Well, us in Greater Manchester have been left with £1.34bn debt, thanks to our new unelected PM, Andy Burnham. Just think what a mess he will make now he’s in charge of the country
Nobody has the right to live their lives being protected from offence, said Ann Widdecombe to an Oxford chamber of students that needed to hear it. God love her.
I didn’t mind if you were gay. Until you paraded in the streets in chaps and with dildos in front of families.
I didn’t care if you were trans. Until you wanted access to my kids in school and wanted them to question their own sexuality and gender.
I didn’t care if you were black or white or brown. Until you wanted to pull down statues, destroy our history, re-write our novels and pay you reparations.
I didn’t care if you wanted to cross borders. Until you decided to do so illegally and then started criminal enterprises in the country you entered or lived off the welfare system.
I even didn’t mind if you wanted an abortion, until you started celebrating them and calling the fœtus a “clump of cells”.
I am not the only one. There are millions of people just like me. And we are angry now and will fight back.
The line must be drawn here.
Someone asked me where my feelings for Islam come from. There’s the problem.
I don’t have “feelings” for Islam. I simply have facts about the religion.
They follow a man named Mohammed.
This man was a pedophile. He married a six year old and had sex with her when she was nine.
His teachings are ones that tell his followers to kill anyone who doesn’t believe in Islam.
He preached that you could lie to anyone who didn’t believe in Islam and tell them anything you felt like to convert them.
Islam treats women like shit. They have to wear burqas and are second-class citizens in every situation. It’s totally permissible to beat the living hell out of your wife for no reason.
Rape is also permissible to any woman who is not a Moslem. It’s literally a tool of war in Islam.
Mohammed’s followers also take on the role of “jihadist” in which they kill anyone who doesn’t believe in their religion.
They’ve convinced themselves that the best thing on earth is a black box and they pray to it five times a day in doggystyle position.
They won’t touch bacon and think it’s deadly.
They can’t use toilet paper.
They can’t even draw a picture of the Prophet they love so much. Must be an ugly dude!
They’ve even been convinced by their Pedophile Prophet that dogs are impure and dirty.
Now, these facts make it a pretty shitty religion if you ask me… and that would be fine if they practiced it in silence and didn’t try to impose it on others.
They have 55 countries where they are able to practice it, however flawed it may be. I don’t have to live there so that’s fine.
But they’ve decided to come to the West and want me to change my way of life to adapt to their way of life.
I’m supposed to eat halal meat because they eat halal meat.
I’m supposed to give up my dog because they don’t like dogs.
I’m supposed to let the take down the World Trade Center and not complain about it and just move on and allow them to worship their Allah?
I’m supposed to believe that the book they love to reference is a book of peace.
And if I question any of it I’m Islamophobic.
So, when you ask how I developed my feelings on the Moslems… I quite simply evaluated the facts.
The facts make it clear this is not something for me.
Despite knowing that, they tried to impose it on me anyway.
So now I cannot stand it. And that’s all.
- @JoeyMannarino
As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows:
To:
His Majesty, Charles III,
King of the United Kingdom and the Realms,
Supreme Governor of the Church of England,
Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith.
Your Majesty,
I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled.
Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment.
For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith.
The laws of this land were shaped by it.
The liberties of our people were nurtured by it.
The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it.
From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her.
Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them.
Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age.
Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel.
Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation.
What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state.
It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis.
The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge.
They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation.
Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?”
They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled.
Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law.
Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm.
History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ.
That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity.
And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault.
If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed.
The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long.
Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced.
For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender.
You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours.
Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means.
They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them.
For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it.
Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted.
May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown.
Yours faithfully,
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC
Missionary Bishop
Diocese of Providence
Confessing Anglican Church
@PhilHs10@RevBrettMurphy@revwickland@BishopRobert1@GBNews@TalkTV@danwootton@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@LozzaFox@BackBrexitBen@RupertLowe10@KemiBadenoch@JohnCleese
Dear Prime Minister & Home Secretary,
I hope this letter finds you well, fully caffeinated, and in possession of a calculator.
