WHDA IP Law

WHDA is a full service intellectual property law firm.

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

For lessons on #Claim & #Specification #Drafting, #Litigation #Strategies and more, visit WHDAs' CAFC blog including some of the most recent precedential cases #patents #design #trademarks https://t.co/3SrFnJRi41

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

If It Isn’t The Same, It’s Different!-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

when an apparatus claim depends on functioning claim to describe the apparatus, what the device does and how it does it are highly relevant to understanding what the device is-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Functional Limitation, Claim Construction, and Obviousness: Bayer v. Mylan-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

The Federal Circuit’s First AIA Derivation Case-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Presumption of Validity Does Not Protect a Patent from Invalidity for Lack of Adequate Written Description-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

SHOCKING - APPLICANT ADMITTED PRIOR ART SINKS OWN PATENT-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

No Going Back!-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Less Heightened Standard for the Nexus Requirement regarding the Licenses Offered as Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

: Federal Circuit’s Question of First Impression on the Patent Eligibility of Machine Learning-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Indefiniteness and Means-Plus-Function: Fintiv v. PayPal-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

CAFC Affirms Prosecution Disclaimer and Non-Infringement in ANDA Case-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Written Description is Required When a Preamble is Limiting-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

In Re: Entresto -Written Description and Enablement Do Not Have To Be Complicated-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Claim Construction and Doctrine of Equivalents: NexStep v. Comcast-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Standing Reminder for Inter Partes Review Decisions-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Liberal construction for pro se litigants does not mean ignoring the pleading requirements under the FRCP-https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Both at Once: CAFC Clarifies that a Claim’s meaning Stands by Itself-https://t.co/FhgXid7BRM

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

A Camera Patent that is NOT Directed To an Abstract Idea – Finally!-https://t.co/SXsi33QiIb

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

Voice Tech Corp., v. Unified Patents, LLC 2022-2163 (Fed Cir. August 1, 2024), (Presidential)- https://t.co/FhgXid742e

[WHDA IP Law @WHDA_IPLaw]

When to Apply Printed Matter Doctrine to Communications and Program Code https://t.co/y4JpTlx6Ur