𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞 

👶🏼ℙ𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕤 👨🏻‍🎓𝕃𝕠𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕟 👨🏻‍💼𝕄𝕚𝕝𝕒𝕟 🇪🇺🇫🇷🇬🇧🇮🇹🏳️‍🌈

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@Oitajpn @laplacian28 You’re welcome ! I’ll be surely blocked 🚫 in 3, 2, 1…

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@laplacian28 @Oitajpn As you courageously ended the conversation blocking him, I generously share his response

[Oita @Oitajpn]

What a huge retard @laplacian28

No, they’re not perfect synonyms. “Depends on” implies a much stronger degree of dependency than “relies on”. That’s exactly why people choose one over the other in strategic discussions.

And when your argument is so weak that your first response is an insult, it usually means you don’t have much of a case to make. Only people who can’t defend their point resort to name-calling instead of addressing the actual argument.

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@Nos2478 @sandrogozi @GiorgiaMeloni @MoDem @democrats_eu @ItaliaViva @RenewEurope @RenewEuropeFRA Domanda ok, ma “ego francese” è slogan. La decisione sull’uso dell’arma francese resta solo a Parigi e anche nel nuclear sharing NATO le B61 restano sotto controllo USA. Discutiamo di costi/benefici e garanzie, non di stereotipi.

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@Marcusmanch @sandrogozi @GiorgiaMeloni @MoDem @democrats_eu @ItaliaViva @RenewEurope @RenewEuropeFRA È già così con le bombe nucleari americane sul suolo italiano ! l’Italia non ha alcuna voce né controllo sul loro utilizzo.

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@vlad3ciobanu @bundeskanzler @EmmanuelMacron @grok could you explain the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and when Germany signed it to Vlad ?

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@humanbird19 @bundeskanzler @gallaghereport @EmmanuelMacron He didn’t say he was sharing nuclear deterrence… 🙄

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@2lapagerie @bundeskanzler @EmmanuelMacron Good. He didn’t say he was sharing nuclear deterrence… He didn’t violate national sovereignty… and he’s not running for another term… your analysis lack intelligence

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@BrunoTertrais 😥😢

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@CBSNews “controversial” reflects media framing more than sporting reality. A Netflix doc amplified the narrative, but facts are simple: Cizeron came out of retirement, Fournier was forced to find a new partner after a ruling, and they built a world-class partnership in just one year.

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@seragaldinbadr @ConnorAllenEU https://t.co/UZzOO8ruI4

[Bravo Zulu Hôtel @realismebarbu]

@ConnorAllenEU • MBDA (🇫🇷/🇬🇧/🇮🇹)
• SAMP/T (🇫🇷/🇮🇹)
• A400M (🇫🇷/🇩🇪/🇪🇸/🇬🇧/🇹🇷/🇧🇪/🇱🇺)
• PAAMS / ASTER (🇫🇷/🇬🇧/🇮🇹)
• FCAS / SCAF (🇫🇷/🇩🇪/🇪🇸)
• TIGER (🇫🇷/🇩🇪/🇪🇸)
• NH90 (🇫🇷/🇩🇪/🇮🇹/🇳🇱)
• FREMM (🇫🇷/🇮🇹)
• MUSIS (🇫🇷/🇩🇪/🇮🇹/🇪🇸/🇧🇪)
France is able to cooperate with 🇪🇺, 🇩🇪 fucked-up.

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@Edel_Lyne @____jade16 @Orange_France Oui. Ca n’a pas fonctionné. En revanche en basculant sur la 4G au lieu de la 5G auto ça a marché pendant 2h

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@2xnmore @BBCWorld Yes, he’s hiding a blood vessel injury on his right eye 👁️🤷🏻‍♂️

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@USAmbEU @realDonaldTrump

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@nicksortor @elonmusk That’s funny considering Elon Musk agreed with the DSA in 2022 😄👍🏼

https://t.co/iz9aisEa3s

[Pablo Pérez @PabloPerezA]

Elon Musk on the Digital Services Act (2022): "I think it's exactly aligned with my thinking. I very much agree with (...) I really think, I agree with everything you (@ThierryBreton) said, really. We are very much of the same mind"

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@BFadile @IanBrossat Celle ci sur Stockholm bien que concentré sur le métro
https://t.co/JApa6GYGyQ

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@BFadile @IanBrossat https://t.co/ukRU6LG7kb

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@BFadile @IanBrossat https://t.co/FXLsD6tuuU

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@BFadile @IanBrossat il y a des études solides qui montrent que les 🎥 sont efficaces, par ex à Stockholm ou au UK. Mais elles insistent sur un dispositif global et adapté. Ce n’est pas la seule surface ou le simple nombre brut de caméras, mais la capacité à couvrir les personnes en zone dense.

[𝕎𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕞  @WILLEMVANDUVEL]

@BFadile @IanBrossat Cette étude n’a rien à voir avec la densité au km2 ni avec une justification du raisonnement “surface > population”. Ca parle de la compensation du coût des cctv par la diminution des crimes à Poznan dans 7 des 8 quartiers de Poznan étudiés ici l’efficacité n’est pas démontrée.