VeyaTrades

Journaling my road to a million-dollar prop trader. Every trade. Every mistake. Every emotion.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

Journal to a million-dollar prop firm trader.

That's the description. That's literally what this is.

Every trade I take gets posted here. Why I took it. What I was reading. What I got wrong. The wins and the ones I fumbled.

So when I get there, nobody can tell me I was planted in the matrix. The whole journey will be documented.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE BACKGROUND

Started in crypto. Made money there.

Moved into options — never really loved it; the Greeks always annoyed me. I'll still post a few though.

Tried futures for about a week and fell off completely.

Then things started clicking.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHO SHAPED THIS

→ @Tradermayne
Years of his content taught me how to actually read a chart.

→ @jadecap_
Liquidity sweeps. Previous day high, previous day low. Simple. I tested it. It works.

→ @chartfanatics
Auction market theory, order flow, and the Volume Profile. This is what took me over the cliff.

→ @itsjjsimon
Showed me the real math behind prop firms. Scaling and running accounts in bulk is where the money actually is.
━━━━━━━━━━

IF I COULD TELL ANYONE TO LEARN TWO THINGS

-> Auction market theory.
-> The Volume Profile (VP).

Once you understand that the market is an auction moving from balance to imbalance — and you understand where liquidity sits — you'll never look at a chart the same way again.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEFT BEHIND

EMAs, RSI, MACD, bullish and bearish divergence, trying to call tops and bottoms.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHERE I'M AT

-> Trading mainly NQ & ES.
-> Farming prop firm accounts.
-> Mastering order flow.
-> Building a bot to backtest my strategies and making them stronger.

Mostly though? Just chart time. Not trying to overcomplicate it.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

FIVE GREEN DAYS TO START OCTOBER

Last month ended in the red. This month, every
day has been green so far. No losing day yet.
━━━━━━━━━━

FIRST, AN APOLOGY

I haven't been consistent in posting. I'm trying to
document this whole journey, the real one, and
some days it takes everything out of me. I'm
working on showing up more.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE REAL LESSON

Trading is a psychology game.....

- I have the need to always be in a trade
- I've tilted. I've overtraded
- I've given back good days chasing a few
dollars back

For a month straight I've lived in charts and
videos, forgetting there's a life outside the
screen. This consumes you if you let it.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT'S CLICKING

- Absorption and exhaustion at key levels
- Call and put walls lining up with the value
area edges
- Inversions
- The 1H opening range breakout finally working

And something bigger: I can sit in a trade now.
I set my stop, I trust it, and I let it work.
That calm is new.
━━━━━━━━━━

TODAY'S MISTAKE

Had a great opening range trade working. Moved
my stop up and placed an order to add. Price hit
the stop first, then the add, and I was in a
position I never meant to take. Then I took a
revenge trade to win it back.

Both of my bad moments this week came from
touching a winner.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE EVAL

Still grinding. My losses are still bigger than
my wins. But I went from a red September to
green every day in October.

The leak isn't my reads. It's my exits. Moving
stops, adding to winners, needing to be in. Fix
that, and the numbers follow.
━━━━━━━━━━

Still green. Still here. Journal continues.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

@DodgysDD @CandyTheTrader who were the other 3?

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

LOSER: TWO-DAY RECAP — OCT 1 → OCT 2
Net: −$10
GRADE: C (Day 1 B+ / Day 2 D)
━━━━━━━━━━

THE BACKDROP
- Ended September tilting. Sized up, widened stops, overtraded
- Gave back $777 in a week.
- Goal coming into October: small size, fewer trades, rebuild
━━━━━━━━━━

FRI OCT 2:
- 6 MNQ trades · 4W / 2L · 66.67%
- Trade 1: +$131.50. Great start
- Trade 2: −$123. Gave back the whole morning on the very next trade

- Spent the rest of the day trying to win it back, flipping long and short

- 13:00 long at the value area low, stop under the sweep low: −$209. Closed it early on a live read. The stop never got hit. Price came back

- Winners: $176. Losers: $332. 66% win rate and still red
━━━━━━━━━━

THE REAL PROBLEM

- Not the setups. The tilt
- Underneath it: the urge to pass the eval. The profit target pulling me into trades the chart didn't give me
- 4 of 6 trades after 11:30. One at 3:36pm
- Too many inputs at once: delta profile, CVD, gamma regime, volume profile. Learning while executing.

