@zhao_fan33 يعني مشروع مبني على دمار البقية من أجل إنتاج مهاجم واحد هل بإستطاعته نيل لقب كأس العالم ؟؟؟؟
برأيي مستحيل ، حتى ايغو يقول هي تجربة و التجربة غير مؤكدة في غالب الأحيان .
أتوقع ايساغي سوف يغير فلسفة بلولوك لوحده بمساعدة ساي و هوغو لايجاد فلسفة أخيرة تستطيع مجاراة العالم
@_monkey_D_larp@kuminokoru nagi has nothing to do with Ego's tactical errors , Nagi deserved to be locked off .
Ego's whole thing is sub in more strikers That's his strategy.
sure Ego is a genius when it comes to individual training, but collective training and actual game reading he is weak
@R001YE لكن خلال استراحة الشوطين ايغو كان معصب على كاراسو لأن لعبته تناقض فلسفة بلو لوك ؟؟؟؟ و قال بالحرف الواحد انه قاعد يقتل في بلولوك ؟؟؟
ايغو مريض نفسي بمعنى الكلمة و مو منطقي و كثير الأخطاء و مصيره الطرد من بلولوك
@BadGuyFromThere@aziel13gk you're right all you need to do to disprove a theory is provide one counter.
but for the sake of it what's Hugo's philosophy?
@aziel13gk@BadGuyFromThere did isagi score ??? no
did france win ??? yes
so did Hugo's destiny prevail???
yes.
did luck help isagi score and tie the game ???
no.
so isagi lost and hugo won .
i am not saying Hugo's philosophy ia absolute but so far whatever isagi came up with was not enough.
@aziel13gk@BadGuyFromThere did isagi score ?? if he scored than yes.
hugo never said blue lock can't score because they did and he was satisfied with the 2 goals because they were the product of his philosophy.
hugo claimed isagi( old blue lock) can't score or function which is what happened.
@Anatema_85 because the goals were the product of his philosophy(karasu being N2).
that's hugo philosophy, yet isagi never scored his goal and the cause was blue lock's philosophy the thing Hugo denied and claimed wrong.
so how did isagi's luck beat Hugo's destiny if he didn't score.
@Anatema_85 hugo philosophy is about results, as i said if isagi scored than Hugo's philosophy was wrong but it wasn't the case.
hugo never claimed isagi can't get past me, he never claimed blue lock can't score goals because they scored 2 goals and he was okay with them,he was satisfied.
@Anatema_85 on the other hand isagi wanted to prove that he can score while being an egoist, which didn't happen.
from the beginning hugo kept talking that blue lock is destined to lose , which happened again.
so how did he lose exactly???
@Anatema_85 follow me on this one.
how does isagi dribbling hugo proves that his ideology is wrong, when isagi couldn't score.
if he scored that would've been the case.
Hugo never said that isagi can't get past him, he said that blue lock is dead if isagi keeps playing the same.which is true
@Anatema_85 to win ideologically would mean to actually have results, isagi didn't prove hugo wrong .
all hugo said was that 1)blue lock was going to lose if isagi kept playing the way he does.
2) isagi isn't meant to be N1.
and he is right.