I'm taking a stand for privacy.
Privacy is the missing key that will unlock new dimensions, expand opportunities, and finally bring the world onchain.
View my @aztecnetwork privacy glyph & create your own: https://t.co/Kiqe4D1iN9
I just verified that the contribution from 0xec1โฆaB7F was included in the ๐ฏ KZG Ceremony ๐ฏ output!
Transcript sha256 hash: 0x8ed1c73857e77ae98ea23e36cdcf828ccbf32b423fddc7480de658f9d116c848
Verify your own contribution and claim your POAP: https://t.co/7s0890XyKp
The blockchain of all blockchains.
We introduce, the BIGGEST & most INCLUSIVE claim you've ever seen.
Claim $DIAM for every action you've taken on top blockchains.
https://t.co/QASHFRFGWB
@Pashus07@PrimordialAA I think this is the right thing to do...there are many people who don't believe in the project at the very beginning of the journey...That's why the real and loyal people do at the beginning....
@PrimordialAA Bryan, how do you feel about giving a multiplier to users who have supported your project for 4-12 months or more? This would be much fairer than giving a multiplier to those who used your bridge after snapshot 1, because people watched the Bounty Hunt and were discouraged.
Also just want to say got a TON of feedback here, don't have time to respond to it all still working to get the Sybil list up tomorrow for public review but have heard everything and will make present some new runs tomorrow with the feedback overall based on these.
We started with 100k max (way too high) -> 50k -> 25k -> 10k and now we're starting to get into what seems like more reasonable territory just looking at the wallets and types of wallets that are being included there.
This run was min 50 which is obv a bit more restrictive but includes ~460k wallets since the max was lowered to 10k. Can show an example run with no multipliers tomorrow, and also with modified multipliers (a lot of people have had thoughts here, will put in some work with the data to try to see if x2 is too much overall for early, if x2 is too much for late, if early tx should be x3 but not account, etc.) -- can walk through the result from each. For now though, bed, finish sybil tomorrow and then march onwards
@PrimordialAA Hi...I'm in favor of option 1,3 because more wallets will pass that way...People deserve at least some kind of minimum after such bad giveaways and disappointments
Ok let's talk some numbers.
23.8% of the supply is going directly to the community and builders. This does not include foundation, growth, etc. Directly to community.
8.5% of this is being distributed day 1 (5% core, 3% RFP, 0.5% community pool)
The majority of the remainder will be given over the next 36 months with additional retroactive distribution every 12 months, along with some forward looking RFPs for builders.
What does distribution actually look like on day 1? We've been running a bunch of distro sims and given we haven't finalized the final sybil #s or the final RFP #s it's a bit hard to say exactly but a general shape is emerging.
These are before ANY sybil removal and ignoring any RFPs. I've toned down the number distributed in this to 7.5% to account for non-overlapping RFP/etc., so you can imagine this would be distro shape if it was strictly 7.5% for LZ Core.
6M starting addresses, 3M having only sent between 1-5 tx so assume those are mostly gone.
3M addresses remaining. Let's take an assumption of 0 sybil filtering and of 1M eligible addresses filtered (should have more exact #s on this later today)
25 min, model 1
Total entries: 847,332 (28.2% eligibility with 0 sybil filtering / 42.36% with 1M sybil filtered)
Entries with 25-100 tokens: 718,227 (Sum: 31,584,258.69)
Entries with > 100 - 1000 tokens: 124,103 (Sum: 29,308,527.08)
Entries with > 1000 - 10000 tokens: 4,813 (Sum: 9,275,407.31)
Entries with > 10000 tokens: 189 (Sum: 4,831,806.92)
50 min, model 1
Total entries: 440,149 (14.67% eligibility with 0 sybil filtering, 22.00% with 1M sybil filtered)
Entries with 50-100 tokens: 274,359 (Sum: 18,625,838.81)
Entries with > 100 - 1000 tokens: 158,695 (Sum: 37,329,913.21)
Entries with > 1000 - 10000 tokens: 6,861 (Sum: 13,069,599.75)
Entries with > 10000 tokens: 234 (Sum: 5,974,648.23)
25 min, model 2
Total entries: 823,376 (27.44% eligibility with 0 sybil filtering, 41.16% with 1M sybil filtered)
Entries with 25-100 tokens: 694,774 (Sum: 30,491,067.23)
Entries with > 100 - 1000 tokens: 122,448 (Sum: 29,352,999.82)
Entries with > 1000 - 10000 tokens: 5,997 (Sum: 11,420,971.35)
Entries with > 10000 tokens: 157 (Sum: 3,734,961.60)
50 min, model 2
Total entries: 424,462 (14.14% eligibility with 0 sybil filtering, 21.22% with 1M sybil filtered)
Entries with 50-100 tokens: 261,903 (Sum: 17,773,131.19)
Entries with > 100 - 1000 tokens: 154,205 (Sum: 36,763,465.73)
Entries with > 1000 - 10000 tokens: 8,161 (Sum: 15,811,837.36)
Entries with > 10000 tokens: 193 (Sum: 4,651,565.71)
14 - 42% eligibility roughly, min on core spread between 25 and 50 min, Numbers will continue to get more dialed in as final RFPs are cleaned up and sybil reports are finalized.