Whatever I looked at last won the argument
━━━━━━━━━━

FROM HTF TO LTF

I came up trading the daily and the 1H. Bias from the daily, entry off the hourly

Order flow pulled me down to the 1m, 2m, 3m. Completely different game

Everything happens at once: read the regime, find the level, watch the prints, line up confluence, then get in and out in seconds

On the hourly I had time to think. On the 1m, by the time I've processed it, the move is gone

Super taxing. By the afternoon, I wasn't reading anymore, I was reacting
━━━━━━━━━━

THE ORDER FLOW JOURNEY

Going deep on order flow. @TraderYush | @andreacimi | Fabio Valentini has been huge shaping my order flow journey.

Software: DeepCharts @Deepcharts

Learning gamma regime:
- positive = levels hold, fade the edges.
- negative = levels break, go with the move

Learning to read absorption at key levels and what CVD actually tells you

Tested the IVB/ORB. It worked, but moved so fast I couldn't get in
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

Win rate means nothing if one loser eats four winners

The stop is the plan. Don't renegotiate it mid-trade

Two setups. One key level at a time. Nothing in the middle of the range
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS BETTER

- Stop trading after trade 2 gave back the morning
- No early exit
- No trades after the cutoff.
- Only trade at levels
━━━━━━━━━━

EVAL TALLY: 28 trades · 50% win rate

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

@tradermike1234 I just signed up a few minutes ago. Does that mean I probably won't get a spot?

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

LOSER(S): EVAL WEEK 2 RECAP — SEP 24 → SEP 30

Sep 24 → Sep 30, 2026

SETUP: none. This one's about psychology

GRADE: D
━━━━━━━━━━

FIRST, AN APOLOGY

Haven't posted since Sep 23. A full week of silence.
I said I'd journal every day and I didn't.

I should have posted the results anyway. Instead, I disappeared into education.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHERE I WENT

Joined two trading communities over the weekend.
Not naming them, and not posting their setups. Those edges aren't mine to share.

One is close to how I already trade, just hunts lower levels of liquidity. Picked it up in under a day.

The other is very different. Still learning it.

No regrets joining. I regret letting the content eat my whole week.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE WEEK

Fri 9/25: -$210, 1 trade
Mon 9/28: -$156, 3 trade
Tue 9/29: +$22.75, 6 trades
Wed 9/30: -$737, 4 trades, 0 winners

14 trades this week. 4 winners.
Avg win $92.70. Avg loss $130.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WENT WRONG

My setup shows up maybe once a week. Sometimes once every two weeks.

I looked at a $3,000 target, did the math, and saw a month to pass. It drove me crazy.

So I went hunting for intraday setups, and it went like this:

- I'm a daily/hourly trader. I moved down to the 1m and 5m, where it chops
- Went from 1-2 contracts to 3-4
- Got stopped, got mad, gave the next trade "breathing room." Moved the stop above the high. Then above the next high
- Gave back profit, so I went big to get it back
- 1-2 trades a day turned into 5-6
- I was checking charts in my sleep

Wednesday's -$520 short was all of it in one trade.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WENT RIGHT

My read on where price wants to go held up. The setup I saw at London and skipped to get sleep ran almost 200 points.
The edge isn't broken. The execution is.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

Trading is 90% psychology. I knew that. Knowing it didn't save me.

The need to get funded broke me, not the market.

I made the timeline the goal instead of the process.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT CHANGES NOW

- Both evals locked. No trading next session
- Back to 1-2 contracts, ~$200 risk
- Stops only move toward profit. Never away
- Sleep
━━━━━━━━━━

LOOKING AHEAD

Posting my calendar daily while I reset. No trades to show, and that's the point.

