Robert Vermilyea

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@JonathanWNV Just go away!!!

[AG 🔥 @Yolo304741]

Omg 😂

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

Breaking news, the Governor General approved $40.3 billion in spending while the government is shutdown. CBC gets $178 million and CSIS gets $127 million.

Unbelievable, given we are in an election, knowing the last three elections had foreign interference.

[Dan Knight @DanKnightMMA]

At a campaign rally in Hamilton, Ontario, Liberal leader Mark Carney unveiled what can only be described as a coordinated assault on digital freedom in Canada. Behind the slogans, applause lines, and empty rhetoric about unity, one portion of Carney’s remarks stood out for its implications: a bold, unapologetic commitment to controlling online speech under the guise of “safety” and “misinformation.”

“We announced a series of measures with respect to online harm… a sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories—the sort of pollution that's online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.”

He then made clear his intention to act:

“My government, if we are elected, will be taking action on those American giants who come across [our] border.”

The former central banker, who now postures as a man of the people, made it clear that if the Liberals are re-elected, the federal government will intensify efforts to regulate what Canadians are allowed to see, say, and share online. His language was deliberate. Carney condemned what he called a “sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories” polluting Canada’s internet space—language borrowed directly from the Trudeau-era playbook. But this wasn’t just a moral denunciation. It was a legislative preview.

Carney spoke of a future Liberal government taking “action on those American giants who come across our borders.” Translation: he wants to bring Big Tech platforms under federal control, or at least force them to play the role of speech enforcers for the Canadian state. He blamed the United States for exporting “hate” into Canada, reinforcing the bizarre Liberal narrative that the greatest threat to national unity isn’t foreign actors like the CCP or radical Islamists—it’s Facebook memes and American podcasts.

But the most revealing moment came when Carney linked online speech directly to violence. He asserted that digital “pollution” affects how Canadians behave in real life, specifically pointing to conjugal violence, antisemitism, and drug abuse. This is how the ground is prepared for censorship: first by tying speech to harm, then by criminalizing what the state deems harmful.

What Carney didn’t say is just as important. He made no distinction between actual criminal incitement and political dissent. He offered no assurance that free expression—a right enshrined in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms—would be respected. He provided no definition of what constitutes a “conspiracy theory” or who gets to make that determination. Under this framework, any criticism of government policy, of global institutions, or of the new technocratic order could be flagged, throttled, and punished.

And that’s the point.

Mark Carney isn’t interested in dialogue. He wants obedience. He doesn't trust Canadians to discern truth from fiction. He believes it’s the job of government—his government—to curate the national conversation, to protect citizens from wrongthink, to act as referee over what is and isn’t acceptable discourse. In short, he wants Ottawa to become the Ministry of Truth.

Why They Don’t Actually Care About Antisemitism

The Liberal establishment talks a big game about fighting hate—but when it comes to actual antisemitic violence, they’ve shown nothing but selective enforcement and political cowardice.

Let’s look at the facts.

In 2023, B’nai Brith Canada recorded nearly 6,000 antisemitic incidents, including 77 violent attacks—from firebombed synagogues to shots fired at Jewish schools in Montreal and Toronto. This wasn’t a marginal increase. It was a 208% spike in violent antisemitism in a single year.

Statistics Canada echoed the same alarm bells. Jews—who make up just 1% of Canada’s population—were the victims of 70% of all religiously motivated hate crimes. That’s nearly 900 recorded incidents, up 71% from the previous year. Then came October 2023, when Hamas launched its attack on Israel—and the wave of hate turned into a tsunami: a 670% increase in antisemitic incidents across the country. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centers were hit with bomb threats, arson attempts, and intimidation campaigns. This was a national security issue, not just a policing matter.

And yet, the government's response? Virtually nonexistent.

Case in point: the Montreal Riot, November 2024. A 600-person mob, waving anti-NATO and pro-Palestinian banners, turned violent—setting fires, smashing windows, and attacking police. Amid this chaos, a man was filmed screaming “Final Solution”—a direct reference to the Nazi plan to exterminate the Jews. It went viral. There was no ambiguity, no misunderstanding. It was a public call for genocide.

