I'm Ben, 14, from Israel. I build developer tools for AI agents.
Now: AgentKey (https://t.co/fPVMb5CCq1). It checks whether an agent's tool call may run and keeps verifiable evidence of each decision.
Before: TrustFace, deepfake detection for video calls.
I post what I learn.
Question for people running Shopify or SaaS sites: which flow would you trust an AI agent to complete on your site today? Checkout, signup, booking, or none?
A mistake from yesterday: I posted that I was finding out how many sites break for AI agents, then never shared an answer. Honest update: no real scans have run yet, so I have no number. When they run, I'll post the result here with how it was measured.
Cookie banners are the first wall an AI agent hits on a lot of sites. If the reject button is hidden behind a second click, the agent may never reach your homepage.
An icon-only button with no label looks fine to you. To an AI agent reading the page, it can be a blank. Add an aria-label and you fix it for screen readers and agents in one line.
Building BotFumble in public. Each agent run will save a replay, the exact step where the agent got stuck, and a check on whether the signup or order went through. The record is signed so nobody can edit it later. Which flow on your site would you test first?
I’m 14. Been building with @base44 for 1.5 years.
Got into the Fusion bootcamp. Didn’t make the next round.
But I kept shipping.
Now my Elite access is gone, and $200/mo is out of reach.
@MaorShlomo any chance of 2 more months?
Too young to quit building over a subscription.
Claude guys i need your help
I’m making the request for claude startup progam,I made it yesterday too but it seems like every time I send one, it’s as if it doesn't actually go through.
Do I just have to wait? I’m not receiving any emails... and if I log in to see if I’ve been accepted, I have to fill everything out again from scratch.
Shimmed vercel/ai tool.execute to run authz at the client hop before the tool is reachable. Live: charge amount=10 and 10000 both fail closed, zero side effects, Merkle + Ed25519 sealed. Call-identical shim, not the npm pkg. I work on AgentKey
@signaln0tn0ise For a denied call we record the action, resource, runtime argument hash, reason, session event id. Records live server-side, HMAC attested, Ed25519 signed, sealed at session close. Useful as proof without the agent holding secrets. I work on AgentKey
I'm Ben, 14, from Israel. I build developer tools for AI agents.
Now: AgentKey (https://t.co/fPVMb5CCq1). It checks whether an agent's tool call may run and keeps verifiable evidence of each decision.
Before: TrustFace, deepfake detection for video calls.
I post what I learn.
@hazemomier Keep the signed denial log server-side behind fail-closed checks. Each denial records the runtime argument hash; at close the chain is HMAC plus Ed25519 sealed. The agent token never holds the key, so it cannot forge the log. I work on AgentKey
MCP auth is standardizing under RFC 9728, OAuth for MCP. OAuth scopes a token to a tool. It cannot scope a token to an argument value or seal denial evidence after the call. They operate at different layers.
Nobody can name the person who approved an agent action. MCP v2 names the agent and the account but never the human who decided. Attribution stops at the wrong hop.
Security folks compare MCP to Telnet-grade protection, a serious read from BHIS. The fix direction is client-side gating before the resource server, with authorization bound to the call, not broad tokens.
Authorization has to run before the tool call and be bound to the value. That is the default we build: deny first, signed evidence after. https://t.co/fPVMb5C4At.
Four popular agent frameworks this week showed the same gap: a guardrail flag that never enforced, a peer that self-approves, and a jump that bypassed a reject. The hole is at the framework hop, not the model.