Common sense educator, but tweets at random, and I might occasionally upset you.
Black woman. Lover of classics. Staying anonymous so I can speak the truth.
Curriculum selection for K-5 reading:
1. Does it have strong evidence of helping produce student excellence, closing achievement gaps, success for all subgroups?
2. Does planning required for full implementation match the teachers' contract?
You just eliminated 90% of options
And absolutely none of it is going to change if women keep partnering with these same men and having their kids. What's not clicking? lol The women opting out are actually doing the most powerful thing TO change this. Ya'll sit around and complain but sign up for it still.
"Vibes-based literacy" is SUCH a perfect phrase. It perfectly encapsulates how we've allowed reading instruction to be coordinated as casually and recklessly as finding the perfect "https://t.co/nviVkZ6NNy" mug in Ross.
All vibes, no research. I'm happy to see the tide turn!
This is a great thread, but seeing already "it's the need for $$$!" a lot. Schools can and need to do better on these 3 things and they don't need another dime to do them
1. HQIM - better curriculum
2. More direct and explicit instruction
3. Better behavior and classroom mgmt
My frustration is going to force me to go back to school at this point.
I'll need to get that EdD and find my own leadership position so that I don't have to be a pawn in someone else's scattered, purely ideological and harmful vision of effective schooling.
I'm working towards saying this bluntly IRL. For now, I'll tweet it:
We (my school and I suspect others) are clearly using SEL to avoid making unpopular, but VITAL decisions about schoolwide behavior management and improved instruction. Our leadership doesn't want the hassle.
I'm thoroughly irritated after almost every meeting that I have lately. I'm just losing patience with the laissez faire attitudes towards student learning that permeates our building culture. It's malpractice under the guise of progressivism.
I think it’s becoming a concern that if a teacher holds the line on the rules in their classroom and it leads to conflict, it will be questioned whether they are a ‘trauma informed practitioner’ and they will be asked to back down.
Young people have largely unfettered access to hours of degeneracy and toxicity via the net, have limited participation in real-life social institutions (churches, YMCA, etc.), and very few firm boundaries established by caring and strict adults.
Of course they're in crisis.
Teenagers in the U.S. are experiencing a mental health crisis.
Why has the issue become so widespread, and why have many people been caught off guard? Listen to today’s episode of The Daily.
https://t.co/SSyI8Kueo8
Plus, we already have pretty good access to gyms/therapists/yoga studios, etc. through insurance. That's covered, and I'm proud of our union for negotiating it.
So I really need my school to focus on professional expertise and stop searching for these SEL pet projects.
I could fix teacher mental health and wellbeing for a $0 vs. the initiatives currently being considered (a meditation app subscription?? lmao).
1) Equip teachers with strong curriculum and cognitive science-based instructional design.
2) Centralize behavior management.
It feels good to be competent at your job.
It feels good to have expertise.
It feels good to have predictable norms for behavior.
Why don't building leaders ever start THERE? We don't need some damn yoga sessions. I'll do that on my own time.
We need Rosenshine and Hirsch.