So what happened?

Three arrests. None for hate crimes. None related to antisemitism. Montreal Police Chief Fady Dagher insisted there were “no confirmed antisemitic acts,” and as of early 2025, no hate crime charges have been filed against the individual caught on camera.

That man, as it turns out, owned a Second Cup franchise. His punishment? His café was shut down by the company. Not by law enforcement. Not by hate crime investigators. A corporate HR department showed more backbone than Canada’s justice system.

And this is what reveals the truth: they don’t care. They’ll enforce hate speech laws when it’s politically convenient—when it can be used to silence critics, crush dissent, or placate woke constituencies. But when Jewish communities are being threatened, attacked, and terrorized? The same laws suddenly go limp. The same political class that claims to protect minorities becomes paralyzed. They won’t touch it. Because confronting real antisemitism would require standing up to their political allies in activist circles, university campuses, and radical protest movements.

This isn't an accident. It's a pattern.

The Liberals aren’t weak on antisemitism because they’re unaware of it. They’re weak on it because they don’t see political value in enforcing the law when it conflicts with their ideological allies. Their obsession isn’t with hate speech—it’s with controlling “wrong” speech. And what qualifies as “wrong” isn’t defined by law or principle. It’s defined by what the Liberal establishment deems unacceptable.

Their target isn’t violent bigotry. It’s dissent. They’ll chase down citizens for questioning carbon taxes or criticizing globalist policy—but when Jewish schools get shot at, or someone calls for genocide in the street, they shrug.

This isn’t leadership. It’s selective justice. And it proves, beyond any doubt, that their agenda was never about protecting Canadians. It was always about protecting control.

The Online Harms Act: Carney’s Blueprint for Speech Control

This isn’t hypothetical. Mark Carney’s remarks in Hamilton mirror the exact logic and intent behind the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63)—legislation drafted under the Liberal banner and introduced in 2024 that pushes Canada into territory no free society should accept.

At its core, Bill C-63 hands the federal government sweeping powers to police digital speech. It creates a Digital Safety Commission, an unelected bureaucratic authority empowered to monitor, investigate, and punish online platforms and individuals for content deemed "harmful." That word—harmful—is never concretely defined. It includes things like “hate speech,” “conspiracy theories,” and vague notions of “harm to children,” but it’s written broadly enough to be used as a political weapon.

The most chilling provision? Preemptive imprisonment. Under this law, Canadians could be jailed for up to a year—without having committed a crime—if a judge believes they might post something harmful in the future. This isn’t law enforcement. This is thought policing.

Carney didn’t just echo this approach—he amplified it. In his Hamilton rally, he described the internet as being flooded with “misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories,” and laid blame on foreign content “washing over our borders from the United States.” He didn’t argue for open debate or for empowering users to challenge dangerous ideas. He argued for the state to intervene and shut them down.

He told Canadians that these ideas are “changing how people behave” and claimed his government will go after “those American giants” that allow this content to circulate. There’s no ambiguity here: this is a public declaration that a Liberal government under Mark Carney intends to censor, de-platform, and penalize dissenting views. Not illegal ones—just ones they don't like.

And this isn’t new for him. Back in 2022, during the Freedom Convoy, Carney referred to protesters as committing “sedition” and demanded the government “thoroughly punish” them. These weren’t violent rioters or foreign agitators—these were working-class Canadians honking their horns and standing in the cold, protesting vaccine mandates. For Carney, their real crime was disobedience.

Carney’s view of speech is simple: if it challenges the ruling order, it’s dangerous. And now, with Bill C-63 on the table and Carney at the helm, he’s building the legal infrastructure to lock down the digital public square—not to protect Canadians from violence, but to protect the Liberal establishment from criticism.

That law is real. Carney’s agenda is real. And if he wins, enforcement is coming.

