Inner City Legal Center was the legal representation for the side arguing “gender identity discrimination” during the Australian Human Rights Commission complaint against me for running a woman-only space that excluded men who claim to be women.
@WRNAustralia@salltweets A legalistic decision was on the cards. The Australian judiciary as for the Australian Human Rights Commission have been transed. Time to work through our Members of Parliament personally—appointments, email, letters—to convince them that most of their voters believe in reality.
It’s time … to speak up, stand up for the rights of lesbians and all women, to say that no man can become a woman, to say NO to men who do not respect women’s and girls’ rights.
#SexMatters
📍 VENUE ANNOUNCED
The Restore Women’s Rights – Fix the SDA Rally will be held at Sydney Town Hall.
🗓 Sunday 23 August
🕛 12:00 pm
📍 Sydney Town Hall
Join women and men from across Australia calling for the restoration of sex-based rights in Australian law.
#FixTheSDA
@hothingsgirlsay Thanks MJ. You are providing a very useful service in educating people about rhetorical techniques that gender identity ideologues and apologists use to avoid debate and hound, attack their oppponents.
@salltweets@Jilliantweeting C0ngratulations, Jillian. The best new I've heard for a while. Your poster at the conference was courageous, too. Let's hope more will stand up for you, instead of against you. Now we need to support the mental health nurses, who are under attack.
@sappholives83 /3 I’m drafting a Substack post right now exposing the big TQ lie in Australia that has made our legislative and justice system a mockery with the the ridiculous judgment handed down in the Giggle v Ticckle appeal. Please give me permission to quote, too.
M
@sappholives83 /2: They also have inserted themselves into government committees pretending they are representing sexuality minorities when in fact they are funnelling their money into maintaining the gender identity lie. No lesbian or gay who doesn’t support their big lie is included.
@sappholives83 In Australia, there is a network of multiple TQ organisations (many add the LGB at the beginning but they’re just tarnishing our reputation) receiving government grants.
Anna Cody and everyone else in the AHRC need to return to the original mission of supporting sex-based rights for women, a significant percentage of the population that the Sex Discrimination Commissioner is supposed to be protecting. Gender is not sex, transwomen are not women.
Great to see references to many Australian organisations and women rising up against the misogyny of gender ID ideology. Another Australian organisation working with them is the Coalition of Activist Lesbians (CoAL) https://t.co/n9aYBOcYd0.
I am forever grateful and proud to stand with each and every woman out there who knows that the female sex class cannot be bought, erased, or butchered by society as long as we continue to see past the smoke and mirrors, we will always win.
RISE UP, celebrate everything about yourself that is female.
Be a dictator of your own self, from head to toe, you are female, never compromise when it comes to the truth.
♀💜
They do it every single time.
The debate starts with a policy:
Sports.
Prisons.
Changing rooms.
Data collection.
Safeguarding.
Sex-based rights.
And then suddenly we’re no longer talking about the policy.
We’re told we’re debating someone’s existence.
No.
We’re debating a policy.
We’re debating rules.
We’re debating competing rights and competing interests.
Changing the subject from policy to existence is one of the most effective rhetorical tricks in this entire debate because it instantly turns disagreement into cruelty.
The moment someone says:
“Why are you debating my existence?”
Stop them.
Bring it right back.
“No. We’re debating a policy.”
Again.
And again.
And again.
Because if they can convince people that policy disagreement equals denying someone’s existence, they’ve already won the argument without having to defend the policy.
Who’s willing to start calling this out?
Not next year.
Not when it’s convenient.
Now.
Every time it happens.
“No. That’s not what we’re debating.”
Watch how often the conversation changes the moment you refuse to let them switch the subject.
You didn’t lose that argument. You lost the frame. And they knew exactly what they were doing. Breaking the Spell names all 30 manipulation tactics used in gender ideology debates with word-for-word counters for every single one. Link in bio.
@BasilTheGreat She elides from 'if a woman lives' to 'if a woman lives as a woman' witnout any reflection on the meaning of her word salad that is based on the lie that a man can be a woman.
@AusPsychReview To better understand women who turn on other women, see Andrea Dworkin's 'Right Wing Women', only include Left feminists who support gender ideology, too.