Any trade I take with my own method still gets posted in full.
━━━━━━━━━━

Eval: 18 trades, 39% win rate

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

WINNER: EVAL DAY 2 — MNQ LONG #2: +0.3R

September 23, 2026, 14:23 to 15:10

SETUP: PDL sweep reclaim

GRADE: C
━━━━━━━━━━

DAILY BIAS

Bullish. Same read all day; price reclaimed the previous day's low in the morning and held it.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE DECISION

I said I wouldn't overtrade today, and then I took a third trade. The setup was clean, so I convinced myself the rule didn't apply.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE CONFLUENCE.

Liquidity sweep at previous day low. Change of structure on the five-minute. Bullish fair value gap. Higher highs and higher lows. Volume picking up, and the one-hour sweep had real volume behind it
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT HAPPENED

Price went straight into chop at the POC and sat there.
━━━━━━━━━━

MISTAKES

I entered at the POC, and I knew I was doing it. Second day in a row. I saw volume coming in and assumed we'd smash through, and instead price did exactly what price does at the POC. And I had no stop time. I'd been at the screen since 3:48 AM. Eleven hours in, I took a trade that required patience I'd already spent.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

The exit had nothing to do with the chart. I was mentally fatigued; I had a headache, and I would have taken a loss just to be out. That's not a read; that's exhaustion.

Being in trades all day is far more taxing than I thought. A break-even trade I couldn't sit in is the real loss here.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS AN A+

Not taking it. Entry above the POC instead of inside it. A hard cutoff: no new positions after noon on days I'm in from London.
━━━━━━━━━━

Eval: 4 trades, 75% win rate

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

LOSER: EVAL DAY 2 — MNQ LONG: −0.4R
Sep 23, 2026 · 11:17 → 11:51
SETUP: PDL sweep reclaim
GRADE: C+
━━━━━━━━━━

DAILY BIAS
Still bullish. The morning drop was the manipulation leg (hoping), and the PDL sweep was the setup I came in wanting for the push higher
━━━━━━━━━━

THE DECISION
Mean sweep of the PDL. MNQ closed back above its PDL, MES didn't. So MNQ was the long

Waited for the 1H close instead of chasing
━━━━━━━━━━

THE CONFLUENCE
-> 1H PDL sweep and reclaim
-> 5m bullish FVG, entry at the consequent encroachment
-> Volume came in at the FVG
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT HAPPENED

-> Volume tapered off, and price started making lows. Felt over-leveraged
-> Sold 1 contract (+9 pts) to cut size
-> Moved the stop to the body of the FVG instead of the wick
━━━━━━━━━━

MISTAKES
Went heavier on 2 contracts, then let the size make me nervous
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED
A bullish FVG holding on no volume means buyers aren't showing up. That's not a re-entry
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS AN A+
A size I can sit through without flinching
━━━━━━━━━━

Eval · Trades: 3 · Win rate: 67%

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

WINNER: EVAL DAY 2 — MNQ SHORT: +6.4R

Sep 23, 2026 · 03:48 → 09:47

SETUP: PDH / overnight high sweep

GRADE: B
━━━━━━━━━━

DAILY BIAS

Bullish. Panel read Long on MNQ and MES going in
Thesis: price had to go lower first to take liquidity.