Final thoughts

This is the Canada Mark Carney envisions—one where citizens can’t speak freely online without first checking their views against government guidelines. A country where speech is no longer a right but a privilege granted by bureaucrats. A country where opposition isn’t argued with, it’s labeled harmful and erased.

There was a time when Liberals championed civil liberties. That era is over. The new Liberalism is authoritarian—cloaked in the language of safety and inclusion, but animated by control. Carney’s rally in Hamilton wasn’t a policy rollout. It was a warning to anyone who still thinks they live in a country where dissent is allowed.

They don’t want to fight hate. They want to define “wrong” speech—and then eliminate it. And by “wrong,” they mean anything the Liberal establishment disapproves of. Criticize the government, question the orthodoxy, challenge the state’s narrative, and you’ll be branded a threat. Not a citizen. Not a participant. A threat.

So here we are.

The speech laws are written. The censors are waiting. And Mark Carney is ready to pull the trigger.

This election isn’t about tax credits or campaign slogans. It’s about whether Canada remains a free country or slides deeper into soft tyranny, one regulation, one commission, one silenced voice at a time.

There is a choice. And the choice is this: bring it home—restore freedom, restore sanity, restore this country.

Or: hand the keys to the same people who think you’re the problem for having the nerve to think for yourself.

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@BradLam74471068 Are you? But Brock is

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@BradLam74471068 Happy birthday fella , keep on keeping on !!

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@LMcLachlan60 This was a productive farm , this whole thing is about as green as a tire fire!!!

[Tokyo Rosie @tokyorosiecr]

Can you move too far left? Yes, you can, and Canada is evidence of that. We have become a cautionary tale to the rest of the world. Thanks, Justin.

[Belleville General Hospital Foundation @bghfoundation]

Sandra & Terry O’Neill, Patrick O’Neill, Karen & Dexter Harder, and Larry Hutchinson, from TCO Agromart Ltd., raised $5220 for the BGH Oncology Department through their recent 'Cookies for Cancer' fundraiser in support of coworker Sarah Wilson. Read more https://t.co/tZ5gWF8XxL

[Concerned Canadian @Concern70732755]

It’s unfortunate however reality that PM Trudeau has become an international Joke -gone are the days that Canadian politicians were trusted, respected& many wanted to emulate. Trudeau has made himself joke material & denigrated Canada’s image

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@JustinTrudeau Will you ever answer a question with a straight answer, it would be a refreshing change to the ring around the Rosie answer that usually pours out of your mouth. Yes or No will do!!!

[Bronson @AdeDetective]

Watch this then tell me more about how unsafe unvaccinated drivers are...

[Concerned Canadian @Concern70732755]

The Freedom Convoy represented hope & patriotism. It revealed that we had a voice and a role for advocacy against an oppressive & authoritarian Govt that denigrated both our civil & human rights! Retweet if you concur !

[Double Alpha Dame @DoubleAlphaDame]

OMG 😆 Who did this? 🤣💀

[for the love of ag @mdhazen]

So @FoodProfessor has a history of bullying and harassment. His dirty secret. https://t.co/gyJCtdAMdQ

[Old Hockey Cards @oldhockeycards]

Yeah well.. If my aunt had nuts she’d be my uncle…
#Grapes

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@BradLam74471068 @DEKALB_Canada @Bayer4CropsCA That’s for sure cold pints looking over good crops
#nothingbetter

[The Post Millennial @TPostMillennial]

Former Minister of Agriculture Gerry Ritz @GerryRitzxMP:

"I think Trudeau's banning fertilizer to that degree because he spreads enough himself."

[Robert Vermilyea @VeryeaFarms]

@edge27 @BradLam74471068 @bucket8270 Would be much better with a Deere involved

[Senator Colin Deacon 🇨🇦🇺🇦 @colindeacon]

Compelling analysis of prices at the three oligopolies with 60% of 🇨🇦 grocery sales. The Star examined the prices charged & found that the bulk of price increases are going to increased margins & profits for retailers, not farmers. #CompetitionMatters! https://t.co/aMSUO4S8N8