@Deopiniemaker@JensFranssen Wordt het zo langzaam geen tijd dat je uit de kast komt en dat Belgisch vlagje in een Russisch verandert, vriend?
https://t.co/ctEyjXlX7y
Just thought I would cut the debate on this claim by Russia that Ukraine struck a bus killing 7 or 8 and wounding 11 people. Firstly its Russia presenting "facts" and secondly its two different buses.
Just thought I would cut the debate on this claim by Russia that Ukraine struck a bus killing 7 or 8 and wounding 11 people. Firstly its Russia presenting "facts" and secondly its two different buses.
@Deopiniemaker Massale bombardementen op 🇺🇦 steden met 22 doden : *krekels*
Beelden van een brandende bus in Donbas en onbevestigd verhaal : "MOORD! BRAND!"
Hoeveel roebels schuift dit?
On the very same day that Putin's St. Petersburg 'I'm a great leader' show is disturbed (and will never be the same again), an "Ukranian drone" slams into a bus packed with people in the Donbas
Coincidence? #falseflag
Ukraine just proved it can strike into Russia during prestige event—Putin’s St. Petersburg Economic Forum—hitting a major oil terminal and the Kronstadt naval base. It’s a strategy targeting Russia’s war economy and military infrastructure, but not just in the form of money
Putin tries to style the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum as a peer and a non-Western alternative to the World Economic Forum in Davos. This is part of a global strategy of pushing a multipolar world order. It is intended to provide opportunities for Russia to attract foreign direct investment, engage in global investment, and garner international political support.
These strikes generate several narratives and highlight multiple gaps. The discussions tend to center around increasing Russian revenue and exports, but as I have repeatedly stated, wars are about resources not money.
Putin needs to convince global players that Russia is a reliable partner and will win the war in Ukraine. He needs political support to help counter sanctions. His war machine to import the materials and machinery to provide for the Russian army and air force. Hitting a major port city on the eve of his big economic forum counters this narrative.
Further countering this narrative is the fact that the strike happened both in the city and at a nearby naval base crippling a frigate. This highlights that with all of Russia's military capacity and technology, Putin is unable to defend his most cherished events. For this strike to successfully happen, multiple early warning radars, electronic warfare systems, and air defenses were either bypassed or not functioning. Multiple hits demonstrates there as systemic issues with air defense even in critical regions that should be receiving the best.
The net result is the message that Russia is unreliable and that Ukraine has the technical capability and capacity to strike any investments made into Russia and that Russia can't help you.
@RomboutLuc Putin, die die jaarlijkse economic summit gebruikt om te showcasen dat hij een krachtige leider is, kan niet meer wegsteken dat oorlog is coming home.
@PetrBystronAfD 0 Residential area's hit, 0 dead.
Smart : Massive coverage for Putin's show that he is a strong leader but Russia can see now that the war is not going as he is claiming and he cannot stop the war "coming home".
30 jaar roofbouw op budget defensie : *krekels*
Nu broodnodige inhaalbeweging defensie : "U WORDT BEROOFD!"
2026, ondertussen : 4e jaar grootste conflict op Europees continent sinds WOII.
Beschermheer 🇺🇸 : "Europe, you're on your own" (zeggen ze infeite al sedert 2011)
Media en experts hebben blijkbaar duidelijke instructies gekregen: de extra miljarden voor defensie worden niét in vraag gesteld.
Nochtans, in hetzelfde rapport: "Deze groei [in uitgaven] is in zeer grote mate toe te schrijven aan de stijging van de defensie-uitgaven."
U wordt beroofd waar u bij staat, en men doet er alles aan om het weg te moffelen.
@wbeke PS. Misschien is het niet wat u bedoelt maar voor een Belg die defensie en de politiek errond wat volgt, klinkt "integreren van strijdkrachten op Europees niveau" uit de mond van een Belgisch politicus teveel als "besparen op defensie".
@wbeke niet op konden tegen het geweld van de reuzen als Boeing. Zo werd Airbus geboren en de rest is geschiedenis.
Ik denk dat de defensie-industrie eerder een Airbusifiëring nodig heeft dan integratie van nationale strijdkrachten, die al grotendeels bestaat.
2/2