Cromwell's attested preference for listening to others rather than arguing with them and imposing his own view resembles Hitler's behavior with his generals.
Cromwell was more taciturn than Hitler but, in the first stage of the war at least, according to the post-war testimonies of Manstein, Guderian etc., H. was accommodating, allowed the generals to take the floor, didn't harangue and browbeat them.
There's just no conceivable way in which Catholicism can be anything other than a vector for gay race communism; the religion of the Teutonic Order cannot be resurrected.
"Cromwell was a member of the cadet branch of a declining family, an obscure Huntingdonshire farmer who by the age of 40 had achieved little of substance" is not untrue but what is obfuscated is that he was familially connected to some of the most powerful families in the kingdom
Completely zoned out, vacant smile, standing stiffly with arms down by the side, wow Hitler is Literally Me whenever I was out with my mum and she would start talking to someone
For Hobbes, might does not in fact confer the right to govern, as only at the willing of the people is sovereignty established. Strength is a necessary precondition for sovereignty, but not a sufficient one.
For Hobbes, 'sovereignty ariseth from Pact" and this answers any charges of hypocrisy on his part when he [belatedly] switched sides and gave his support to the Republicans. A new sovereign had been set up (through usurpation, which Hobbes did not feel the need to condone)../
and thus it was in the people's interests to acquiesce to to the new power, which was in a position to offer protection and keep the peace. No sovereignty is established without an illegal act of usurpation, but people are pragmatic.
For Hobbes, 'sovereignty ariseth from Pact" and this answers any charges of hypocrisy on his part when he [belatedly] switched sides and gave his support to the Republicans. A new sovereign had been set up (through usurpation, which Hobbes did not feel the need to condone)../