London should be the manipulation leg, the wick before the body
━━━━━━━━━━

THE DECISION

- Took it on NQ, not ES. ES was sitting at the POC, and the POC is chop. Yesterday's lesson, applied
━━━━━━━━━━

THE CONFLUENCE

- Double top in London
- Liquidity sweep against the previous day high
- ES showing a ton of weakness
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT HAPPENED

-> Sell limit filled at 03:48, went back to sleep
-> Woke up around +$250, then watched it give back to +$150 while price swept the POC on no volume and ES swept its VAL

-> Got nervous and went to close it. Deleted my stop by mistake instead. Put it back and sat in it
-> Price pushed through the value area low. Trailed the stop, moved the target lower
-> Closed at 30,886.50 at 09:47 when it looked like a sweep

-> Price kept going to the PDL within the hour. Left ~95 pts. Emotions stayed in check
━━━━━━━━━━

MISTAKES

Nearly closed a working trade on nerves
Exited on a feeling, not a planned level
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

-> The POC filter works. Skipped ES, took NQ
-> A London manipulation leg is tradeable when the thesis is formed ahead of time
-> A pullback on no volume is a stall, not a reversal. Sitting through it paid
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS AN A+

-> Hands off the position once the stop is set
-> Partials at the POC and VAL instead of one all-or-nothing exit
━━━━━━━━━━

Eval · Trades: 2 · Win rate: 100%

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

WINNER: EVAL DAY 1 — MES SHORT: +0.1R

Sep 22 · 10:00 → 16:09

SETUP: PDH / overnight high sweep

GRADE: B-
━━━━━━━━━━

DAILY BIAS

Panel said long. All six rows, both symbols.

NQ gave me the cleaner setup. Swept the FVG with volume, bounced off the 1H bull OB, draw on liquidity higher. 2.7R sitting there.

I passed. Didn't like longing into previous day high with the POC underneath and no room overhead. Then it ran without me.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE DECISION

Fifteen minutes later I shorted ES. Against my own bias panel, against the trend, on a bullish day.

I can be honest about why, partly because I missed the first one.

Not a random trade. Real evidence behind it. But the bar I held NQ to isn't the bar I held this one to, and that's the part worth writing down.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE CONFLUENCE

Swept the previous day high. Swept the 1H high. Swept the overnight high. Premium of the range, 1.0 relative volume on the sweep with absorption, three-candle pattern closing below the prior body.
The one thing I didn't like: the POC was right there.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE PLAN

Risked $150 to make $750. Same on both accounts.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT HAPPENED

Six hours at the POC.

Up about $225 at one point. Didn't take it. Down about $255 at one point. Hated it. Sat in it anyway.

Auto-flatten closed me at 4:10 for 2 points. +$34.20 net across both accounts.
━━━━━━━━━━

MISTAKES

Traded at the POC. Price was stalling there, and I took it anyway.

The POC is a chop zone. Highest volume price on the chart means both sides agree there, which means no draw and no follow-through. Avoid it, especially when price is already stalling in it.

Commissions ate 15% of gross. That's what six hours of chop costs you.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

I sat in a trade all day when every part of me wanted out. Last week that was the leak. Today it wasn't.

Green on day one of the eval. Small, but it's the right kind of small.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS AN A+

Taking the NQ long. The R:R was there.
Not entering at the POC.

━━━━━━━━━━

Eval Day 1 · 1 trade · +$34.20

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

2x 50K EVALS. STARTED TODAY.

First funded challenge. Lucid and MyFundedFutures, both 50K, same rules, same risk on each.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE SETUP

Charting on @TradingView.
Journaling on @TradeZella.
Copy trading through Tradecopia — one execution, both accounts.

Same process that got me here, just with consequences attached.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE PLAN

Trust the system. Be patient. Take the setups that price right and pass the ones that don't.
━━━━━━━━━━

Nervous. Confident. Both.

Journal continues.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

WEEK 1 — Journal to a million-dollar prop firm trader

Sep 15 → Sep 19

6 trades · 4W / 2L · 67% · +$1,680.55
━━━━━━━━━━

THE ACCOUNT

Paper. On purpose.

I'm running an eval Monday, and I needed to know whether the edge is real before I put money behind it. So I traded sim like it was my own bread. Sized it real, took the losses real, sat in the drawdowns real.

My girl watched me this week and thought it was a live account. That's the standard I wanted.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WORKED

The cancelled ones are the week. SFP shorts against my bias. A CrowdStrike breakout where the stop was too far for a 1:1.5R. Setups that looked good and didn't price well.

