Vidhieie

living but barely !

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

Corporate treasuries operating across African borders lock up millions of dollars in pre-funded accounts. This guarantees liquidity in destination markets. But in turn this capital sits idle and cannot support daily operations.

Stablecoin infrastructure changes this model. Stablecoins are tokens on a blockchain that track the value of the US dollar. They allow treasuries to adopt a just-in-time liquidity model.

Here is how this model works for businesses:

- Capital is held in a single secure wallet instead of spreading it across multiple countries.
- When a payment is due, you send stablecoins directly to the recipient.
- The recipient converts the stablecoins to local currency immediately.
- Your funds only exist in the local currency for minutes instead of weeks.

This approach provides three immediate benefits:

- It frees up dormant capital to support business growth.
- It reduces exposure to local currency depreciation.
- It improves working capital efficiency.

Sources: McKinsey & Company, Visa, Faster Payments Council.

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

A new @BIS_org Bank for International Settlements – BIS working paper studied 130+ economies and found something worth paying attention to: capital controls work on bank deposits. They don't work on stablecoins.

Here's what the data showed:

- Countries that restrict foreign currency deposits see 29 to 32 percentage point lower dollarisation. Similar restrictions on stablecoins? No measurable impact.

- After a banking crisis, stablecoin inflows rise. People losing trust in banks move to assets that live outside the banking system.

- Once stablecoin adoption takes hold in a country, it stays. The pattern mirrors how deposit dollarisation has historically been nearly impossible to reverse.

- Stablecoins and dollar deposits largely serve different users, so stablecoin growth is adding to dollarisation, not just reshaping it.

The reason capital controls fail here is structural. FX restrictions are enforced at the bank. Stablecoins move through wallets, sitting entirely outside that perimeter.

For banks, fintechs, and cross-border payment companies operating in APAC and MENA, compliance now has to live at the wallet layer. That means AML screening, Travel Rule checks, and licensed custody built into the infrastructure holding the asset. That is what Liminal is built for.

for more details, please check out - https://t.co/vmIujzt6e3

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

For businesses processing USDT on TRON, every transaction comes with a recurring cost that your finance team notices when auditing the numbers. TRX burns on every transfer, and moving funds between wallets adds to it.

TRON Advantage addresses that directly. Stake TRX to earn approximately 3.6% APR while generating energy for active wallets. That energy routes automatically so transfers stop consuming TRX. The cost of moving funds between wallets drops by up to 30%.

Now live on Liminal.

Stake. Delegate. Optimise. One platform.

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

Finance teams at crypto exchanges and financial institutions will appreciate this.

TRON Advantage is now live on Liminal.

If your business processes high volumes of USDT transfers on TRON, transaction fees can become a significant operational cost.

For example, at 100K transfers per month, you could be spending around 700K TRX on network fees alone. On top of that, the TRX held to fund these transactions typically sits idle.

TRON Advantage helps with both:

Stake
Put idle TRX to work and earn approximately 3.6% APR.

Delegate
Use Energy to power transactions instead of burning TRX for every transfer.

Optimise
Automatically rent Energy when it is more cost effective, reducing transaction costs from around 7 TRX to about 5 TRX per transfer.

At 100K transfers per month, that reduces fee consumption from approximately 700K TRX to 500,000 TRX, a saving of around 200K TRX i.e ~ 28% every month, before accounting for staking rewards.

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

What is a private key compromise?

It's when someone who shouldn't have access to a private key gets it. From that point on, they can move the funds the key controls and there's no way to undo it.

A private key authorises every transaction on a crypto wallet. One valid signature, and funds move. So when a key is stolen, leaked, or accessed by the wrong person, the person holding the key becomes, in effect, the owner of the funds.

Compromise can happen in many ways:

- Malware on a signer's machine extracting keys from memory
- Phishing or social engineering against authorised personnel
- Insider misuse by employees with elevated permissions
- Misconfigured cloud infrastructure exposing key material
- Compromised wallet software in the supply chain
- Operational mistakes in cold storage ceremonies

The result is the same in every case. Funds move. The breach is irreversible.

This is why private key compromise sits at the top of every digital asset risk register and why traditional defences (cold storage, hardware wallets, multi-sig) increasingly fall short. They're all variations of the same idea: protect the key. As long as a single key exists, it's protectable but also stealable.

MPC changes the model. Signing authority is split across multiple parties, so no party ever holds a complete key and no machine ever assembles one. There's nothing for an attacker to steal because the asset they go after no longer exists in one place.

Combined with signing controls, anomaly detection, and governance-aligned workflows, this is what embedded security at the infrastructure layer actually looks like.