I’m writing with what I believe is a modest, fiscally responsible proposal. I understand the Government is offering up to £40,000 to certain individuals to voluntarily leave the United Kingdom. First of all — bold strategy. Nothing says “strong borders” quite like a cashback scheme.
Now, I regret to inform you that I am, in fact, a fully tax-paying, law-abiding British citizen. I know — awkward. I appreciate this may disqualify me from the premium exit package, but I’m willing to negotiate.
I would like to formally apply for £35,000 to leave.
You see, unlike some applicants, I haven’t broken any laws to get here. I didn’t arrive by dinghy. I didn’t require processing, housing, or legal appeals. I’ve actually been funding the whole operation through PAYE for years — which I believe makes me a loyal shareholder in this enterprise.
Given that you’re prepared to offer £40,000 for someone to depart voluntarily after entering illegally, I feel £35,000 for someone who’s been here legally all along represents excellent value for money. Think of it as a “Buy British, Get One Gone” discount.
For £35,000 I will:
• Leave quietly.
• Not require a press conference.
• Not demand a diversity officer to wave me off.
• Even carry my own suitcase to the airport.
I may also tweet a polite thank-you note on departure, praising the efficiency of the scheme.
Frankly, it feels like I’ve misunderstood how incentives work in modern Britain. All these years I thought obeying the law, paying taxes, and contributing to society were the winning strategy. Turns out the real pro-move is to arrive unlawfully and wait for a loyalty bonus.
Who knew?
While British families are juggling rent, energy bills, and the weekly food shop like contestants on a dystopian game show, it’s reassuring to know the Treasury has located a spare £40,000 per head for voluntary goodbyes.
May I ask — is there a points card? Ten years of National Insurance contributions and I get a free exit bonus? If so, I believe I’m overdue.
In the spirit of fairness and fiscal responsibility, I am not even asking for the full £40,000. I’m trimming £5,000 off to help balance the books. That’s the kind of responsible budgeting I was raised on.
If successful, I promise to:
• Leave via a scheduled flight (economy is fine).
• Not stage a protest on the runway.
• And refrain from re-entering on a small boat to see if I qualify twice.
All I ask is equal treatment. If departure is now a funded career pathway, I would very much like to submit my CV.
Yours in hopeful relocation,
A slightly confused taxpayer
This is a massive PR blunder, reflecting a lack of long-term thinking, with impulsive and reactive behavior driven by his self importance, self interest, jealousy and social media.
Prince Harry “The UK's supposed danger kept me from my friend's wedding and it’s not safe” yet I'm off to Ukraine, chasing relevance and seething with envy over my brother 🤦🏾♂️
He can take his security nonsense and shove it. This attention-seeking court case jester is costing us £500,000+, and for what? He doesn’t care about his safety or privacy.
So he can jet off to Ukraine, Nigeria, and Colombia but the UK is a problem. He doesn’t give a crap that we are struggling to pay our bills as long as The Duke of Sussex gets to feel important. He oozes with entitlement 🙄
It's time to end this absurd charade and stop indulging this privileged fool. He’s the biggest hypocrite and his words mean absolutely nothing.
He even made the Invictus Games foot the bill for his Ukraine trip, all for a PR stunt. This disaster tourist has no real reason to be there—visiting people for what, exactly?
After crying for five years and £30 million in the bank, I’d embrace the quietest life imaginable, steering clear of the public eye. I wouldn’t be feeding the media, I report to hate but actually leak my entire life to.
Harry, The Duke of moaning misinformation has millions in the bank and speaks for no one but himself and Archewell, not our head of state or country. He’s just a celebrity in California and is currently having a midlife crisis.
This is what happens when the leadership team at IG (a charity that was founded by the Royal Foundation) can’t say no, and he exploits the charity as a cog in the Sussex PR machine.