Every trade I took, my read was right—all six.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT DIDN'T

My exits.

One contract means no partials. It's all or nothing, and when a trade goes green and shows the first sign of weakness, my hands get shaky and I exit.

Trade #6 I closed 26 points early. Same story every time.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE FIX

Size. With more contracts (obviously with proper risk management), I can pull some off, make it risk-free, and let the rest run.
━━━━━━━━━━

NEXT WEEK

Eval starts Monday.

Same process. Same journal. Real rules this time.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

WINNER: TRADE #6 — MES LONG: +1.4R

Sep 18 · 13:00 → 15:01

SETUP: VAL sweep reclaim

GRADE: B
━━━━━━━━━━

DAILY BIAS

Daily 2 candle pattern bull, 1H structure bull, VP bias bull. Five of six rows on my panel agreed.

The morning gave me shorts instead. MES swept the previous day high with volume and rejected. MNQ set up the same thing. AAPL took out its high and got hammered.

I didn't take any of them. Every setup works in both directions. An SFP is valid in a bull market and a bear market, which is exactly what makes it dangerous when it shows up against your read.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE DECISION

By the time price came into the value area low, 1H structure had flipped bear. Daily was already bear. I took a long against higher timeframe structure because the evidence at that level was better than the structure above it.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE CONFLUENCE

Swept the previous day low. Swept the 1H range low. Landed in a 1H bullish order block. Volume on the sweep. Thin below, POC and value area high above with room to run.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE PLAN

Risked $70 to make $240.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT HAPPENED

Trailed my stop once it moved in my favor. Zero risk on the table.

Price reached the value area high and swept it. Weakness showed. Friday afternoon, an hour of real volume left, higher timeframe bears with an obvious place to show up.

Closed for 20.25 points. $99.

MES ran another 14 points without me. MNQ, the setup I passed on because it had no sweep and no volume, ran the hardest of anything on my screen.
━━━━━━━━━━

MISTAKES

Exited on a value area high sweep that turned out to be a pause, not distribution. I read weakness into a level instead of waiting for the level to prove it.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

I got impatient. I need to sit in a trade and trust my own analysis.

But I'd rather be a disciplined trader at a 20 percent win rate than an undisciplined one at 100 percent. Over enough trades the disciplined one wins every time.

Unrealized profit is not profit.

My process picked the trade with better evidence. The market paid the trade with better structure.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS AN A+

Aligning with higher timeframes.
Sitting through the trade.
━━━━━━━━━━

Trades: 6 · Win rate: 67% ( 4W / 2L)

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

DISCIPLINE: THREE SETUPS I DIDN'T TAKE

Friday, September 18

Last night during TA, I told myself I'm looking for longs.

Every read I had except one pointed that way.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE CONFLICT

Daily structure: bear.
1H structure: bull.
2-candle: bull.
VP bias: bull.

Five of six rows said long. So long was the plan.

Then the market spent the whole morning offering me shorts.
━━━━━━━━━━

MES

5am.
Swept PDH. Clean SFP short, but I didn't take it. It's currently in profit.

MNQ

Happening as I type this. Same sweep, same rejection. Already 64 points onside. Not in it.

AAPL

Swept PDH on a huge hourly candle, now heading for PDL. By the time that candle closed, the risk-reward was garbage. I was tempted to ape it.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

Every setup works in both directions. An SFP is valid in a bull market and a bear market. That's exactly what makes it dangerous — it'll show up on the wrong side of your thesis and look perfect.

Being right and being paid aren't the same thing. On AAPL, I'd have been right and still lost, because waiting for confirmation meant entering after the move with the stop miles away.

The moment you start taking setups that contradict your own read, you're not running a framework anymore.

You're just reacting.
━━━━━━━━━━

Genuine question for anyone who's further along than me: when higher timeframe structure disagrees with everything below it, do you side with structure and take the trade? Or do you go with the consensus of your lower timeframe reads and sit on your hands as I did?

