NEET is not the issue
A I is
NEET leaks, cancelled exams, student suicides might leave bodies on the floor and parents screaming which might seem brutal in the way the system is being injured
AI does not wound the system.
It rips its throat out.
For centuries education had one job of forcing scarce knowledge down young throats like medicine and train them for predictable lives. But unlike in the past , Information is no longer scarce. It is a choking flood of lies, propaganda, and digital sewage. And AI stands in that flood with its mouth open, swallowing everything, chewing it, and spitting out clean answers faster than any human brain can even comprehend
Nobody knows what to teach a child to prepare for how the world will be in the next 10 or 20 years
Fixed knowledge is already decaying .
Technical skills are already twitching in their death throes.
The outdated belief
study hard once,
then live safely forever
has been dragged into the street by A I and shot dead .
What still has value in it is not marks.
Not degrees.
Not the ability to spew out facts
The only savage skill needed is to stay conscious while the world keeps rewriting itself, of reinventing yourself before the old version of you is buried by transformational technologies like A I
The classrooms, the sacred syllabi, the entrance exams we still treat like temples not realising that all of it is furniture inside a house that is already on fire. We are arguing about the arrangement of the chairs while the flames are climbing the walls. We need to wake up and smell the smoke
Except for EDUCATING how to use AI, every other form of education is now REDUNDANT.
The youth currently grinding through engineering, medicine, law, CA, MBA, architecture, design or any professional course are walking into a slaughterhouse. By the time they finish, most of those degrees will be mere paper. The jobs those courses were built for will already have been absorbed, compressed, or being erased by A I systems that never sleep, never demand salary, never take leave, and never make the same mistake twice.
A time has come when a single person can become a doctor + lawyer + engineer + chartered accountant + anything else all rolled into one. A same single human mind can diagnose, draft contracts, design systems, audit accounts, write code, and analyse everything more accurately than entire teams of traditionally trained professionals.
What does that leave the student who spent four, five, six years mastering only one of those domains the old way? It leaves them competing against someone who can do all of it .. better, cheaper, and at scale while they are still fighting for corrections in NEET
Every tech head in the world already proclaimed the death of all entry level jobs ..So what’s the point ?
Now the only education that can have any value is how to use A I
Every other form of education is obsolete and the ignorant Institutions , teachers and parents are dragging the youth into a A I slaughter house
If you are a student and your course is not aggressively teaching you how to use A I , you are being prepared for a non existent job
If you are a parent still measuring your child’s future by traditional ranks and degrees, you are killing their future
If you are a teacher still defending the old curriculum as sacred, you are participating in the death of their careers
The choice is no longer whether AI will change everything.
The only choice left is whether you become the one who wields it , or the one who is replaced by it.
I once again implore ..WAKE UP and SMELL THE SMOKE
When the Greek invader Seleucus was defeated by Emperor Chandragupta Maurya, he sent a proposal for the marriage of his very beautiful daughter, Helen, to Emperor Chandragupta.
Helen was Seleucus's youngest and most beautiful daughter. Upon receiving the marriage proposal, Acharya Chanakya arranged her marriage with Emperor Chandragupta..!!
However, before the marriage, he set some conditions for Helen and Chandragupta, which were the basis of their union.
The first condition was that no child of their union would be the heir to the throne.
The reason given was that Helen was a foreign woman with no connection to India's ancestors and was completely unfamiliar with Indian culture.
The second reason was that Helen was the daughter of foreign enemies. Her loyalty could never be with India.
The third reason was that Helen's son, being the son of a foreign mother, could never be free from her influence and would never be fully loyal to Indian soil and Indian people.
Another condition set by Acharya Chanakya was that Helen would never interfere in Chandragupta's governance and would stay completely away from politics and administrative authority.
However, she would have full rights within the household.
Think about it... In India and across the world, no other strategist and great politician like Acharya Chanakya has ever existed.
Waheeda Rehman and Guru Dutt loved each other. Everyone thought they would get married.
But Waheeda Rehman, who was a strict Konkani-Malabar Muslim, set a condition before Guru Dutt.
She said that she would not convert to Hinduism; if he truly loved her, he would have to accept Islam.
Guru Dutt refused to accept her condition, and one day, he took a bunch of sleeping pills and committed suicide.
Later, Waheeda married a Punjabi actor and businessman, Kamaljit. But she had Kamaljit convert to Islam in a mosque in Bangalore. Waheeda's two children, Sohel Rehman and Kashvi Rehman, are also Muslim.
The same thing happened with Dev Anand as well.
Saira Banu was Muslim.
Both Saira Banu and her grandmother pressured Dev Anand to convert to Islam.
When Dev Anand refused, Saira Banu's grandmother took the diamond ring that Dev Anand had given her and, from her finger, threw it into the sea.
I'm not saying that any of this was wrong.
I just want to ask secular people: if religion doesn't really matter, then why change?
And if all religions are the same, then why did anyone have to change their religion?
It is said that Aristotle always advised his disciple, Alexander the Great, to stay away from women’s company. Because of this, the women of the harem were very angry with him.
