@liorsela@bella_shortt@264CR The LEARNING happens during the training at Dojo. Running the largest commercial computer in existence (not academic research). You seem unable as a learning human to grasp this AFTER it has been pointed out to you, repeatedly. So much for learning humans.
@liorsela A recurring frustration with ill informed humans believing the inference model downloaded on the vehicle can “learn” or “remember” based on your specific history.
Not a thing. The TRAINING happens back at the mothership.
@wattreach@masegoslin Never had that issue in my Cybertruck. Because l, you know, it has good tech. Not just pretty curvy painted sheet metal. Function > Form.
@wholemars I’m one of them.
“Green” made 0% contribution to my decision to get the CT AWD 3 motor.
I wanted SUV like seating. Some cargo handling. PERFORMANCE. Self Driving.
Bonus points:
1) American.
2) Outrageously good value for the luxury level and performance specs.
Again. Toxin is in the dose.
You can’t call it poison or toxin.
If you’re not gonna call other things that are also toxins and poisons by the same label.
So it boils down to your belief that it has literally zero health benefits.
We’ll get to that in a moment, cause you’re wrong I. That too, BTW.
But even if NO health benefits, who the ACTUAL fuck are you to tell OTHER people what they can and can’t do whether it has any health benefits or not.
Are you saying people should not wear crystals for their aura? Or paint protective tattoos to ward off spirits? Really? Meddle much????
Specific benefits:
Cardiovascular Effects (Most Commonly Cited)
• Lower risk of heart attack, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular mortality: Dozens of older prospective studies and meta-analyses linked light-to-moderate drinking to a J-shaped curve, where moderate drinkers had 20-30% lower risk of coronary heart disease events, ischemic stroke, and CV death compared to lifetime abstainers.
• Mechanisms proposed (from interventional studies): Raises HDL (“good”) cholesterol, improves insulin sensitivity, reduces inflammation/fibrinogen, and enhances fibrinolysis.
• A 2024 National Academies report found moderate certainty for lower CV mortality and low certainty for lower nonfatal heart attack/stroke with moderate intake.
Recent reviews (e.g., Stanford, CDC, AHA) note these associations often don’t hold up when biases are better controlled, and any effect may not be causal.
Other Specific Associations
• Type 2 diabetes: Some meta-analyses showed ~30% lower risk with moderate intake (e.g., 0.5-4 drinks/day), possibly via improved insulin sensitivity or adiponectin.
• Gallstones: Moderate drinkers had lower risk in studies like Nurses’ Health Study.
• All-cause mortality: Moderate certainty in some reports for lower risk vs. never-drinkers (J-curve pattern), with light/moderate drinkers showing 13-23% lower risk in certain large cohorts.
• Other potential links: Lower kidney stone risk in some data; possible cognitive/dementia benefits or reduced frailty in older adults in limited studies; minor stress reduction or social/psychological effects (subjective well-being, sociability).
So you’re proven wrong. Go away now.
Again. Toxin is in the dose.
You can’t call it poison or toxin.
If you’re not gonna call other things that are also toxins and poisons by the same label.
So it boils down to your belief that it has literally zero health benefits.
We’ll get to that in a moment, cause you’re wrong I. That too, BTW.
But even if NO health benefits, who the ACTUAL fuck are you to tell OTHER people what they can and can’t do whether it has any health benefits or not.
Are you saying people should not wear crystals for their aura? Or paint protective tattoos to ward off spirits? Really? Meddle much????
Specific benefits:
Cardiovascular Effects (Most Commonly Cited)
• Lower risk of heart attack, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular mortality: Dozens of older prospective studies and meta-analyses linked light-to-moderate drinking to a J-shaped curve, where moderate drinkers had 20-30% lower risk of coronary heart disease events, ischemic stroke, and CV death compared to lifetime abstainers.
• Mechanisms proposed (from interventional studies): Raises HDL (“good”) cholesterol, improves insulin sensitivity, reduces inflammation/fibrinogen, and enhances fibrinolysis.
• A 2024 National Academies report found moderate certainty for lower CV mortality and low certainty for lower nonfatal heart attack/stroke with moderate intake.
Recent reviews (e.g., Stanford, CDC, AHA) note these associations often don’t hold up when biases are better controlled, and any effect may not be causal.
Other Specific Associations
• Type 2 diabetes: Some meta-analyses showed ~30% lower risk with moderate intake (e.g., 0.5-4 drinks/day), possibly via improved insulin sensitivity or adiponectin.
• Gallstones: Moderate drinkers had lower risk in studies like Nurses’ Health Study.
• All-cause mortality: Moderate certainty in some reports for lower risk vs. never-drinkers (J-curve pattern), with light/moderate drinkers showing 13-23% lower risk in certain large cohorts.
• Other potential links: Lower kidney stone risk in some data; possible cognitive/dementia benefits or reduced frailty in older adults in limited studies; minor stress reduction or social/psychological effects (subjective well-being, sociability).
So you’re proven wrong. Go away now.