Still figuring this out. Hands stayed off today.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

TOOL: BIAS & TRADE IDEA PANEL

Built this for myself, sharing it because a few people asked how I keep top-down analysis straight during the day.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE PROBLEM

Running top-down analysis across multiple charts, it's easy to lose track of what you already concluded. Was daily structure actually bullish? What did the 1H say? You get to a level, and you're not sure if you're taking a real setup or just anchoring to price.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE FIX

A panel that sits on the chart. You fill in your own read for:

Daily Structure
1H Structure
Daily 2 Candle Pattern
VA State
VP Bias
Trade Idea

Everything color-codes itself. Bull, bear, neutral.
━━━━━━━━━━

HOW TO USE IT

Add it to your chart, open Settings, and set your read for each symbol you trade with the dropdowns.

The panel detects which chart you're on and flips to that symbol's read on its own.

Fair warning, it's rough. Pine Script can't save data per symbol, so this is a workaround, not an elegant solution.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHY IT WORKS

When most rows agree, that's your bias at a glance. When they're split, that's your signal to slow down and not force anything. Keeps me honest about what I actually see versus what I want to see.
━━━━━━━━━━

One thing I couldn't crack: Pine Script won't let you drag the panel around like a native drawing tool. You reposition it through Settings instead. If anyone has figured out how to make a table freely movable, I want to know.

Script in the replies. Free, no strings.

[VeyaTrades @VeyaTrades]

LOSER: TRADE #5 — MES SHORT: -0.41R

Sep 17 · 11:00 → 16:59

SETUP: PDH sweep
━━━━━━━━━━

Question for @jadecap_ and anybody else who wants to weigh in: if previous day high gets lost and then reclaimed, is the short position now invalid? My guess is no — reclaim and then lose again is still fine, because the stop belongs above the SFP high, not at PDH itself. But I'd like to hear it from people who've traded it longer than me.
━━━━━━━━━━

DAILY BIAS

Bearish. Yesterday's daily candle closed bearish. Market structure was bearish — price trading inside a bearish order block. Direction was valid.
━━━━━━━━━━

THE DECISION

10:30 candle sweeps PDH with volume and gets rejected. Sellers step in, absorption into a weak volume node. Short 2 contracts at 7,686.50 at 11:00.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT HAPPENED

Went against me almost immediately and never came back. Price ground higher all afternoon.

Net: -$165.10
Time in trade: 5h 58m
PSYCHOLOGY

This is the part I'm actually happy about. I sat in it.

Two hours in I was afraid of losing $400 and I started building the case for moving my stop down to protect profit that didn't exist. That's the exact move that cost me trade #3. I recognized it and I sat.

Then I got up and took a shower, because staring at a chart between hourly closes doesn't help. It just makes me negotiate with myself.

Losing trade. Good day.
━━━━━━━━━━

MISTAKES

I entered at POC. 7,680.50 was the point of control on both the daily and the 1H and I put my entry 6 points from it. Fat volume nodes are where price parks. You enter FROM them, not AT them.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS A+

The entry timing was right — entering on the candle that caused the SFP is the method. The problem was location. The POC was sitting 6 points below my entry, which meant price had a parking lot in its path before it could go anywhere.

The A+ version isn't a different entry. It's the same candle, same method — but with the POC further away. Either the setup exists at a cleaner level next time, or I see the POC proximity before I pull the trigger and downgrade the trade before I'm even in it.
━━━━━━━━━━

WHAT I LEARNED

I've started marking overnight highs and lows as liquidity zones.

Acceptance without participation is its own signal. Volume built above PDH all afternoon but relative volume never expanded. Nobody was pressing. Price was being allowed higher, not pushed higher — sellers stopped defending rather than buyers taking over.

New bias filter I'm testing: score market structure, volume profile, daily candle, and 1H. Majority wins. Two-two, no trade. Scored before entry, in writing, not after.
━━━━━━━━━━

Trades: 5 · Win rate: 60% (3W / 2L) · Grade: B