#PrinceHarry
If Keir Starmer had said before the election that he would remove the winter fuel allowance from millions of pensioners, enforce mandatory digital ID, record numbers of small boat crossings in the English Channel, hammer the disabled with welfare cuts, add inheritance tax to family farms and family businesses causing thousands of them to close, his deputy prime minister dodging £40,000 in tax, council tax & energy price increases, raise university tuition fees, plaster mass-scale solar panels on thousands of acres of prime farmland despite huge local community objections, hand over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius at a cost of £35bn, spaff £30bn of taxpayers’ money on carbon capture machines, give £3bn a year of taxpayers’ money to Ukraine, betray WASPI women, hang out with BlackRock, 50,000 small boat crossings in one year, create a new £50bn economic black hole, increase the overall tax burden to record levels, destroy business growth with national insurance rises resulting in over 200,000 job losses, get exposed for receiving over £100,000 worth of freebies - he almost certainly wouldn’t have won. He duped the electorate. An utterly shameless display of snake oil political salesmanship. And still he lectures all of us in that gratingly sanctimonious manner of his like we are all somehow the problem here.
🚨 Breaking!
The Irish government has informed the EU they will not comply with a demand to force hate speech laws on the public.
Hugely significant moment for free speech.
GROTESQUE ABUSE of taxpayers cash
Govt has just awarded £46 million contract to help Lebanese police force
While “not for profit” directors just taken out £3.6 million in one year of directors fees
Huge scandal: must be stopped
We @reformparty_uk can save billions
Wes Streeting has ordered an urgent review after 22 foreign drs working for the NHS were found to have been banned from medical practise in their home countries. How were these people cleared to practise in the UK?
The father of the Manchester synagogue terrorist is reportedly a top trauma surgeon ( last name Alshamie). I can’t find any research papers he’s been involved in though. Have we let a surgeon into our health service with no checks?
Warning...
Some taxpayers may find this offensive.
👇👇
This data was all taken from the https://t.co/NwgBu2h1UF Development Tracker (https://t.co/1pjDjX6zpf). All the figures refer to the amount of money budgeted to each scheme, not necessarily the amount already spent.
Almost all these aid programmes are currently ongoing so haven’t yet reached the total budgeted figure. Some were given the go ahead under Conservative Governments, and some under this Labour Government.
I have rounded the figures to make easier to read numbers.
£349.2 million on creating critical economic infrastructure such as bridges, renewable energy, ports and sea defences in the Caribbean.
£558.6 million on increasing provision of and access to impartial news and information (BBC World Service) in English and local languages across the developing world.
£127.6 million on building refugee resilience and inclusion in Turkey.
£212.8 million on support for health and £42.7 million on a partnership for Agile Governance and Climate Engagement in Nigeria.
£34.9 million on strengthening the ability of Pakistan’s health system to recover from COVID-19 and build future resilience.
£120.4 million on improving local Government ability to deliver local infrastructure services in Nepal.
£95 million on strengthening societal and economic resilience in Jordan, including expanding contributory social insurance schemes and supporting expansion of tax-financed social-assistance schemes.
£149.7 million on pioneering climate investment in India, £120 million on a Climate and Environment programme for Bangladesh and £108 million on a Climate Investment Fund for Pakistan.
£23.8 million on a Freedom and Resilience Programme in the Western Balkans to address structural issues including ethno-nationalist division, government transparency and accountability.
£26.7 million on improving the effectiveness, accountability and transparency of economic policies in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
£38.1 million on a climate smart jobs programme in Uganda.
£5 million on a Rights, Inclusion, Voice and Agency programme to empower women, girls and excluded groups in Nepal.
£99 million on transforming education and £20.6 million on accelerating economic transformation in Ethiopia.
£40.8 million on stabilising the deforestation frontier in Colombia.
£3.2 million on reducing inequality and exclusion experienced by LGBTI people in the Caribbean.
£9 million on supporting resilience, governance and economic reform in Moldova.
£4.8 million on a Roads Development Programme in Liberia.
£2.6 million on deepening democracy in Mozambique.
£320,922 on arts-based approaches to tackling gender based and racialised violence in Esmeraldas, Ecuador.
£184,611 on documenting femicide through research, film and participatory ceramic art in Vietnam.
£181,345 on developing art based public engagement and advocacy model for transforming social norms on gender-based violence in the Andean region.
£36,941 on supporting parliamentary reform, health for girls and environmental waste management in Mbabane, Eswatini.