Pingling

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@0xCokinha @Capyfi_BR a taxa de empretimo sempre igual apy ? qual vantagem nisso ?

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@hicasamadim 9

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@0xSopranoFi @solsticefi Bruno vai segurar ate que dia o YT ? deixar zerar ?

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@debinvest @Capyfi_BR @CapyFi_Protocol olha a taxa agora quase 16% pra pegar emprestado

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@Bolao2026 @solana @tensor_hq @MagicEden

[𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐄𝐓𝐀 🇧🇷 🇮🇹 @Coleta_Cripto]

Projeto sendo desenvolvido inclusive por devs da OnRE

É Hoje!

[LAB @LABtrade_]

The easiest way to understand the vision is to use the product

Still early

[LAB @LABtrade_]

Every trade, every product, and every piece of activity across the LAB ecosystem contributes to something bigger

The LAB Buyback Program does exactly that:

> Converts ecosystem revenue into market demand for $LAB
> Reinforces a sustainable growth loop as adoption increases
> Aligns users, builders, and holders around a shared outcome
> Creates long-term support for the ecosystem as it expands

The Buyback Program ensures that ecosystem growth can translate into long-term ecosystem strength

Check it out here: https://t.co/lTQDAucZCh

[KAST @KASTxyz]

Regulation is moving fast.

And 3 key players are working to set the rules:

1. Banks
2. Regulators
3. Crypto firms

Which one will get their way? 🤔

[MUTUAL @mutual_sol]

@solana

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@MaticoYTB qual; seu codigo de indicacao ?

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

Depende do criterio. Por NC e distribuicao de stake entre validadores, a Solana e mais descentralizada. Por diversidade de clientes, barreiras de entrada, custo de operacao, distribuicao geografica e resiliencia de infraestrutura, a Ethereum e mais descentralizada. Se voce valoriza resistencia a um ataque de conluio de stake (33%), a Solana ganha. Se voce valoriza resistencia a falhas de software, captura regulatoria localizada e capacidade de participacao individual, a Ethereum ganha.

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@Bolao2026 Bolao2026

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@Clarinha_degen @DreyerDev queria testar o software alguns dias gratuitos tambem

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

Who said referring friends doesn’t pay off fast?
While most traditional finance apps only give you a headache with hidden fees, I decided to test KAST's referral rewards, and the results are right there on the screen.

#KASTreferrals

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

People keep saying crypto needs better onboarding. KAST is doing the obvious move: reward new users for actually spending.
Not just signups. Not empty farming. Real usage. Real incentives.
That’s how growth loops compound. 👀
@Coleta_Cripto @raagulanpathy @KASTxyz

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

The Honest Assessment
At $6M MC (and lower FDV when accounting for team issuance), the realistic outcomes are:
PathLikelihoodNotesStrategic acqui-hireModerateTeam gets absorbed, token goes to zeroTreasury distribution + wind-downPossibleIf governance votes it, cleanest exit for holdersOrganic recovery + product PMFLow but non-zeroRequires runwayToken merger at fair ratioVery hardCounterparty would lowball given MC
The position you're in as an early supporter holding through this is unfortunately the classic long-tail crypto holder situation — the team has more leverage in any outcome than the community does, structurally.
Patient waiting is probably the right call. Any forced M&A at this MC would almost certainly be value-destructive to token holders.

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

Practical M&A Mechanics for a Token Project at This Stage
If someone were to pursue it, here are the real levers:
1. Treasury Acquisition (simplest)A larger protocol or DAO passes a governance vote to acquire $AVICI's treasury + codebase in exchange for their own token. Pure on-chain swap. Works if treasury > MC (rare but possible).
2. "Acqui-hire" structureThe acquiring team has no interest in the token — they just want the dev team and IP. They negotiate off-chain with the foundation/LLC. Token holders get nothing unless the legal entity has explicit obligations to them (unlikely).
3. Token merger / swapProtocol A offers a fixed conversion ratio of Token B for Token A. Requires governance approval on both sides. The challenge at low MC: the ratio will feel punitive to $AVICI holders.
4. Governance-controlled asset saleIf $AVICI governance controls meaningful on-chain assets (revenue streams, staked positions, owned protocol fees), those can be sold via governance vote and proceeds returned to token holders — essentially a wind-down with distribution, not a merger.
5. MetaDAO-style conditional proposalPropose the merger on MetaDAO's infrastructure, let the market decide. Theoretically cleanest, practically requires more liquidity than $6M MC supports.

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@wormhole I staked my W coins a few months ago on the official website https://t.co/wOWbIcV8jy in the Solana network. Everything was displaying correctly before, but now my staked coins are no longer visible in the dashboard. What could be the reason?

[Pingling @WagnerM97946292]

@fabiocatalao_ John Davison Rockefeller