This is exactly why we built SimpleScanAI.
Google just made its search box AI-first for the first time in 25 years.
Conversational search, video, longer queries — the game has changed.
Your customers aren’t just Googling anymore.
They’re asking AI.
Make sure your business shows up.
Proud of the team for building the fastest way to get your SimpleScore™.
→ https://t.co/zusw4QBzhN
This is the shift every law firm owner needs to see.
It’s no longer enough to win on Google.
The real battle is winning when clients ask AI tools for lawyers in their area.
Most firms are completely invisible there.
We built @SimpleScanAI to fix that.
Run your scan → https://t.co/zusw4QC77l
"So @SimpleScanAI like an SEO tool?"
I get this question every week.
No.
And the difference is about to matter more than anything else in your marketing stack.
A thread by PROPS 🧵
This filter glitch is the perfect metaphor for what’s happening to most businesses right now.
AI agents are the new front door.
Without structured data, you’re completely invisible to them — even if your site looks great to humans.
The noise is loud. Most owners have no idea they’re missing out on the biggest traffic shift since Google.
@SimpleScanAI cuts through that noise: one scan shows you the problem + the fix.
Opportunity is here if you see it first.
What’s your SimpleScore?
Link in bio 👆
He really dropped a 31 with full confidence 😭
My brother thought he was flexing… she heard “entry level” and started planning her exit.
Watch till the end, the face she makes is lethal 😂
1/10: We scanned 357 VC-backed companies for AI visibility. 78% missing basic schema. 92% completely invisible to AI. Not one had the full stack. Here's what that means 🧵
Reality....only a small percentage of subjects take the time to learn. The percentage is smaller when you look at success rate. I'd be rich if I earned fees on how many times im asked or told "I want to learn to trade."
my inner thoughts ...."sure buddy"
The people that do want to learn, show up and show analysis....at least.
"i dont have time, i got kids" me too mfer. Literally typing this with an infant on my lap.
The new rule is supposed to fuck w your psychology
Wen it really has no effect to you
Why? bc you still need 5 winning days
So either way if your profitable you’ll get a payout and if not then you’ll blow it tryna get one
Fix your mind and payouts rain
If your still emotional I wouldn’t buy more accounts trying to bypass this new rule wen in reality the rule means nothing
I say this bc if your a trader who’s consistent this rule means nothing to you and won’t effect you at all
But the former is fucked either way
My honest opinion about topsteps new rules for XFA’s
Don’t really care bc in reality if your building a buffer anything outside of that is yours
So after every payout you’d be building more capital to keep that buffer and still request a payout
Maybe on day your done trading props so you withdraw all and close the account
For now you’re supposed to be trading to create a buffer and some to request a payout and keep a buffer.
And so on and so forth
This new rule only hurts those who don’t have good psychology
Here's what Topstep isn't telling you in their new update ⬇️
And soon, there will be many traders in for a big surprise when they go to request their second payout and are denied / ineligible.
Topstep's big announcement today very clearly specified that nothing was changing in regards to the firm's policies (literally saying "Same rules.").
Yet, they quietly added this incoming update "coming soon" onto their website.
Soon, you won't be able to take a second payout unless your balance is at or above your first payout request amount. So, if you make $8,000 and withdraw $4,000, you won't be eligible for future payouts if your balance is below $4,000.
Yes, if your balance is still THOUSANDS of dollars into profit (but below $4,000), you can't withdraw any of the money you rightfully earned. Every system has losses and swings in PnL, and this rule is designed to stop further payouts. This type of scummy move is what you'd expect from a shitty smaller firm (or Apex), not Topstep.
It's a terrible policy disguised as promoting account longevity, when in reality it's just meant to make it far more difficult for you to take payouts. It's a scummy move, which I guess shouldn't be surprising after Topstep got other firms to adopt their trading platform just to rug pull it once the major bugs were figured out (there are still issues).
You're entitled to your opinion on that move ^, but this new policy change is straight up 100% anti-trader. This rule has 0 benefit and only downsides to the trader. Sharing this is important because I doubt even 5% of people using or not using Topstep have noticed this upcoming change. I didn't notice it either - it was sent to me by a member on Prop Firm Center https://t.co/D8Bq8Yj2wY
Maybe they'll send out an email to all users once the new change is live. However, regardless of Topstep's ethics on sneaking this onto their site while clearly promoting "Same rules", this incoming policy is terrible. If this doesn't matter to you - sure.... but, if it does, just use one of the MANY firms where the money you make is YOURS once funded. I'm not using a firm where I'm not eligible to withdraw the money I earned just because my account balance is $1 below the amount of what I last requested (while still being THOUSANDS into profit!).
🚨 HUGE NERF TO TOPSTEP 🚨
TOPSTEP is only mentioning the good changes coming out and completely skipping over the fact that you must make whatever you took out in order to qualify for a second payout
God damn it what is with these firms and these sneak changes
Come on Mike!