One day, they conspired together. They sent a very beautiful, mischievous, and charming slave girl to serve Aristotle. The girl, with her gestures and charms, ensnared Aristotle. One day, she set a condition: that Aristotle become a horse, and she would ride him.
At the very moment this famous incident was unfolding, all the women of the harem entered the room with Alexander. Seeing his teacher truly become a "horse" for a slave girl, Alexander was astonished and said:
"Oh, teacher! What kind of teaching is this? You advise us to stay away from women, and you yourself...?"
Aristotle, who was very clever, immediately stood up and, smiling, said:
My dear emperor! All this has been done for your own training. Just think, if a woman can make her teacher a horse, she will surely turn you into a donkey...!
Proposal to ban non-Hindus from entering Char Dham.
The Congress party claimed that if such a ban were instituted, it would also prevent the constitutional head of state.
The committee heads of the ‘Chota Char Dham’ shrines in Gangotri, Yamunotri, Kedarnath, and Badrinath in Uttarakhand have said that non-Hindus may soon be banned from entering the temple premises.
Articles 25 (right to freedom of religion) and 26 (freedom to manage religious affairs) of the Constitution protect their religious rights.
Article 25(2)(b) of the Constitution includes Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains under Hinduism.
In January 2024, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the Tamil Nadu state government to install boards at the entrances and prominent locations of temples (including the kodimaram or flagpole) to indicate that non-Hindus are not allowed beyond the kodimaram.
Non-Hindus are often treated temples like tourist spots, disrespecting the sanctity of the faith.
If there’s one thing I wish I had done differently when I was hit by a stroke last January, it would be to go to the hospital immediately, within the Golden Hour (<4.5 hours), instead of thinking I could just sleep it off.
This “nothing will happen to me” attitude is common, especially among those under 50. But the truth is, strokes are rising sharply, up to nearly 30% of all strokes in the last few years, among 30 to 50-year-olds.
When it comes to strokes, time is brain; every minute counts.
Thanks to @timesofindia for featuring this on World Stroke Day today.
The Law of Diminishing Returns to Scale:
As volume increases, price may initially rise sharply, but beyond a point, each additional burst of volume contributes less to price gains, showing diminishing returns.
#LawOfDiminishingReturns#EconomicsMeetsMarkets#BehavioralFinance
Being very aggressive has been my natural behaviour and it reflected in my approach towards markets too.
Like, I have always been on full size ignoring position sizing.
Competition breeds innovation through capitalism, just as competition amongst states breeds prosperity through federalism. “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (Federalist No. 51).
#Me to #myself:
No issues. Ye "Deep DD" ab bada Paisa kamane ke baad hua toh, nahi le paate hume. It's lucky that you are learning all these a bit early because it helps in building a strong foundation.
Luk at successful ppl and now unlearn and re-learn!!!
#Zero2One
#Me to #myself:
No issues. Ye "Deep DD" ab bada Paisa kamane ke baad hua toh, nahi le paate hume. It's lucky that you are learning all these a bit early because it helps in building a strong foundation.
Luk at successful ppl and now unlearn and re-learn!!!
#Zero2One
If you're in your early twenties, make your parents proud ,not just with success, but with your effort and choices.
Because once they’re gone, even your biggest wins will feel Empty.
May they live long enough to see you win.
Keep Grinding
#Life
Interesting experiment by @ElmWealth: 118 finance students were given tomorrow’s WSJ front page 24 hours before the news broke. You’d expect easy profits. Instead, half lost money and 16% went completely bust.
It wasn’t because their predictions were wrong. They called market direction correctly 51.5% of the time. That’s better than chance.
The problem? Position sizing.
Many students bet huge portions of their portfolio on a single trade. Some used 20x, even 60x leverage. When they were right, they made money. But when they were wrong they blew up. All it took was a single misstep.
Meanwhile, five experienced traders ran the same simulation. Same info. Very different outcome: +130% average returns. Why? They knew how much to risk. They bet small when uncertain, and big only when the odds were clearly in their favor. That’s the art of position sizing.
Here’s the core lesson: Even if you could predict the future, it wouldn’t save you from poor risk management. Trading isn’t just about being right. It’s about surviving long enough to stay in the game.
Most retail traders obsess over predictions. But smart money obsesses over how much to bet when they think they’re right—and how to protect themselves when they’re wrong.
Because in the markets, being right means nothing if you go bust before you're proven right.
What’s truly short-sighted is pushing a ₹18,500 Cr tunnel that:
▪️Serves only cars (4-wheelers), excluding 90%+ of Bengalureans
▪️Costs ₹1,100 Cr per km compared to Metro at ~₹500 Cr per km
▪️Lacks BMLTA approval, uses Maharashtra traffic data, & cites DPRs before feasibility reports were even completed.
This isn’t knee-jerk dismissal. It’s a call for scientific and accountable infrastructure.
Bengaluru needs smart mobility, not elite bypasses.
#TunnelRoadScam
1/5