@Wake_Up_For_CNG
I' a passionate patriot who voted for strong border security and fiscal responsibility, urging America to prioritize its own over foreign $$
The landmark SCOTUS ruling in Carpenter v. United States (2018) provides a powerful constitutional foundation for the argument that warrantless mass surveillance via Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) networks violates the Fourth Amendment.
While the government has historically relied on the traditional public-roads doctrine to argue that drivers have no expectation of privacy on public streets, Carpenter fundamentally upended this logic by establishing that "individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the whole of their physical movements". A single, isolated snapshot of a vehicle's license plate by a standard street camera is constitutionally unproblematic. However, when thousands of interconnected Flock cameras aggregate location, direction, timestamps, and unique vehicle features into a centralized, searchable database, they create a comprehensive, retroactive, and unconstitutional "mosaic" of an individual’s daily life.
Just as Chief Justice John Roberts noted that cellphones act as "faithfully following" trackers that grant the state an encyclopedic record of private life, Flock’s ubiquitous grid builds an equally intrusive, retrospective timeline of a citizen's patterns, routines, and associations. Privacy advocates, including legal teams from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argue in cases like Schmidt v. City of Norfolk that Flock's architecture allows law enforcement to effortlessly bypass traditional constitutional safeguards.
They do this by logging the movements of millions of completely innocent citizens first, without individualized suspicion, and allowing police to run warrantless, historical searches later.
Furthermore, Carpenter explicitly limited the third-party doctrine, meaning the government cannot argue that drivers surrender their privacy rights simply because their location data is automatically collected and managed by a private corporation like Flock Safety acting as a surveillance proxy. Because the Supreme Court’s recent Chatrie decision further restricted broad, automated location-harvesting warrants, Carpenter's core logic dictates that accessing an automated network capable of reconstructing a person's physical history over weeks or months constitutes a Fourth Amendment search that strictly requires a warrant backed by probable cause.
MAN VS. MACHINE: The Battle for the Soul of Humanity with MKUltra Whistleblower James Martinez | Going Rogue with Lara Logan | Ep 88
James Martinez is a behavioral scientist and MKUltra whistleblower. He explains his lawsuit against Palantir Technologies, the data company who is violating cognitive and bodily autonomy through invasive surveillance, mass manipulation, and worse. James also addresses transhumanism, brain-computer interfaces, and how social media fosters mass dissociation. He says it's time for us to assert our rights, reject invasive technology, and protect our humanity against this orchestrated system of tyranny.
00:00:00 Cell Phones as Training Wheels for Synthetic Telepathy
00:01:13 MKUltra's Real Legacy: The Battle for Your Mind
00:07:48 Cognitive Liberty and the Freedom of Thought Foundation
00:13:31 Pagers to Smartphones: How Technology Rewired Your Nervous System
00:17:49 The Kill Shot, Nanotechnology, and Cybernetic Consent
00:24:41 Palantir Exposed: The Most Dangerous Surveillance Company on Earth
00:37:03 Brain Computer Interface: The Final Frontier of Transhumanism
00:52:44 Dissociation, MKUltra, and the Manufacturing of Manchurian Candidates
01:01:09 Wearables, Children, and the Suicide of Humanity
01:11:16 Satanic Ritual Abuse, Trauma Programming, and Fractured Identity
01:23:29 Cognitive Liberty Under Law: Rebutting Contracts and Neurocognitive Rights
01:57:43 The Spiritual War Behind the Technology: Choosing God Over the Beast
MKUltra, cognitive liberty, mind control, Palantir, transhumanism, brain computer interface
@Electric11Media | @GoingRoguewLara
Officials in Auburn, California they’ve just announced that a group of people have removed most of the city’s Flock surveillance cameras and dumped them in a nearby canal.
“There’s a big uproar regarding government camera surveillance.”
WHY IS EVERYTHING IN THIS COUNTRY PUSHED BY POLITICIANS ABOUT THE COLOR OF A PERSON'S SKIN.....It's even bled into our sports.
MORE REASONS TO LOVE SOPHIE CUNNINGHAM because she sees it all and is fighting back.
Sophie is a 'TRUTH TELLER' - "Let's just call it what it is - RACISM - It started with Caitlin Clark and now me.
Ya'll see it - when White people start hooping at a high level - suddenly we are cocky and deserve to be hit or we are too emotional.
BUT - Let's be real - They just don't like seeing White girls dominating their game."
"If I get hit dirty, I'm swinging back".
🚨 UPDATE: The U.S. House is expected in the coming days to vote on ABOLISHING the seasonal time changes under the Sunshine Protection Act, supported by President Trump
Get it done! This would mean NO MORE changing the clock ☀️
TRUMP following the recent committee passage: "We are going with the far more popular alternative, Saving Daylight, which gives you a longer, brighter Day — And who can be against that — This is an easy one!"
"This is so important in that Hundreds of Millions of Dollars are spent every year by people, Cities, and States, being forced to change their Clocks. Many of these Clocks are located in Towers, and the cost of renting, or using, Heavy Equipment to do this twice a year is prohibitive!"
"I am going to work very hard to see The Sunshine Protection Act signed into Law. It’s time that people can stop worrying about the “Clock,” not to mention all of the work and money that is spent on this ridiculous, twice yearly production."
Formed in 1989, Dread Zeppelin was an American rock band that famously performed Led Zeppelin songs reimagined in a reggae style, fronted by a Las Vegas-era Elvis Presley impersonator named Tortelvis.
🚨 PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO REALIZE WHY JOHN MCAFEE WAS KILLED — AND IT'S NOT FOR THE REASON YOU THINK
Years after his death, John McAfee's name is still generating debate online.
Not because of his software.
Not because of cryptocurrency.
Because of the things he said before he died.
McAfee spent years criticizing governments, institutions, and powerful interests.
He spoke frequently about secrecy, surveillance, freedom, and the growing power of unelected systems.
He was also one of the most outspoken public figures questioning the official narrative surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. He repeatedly referenced Epstein and publicly stated that if he ever died, people should not assume it was suicide.
Then, after McAfee's death in a Spanish prison in 2021, old interviews and clips began circulating all over again.
So did the controversy surrounding a viral Surfside condo tweet that spread across social media and became part of the broader McAfee rabbit hole.
Every few months, another interview resurfaces.
Another clip goes viral.
Another generation discovers the John McAfee story.
And the arguments start all over again.
What do you think really happened to John McAfee?
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump just OBLITERATED NATO, basically calling them freeloaders who barely deserve his presence if it weren't for Turkey
"ITALY turned us down. GERMANY turned us down. FRANCE turned us down."
"We WEREN'T TREATED WELL."
"I was VERY disappointed with NATO. Frankly? If it weren't held in Turkey...it's possible I would NOT have attended [NATO]. I felt I had to because [Erdogan] has gone all out."
"In a way, I was testing people!"
"Why are we spending hundreds of billions of dollars, they weren't there for us, we've been there for them."
"We protect European countries...you'd THINK they'd be very willing to do something to help us. And they REALLY WEREN'T."