Would love to hear some thoughts
Check out @cherryonblast
@Blast_L2's first SocialFi project that rewards users for their X engagement.
https://t.co/Ywco8zchyw
Claim a LIMITED TIME sign up bonus using my referral here:
https://t.co/9LvwrnmhTO
@AntonProfiT@zksync 0xec167069931A5Ba78dc636846190F9026091aB7F
I'm not a sybil and I make one single wallet and I think it fits the criteria. Please double-check.
๐จToday the @zksync team announced an airdrop distribution and a story about what exactly this distribution will be for.
โ Criteria:
๐You are an active user and hold liquidity in some projects (pools, lendigs)
๐Your wallet has been active on the ZkSync Era network for more than 3 months
โ๏ธ There are also additional multipliers that increase the distribution:
๐ต Interaction with 10 smart contracts
๐ต 5 or more transactions in Paymaster
๐ต Trade 10 or more tokens in ZkSync
๐ต Be a holder of Omnibus NFT
๐ต Donations to Gitcoin (zkSync Lite)
๐ต Transactions on the Ethereum main network
โผ๏ธ And all this seems normal, but I have one important question: why are users who fully meet this criterion ultimately not eligible to receive awards?
I'm just sure that the ZkSync team made a mistake during the distribution and many eligible users end up with an "not eligible" status.
๐ซI speak for the majority of your community, your real users, and I ask you to at least give people the opportunity to appeal. You simply have to look at many wallets. They clearly deserve awards and it is not clear why their wallets are not eligible for an award when they meet absolutely all the requirements and criteria.
โผ๏ธI ask you to describe in more detail the criteria for receiving awards, so that everyone can understand why he is not worthy of receiving them. Because so far it all looks like those who have suffered are those who fully meet all the requirements.
โ๏ธI believe that you are not another @Starknet or @PolyhedraZK who treated their community like garbage and as a result are now receiving a response from their community. I will never use Starknet again and recommend everyone to do the same.
๐คPersonally, I have always considered ZkSync one of those projects that can replicate the guys from @arbitrum , which everyone loves and always remembers with warmth. I would be very upset if Twitter was littered with hashtags #zksyncscam or #zkscam and I hope that doesn't happen. No one will judge you if you make strict criteria and someone doesn't pass them. But the community will not be able to forgive the fact that many of the people fit all the criteria that you described, but in the end they will not receive the drop. I tried to explain in as much detail as possible the problem that exists now.
We look forward to your response and hope for the best!โ
The biggest release in Particle's history is now LIVE! โจ
We just rolled out Testnet Phase 1 of the Particle Network Modular L1, alongside Particle Pioneer: a community platform for rewarding Testnet participants.
Our Testnet features a high-speed EVM execution environment interconnecting multiple chains. It also debuts two Particle Network innovations:
๐ Universal Accounts, allowing users to have a single address across all blockchains.
โฝ๏ธ Universal Gas Token, allowing you to pay for gas on any chain after a single deposit, eliminating the need to hold multiple gas tokens.
๐ง Universal Liquidity, enabling automatic cross-chain transactions and swaps, will be introduced in Phase 2.
Meanwhile, with Particle Pioneer, you can earn $PARTI points. These entitle you to participate in our upcoming airdrop, earn rewards across multiple ecosystems, and other special benefits.
To begin earning points:
๐ฃGo to https://t.co/LB38vkcqHV.
๐ฃ Log in with a BTC or EVM wallet, or via your social accounts.
๐ฃ Enter an invite code. You can find one on Twitter, our Discord, etc. Make sure to avoid suspicious links!
๐ฃ Create a Universal Account, deposit Testnet assets, and send transactions using Universal Gas to earn PARTI points.
๐ฃ Boost your points rewards by holding community assets.
๐ฃ Leverage your points for bonuses on The People's Launchpad.
๐ฃ Stay on the lookout, as new tasks and bonuses will be added over time.
This release marks the beginning of our chain abstraction journey, one where we will attempt to take Web3's UX to the next level. Watch this account, as this is only the beginning!
Full details and an in-depth testing guide at: https://t.co/io0Wl0YyDx