision for the laity and their mission of building Christendom today. I am interested in having conversations with anybody who is planning, or involved in, relevant constructive projects.
“Liberalism attempts to dissolve all intermediary institutions so that the atomised and deracinated individual is utterly bare before the almighty state.”
By Theo Howard @VendeeRadio
https://t.co/G0k6HuuZsJ
@pinokeisland All feminism (denaturing of women and denial of male headship) is evil. It is about achieving pseudo-power over other women, but more importantly over men.
Henry Makow says, "Feminism tricked women into seeking power instead of surrendering it for love."
A just humiliation and punishment.
"As for my people, their oppressors have stripped them, and women have ruled over them. O my people, they that call thee blessed, the same deceive thee, and destroy the way of thy steps." - Isaiah 3:12
The new head (laywoman) of the Vatican Dicastery of Communications is a feminist and made an appeal to Francis in 2022 for more female representation:
“I think it’s because he’s surrounded by men [laughing]”
There was also this incident in 2022, when +Egan denounced one of the friars for preaching against the promotion of unnatural vice in his diocesan schools.
Clearly, he prioritises maintaining the entrenched interests of vicious anti-Catholic "leaders" in his schools over orthodox public preaching on faith and morals.
https://t.co/j3uD8kdlla
@Anglophile1649 Funnily enough, I have a forthcoming podcast on Americanism next week. I think radical reform (corporate baptism) is possible one day. For now, I advocate pre-political localism.
Each radical phase of Revolution is followed by its consolidation through institutionalisation. Anglicanism follows the English Deformation, Napoleon and his Code follows the French Revolution, JPII and BXVI followed Vatican 2. Now Leo XIV consolidates the Bergoglioan Synodal phase.
- Miguel Quesada
Bishop Egan is at least "suspect of heresy" according to traditional doctrine.
According to traditional Catholic discipline, “(i)t is not licit for the faithful by any manner to assist actively or to have a part in the sacred (rites) of non-Catholics” (Can. 1258 § 1 CIC 1917). “(C)ommunicating in sacred things” with heretics or schismatics (and, a fortiori, those who do not profess the name of Christ at all) made someone “suspect of heresy” (cf. Can. 2316 CIC 1917).
https://t.co/EGGkVPsxar
There is one institution on earth which opposed the Sexual Revolution (at least in doctrine) whole and entire and has always upheld and defended marriage and the natural social order - the Catholic Church. Proof of the Church being the One Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ.
I just finished recording a long discussion with @VendeeRadio.
We covered, among other things:
- the American Revolution
- separation of powers
- naturalism and freemasonry
- Leo XIII and Americanism
- the conciliar understanding of religious freedom
- Jewish power and the post-liberals
Expect the episode to be out next week and, if you’re not already familiar with Theo’s work, consider aquatinting yourself.
Bishop Fellay recounting a confrontation that Archbishop Lefebvre had with Cardinal Ratzinger and the CDF about the Church’s teaching on religious liberty.
That's all cogent but many sedevacantists seemingly do not have the humility to admit that the perpetuity of the hierarchy is at least a problem for their position, for which there exist a variety of alternative hypothetical answers. Rather, they sometimes present their position as a dogmatic certainty and anathematise those who do not adhere to it.