Operations built this way don't just reduce exposure. They scale with confidence and hold up under regulatory scrutiny.

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

For CFOs and treasury teams evaluating stablecoins, the infrastructure requirements are not the same at every stage.

Stage one is settlement. Stablecoins move value between counterparties faster and at lower cost than traditional rails.

Stage two is treasury balance. Stablecoins are held alongside fiat, used to manage liquidity across jurisdictions and spread across markets.

Stage three is core infrastructure. Stablecoins are integrated into financial operations, subject to audit, compliance frameworks, and the same institutional-grade controls applied to every other treasury asset.

Most institutions enter at stage one. The ones moving to stage three without upgrading the underlying custody, compliance, and operational infrastructure are carrying risk that has not been formally assessed.

Each stage carries different risks and the infrastructure needs to keep pace.

[Vidhieie @Vidhi68200071]

Have a read - https://t.co/ATOx5229Kr

[Vidhieie @Vidhi68200071]

Insightful to know how MPC is more secure .

[Liminal Custody @liminalcustody]

Most institutions understand that MPC distributes signing authority. Fewer ask what happens if the signer approves a risky transaction.

What MPC actually changes about signing security:

◾️In traditional signing, a complete private key exists and must be protected at all times
◾️In multi-sig, multiple complete keys exist, each representing a separate point of compromise
◾️In MPC, no complete private key ever exists at any point in the signing process
◾️Signing happens through a computation across separate key shares held by independent parties
◾️Compromising one share produces nothing an attacker can use

For institutions evaluating signing infrastructure, this distinction changes the threat model entirely. There is no single target to compromise.

#MPC #MultiPartyComputation #SigningSecurity #DigitalAssetCustody #InstitutionalCrypto #Liminal

[DRS Unlocked @DRSunlocked]

From: nico2016@rosberg

To: totow@mercedes

Subject: lmao

Body text: lol

[Tommo @TommoMcCluskey]

If this isn't far enough alongside at the apex, i don't know what is.

Kimi's absolutely entitled to be pissed off.

[Mahir 🇹🇷🇬🇧 @ScrewderiaF1]

Canadian GP Sprint race in a nutshell

[mary ✧ @marydocharlito]

whole house going crazy

[Matt Gallagher @MattP1Gallagher]

Pretty mad the Russell/Antonelli turn 1 incident seemingly wasn't even investigated

[Vidhieie @Vidhi68200071]

@SwiggyCares I have had the problem with all my orders from past month.

[Vidhieie @Vidhi68200071]

@lets_getitt @colors @EndemolShineIND @BeingSalmanKhan

[Vidhieie @Vidhi68200071]

@BiggBossDude @BeingSalmanKhan

[Vidhieie @Vidhi68200071]

@savagebutsassy True that. @BeingSalmanKhan

[Shubham2.0 @bhav_paaji]

All you Pakistanis who are saying nothing is happening we are safe is that because India is not attacking civilians you dumbfucks, attacking civilians is your job not ours

[Melissa Chen @MsMelChen]

Pakistan has enjoyed decades of global indulgence, especially from the West, and particularly from the Anglo-Saxon world thanks to historical and geopolitical quirks.

The West therefore bears some culpability for building up Pakistan’s terror industry. The Islamic world is way ahead of the West in recognizing the dangers posed by Pakistan to themselves. China too, despite its master-client relationship has shown signs of uneasiness with the trajectory of the Pakistani state (Chinese workers and engineers have been attacked by terror groups there).

The United States has provided Pakistan with substantial financial aid - nearly $78.3 billion between 1948 and 2016 - making it one of the largest recipients of U.S. assistance.

This insane largesse was meant to promote regional stability and counterterrorism efforts.

The results are plain for all to see. Not only is the region a hotbed of instability. The fact that we found Osama Bin Laden hiding out in Abbottobad, just a stone’s throw away from Pakistani military and government agency HQs, is something out of an absurd comedy sketch.

This is like spending billions in education only to see US students’ reading and math scores plummet. Or increasing healthcare spending only to see chronic disease rates steadily climb while lifespans shrink.

Defence trade between US and Pakistan has been furnished since 9/11 to the tune of $20 billion. We’re talking fighter jets (F-16s), missile frigates and attack helicopters.

Why is our foreign policy like the titanic, unable to change course from its Cold War trajectory?

The calls for equivalency between India and Pakistan once again just glosses over this fact: Pakistani-origin terrorism is a problem not just for India but globally as well, and it is financed and abetted by the state which is financed and abetted by the West.