🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

We may not agree, but I’ll stand up for your right to say what you want

Pro truth, anti Bullshit

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

Right, I’m going to need some help with this from everyone please. I’m not a Lawyer so I’m reaching out, I’m looking for some advice. Seeing as they’re not above the law, would it be possible to start Criminal proceeding’s?
Tag anyone you feel is necessary. Thank you in advance.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@DaleVince My 7 year old daughter asked me why you dress like her

What should I say to her?

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

You, Keir Starmer, stand revealed as the architect of Englands slow crucifixion. What began as the modest Oxted boy who clawed his way from toolmaker son to DPP, knight and leader has morphed into something far darker, a calculated transformation that explains why this once great nation now staggers under betrayals too many to list, each one multiplied by ten. You have quietly built your own personal army of the radical left: Antifa at the front, backed by Black Lives Matter, Extinction Rebellion, Just Stop Oil, Palestine Action and Stand Up to Racism. These shock troops operate with near total immunity while you look the other way. The police, the NHS, every institution meant to shield the British people, all have now been seized at the highest level. Lefty cunts run the show.

This is no longer British politics. This is a Marvel film scripted by the devil himself. The mainstream media lies completely captured and compromised, pushing your narrative with fanatical loyalty. History has shown us time and again that every strong left wing uprising gives perfect cover for Islamic terrorists to surge forward and strike. Two of the most dangerous hidden forces on earth, radical socialism and militant Islam, are now working hand in glove, in the shadows, to deliver the final blow. England, as we knew her, is nearly dead.

From the moment you seized office as Prime Minister on 5 July 2024 you have executed a systematic betrayal of the British people. On world television you declared that Muslims are the face of the new England. You transferred billions in taxpayers money to your globalist masters in the WEF and the EU. Record numbers of small boats have continued to cross the Channel while grooming gang victims remain abandoned and every failure from your DPP years has been erased from the record. You have placed the police, the NHS, the courts and every institution charged with protecting this nation under the control of radical left wing forces. You are constructing the most expansive surveillance and censorship apparatus Britain has ever known. You have discarded the working class communities that elected you. You are not a leader. You are a traitor who has methodically dismantled England from the inside with clinical precision.

You have transferred tens of billions of English taxpayers money to your globalist masters in the WEF and the EU and achieved precisely nothing in return. You pledged 3 billion annually to Ukraine and secured zero strategic gain. You allocated 2.1 billion this year alone to asylum hotels and migrant contracts while small boat crossings reached record levels and zero deterrence was delivered. You disbursed 9.2 billion in foreign aid and obtained nothing. You committed 8.3 billion to Great British Energy and net zero schemes and delivered nothing except higher energy bills for British households. You locked in 21.7 billion for carbon capture projects and received nothing but empty assurances from the same elites who now control pieces of Britains future. Every pound extracted from British workers, pensioners and farmers disappeared without trace. You achieved nothing. You delivered nothing. You are a traitor who has systematically looted England for foreign interests.

The English people, exhausted by the endless noise and lies, deserve direct answers to these ten questions that cut to the heart of your betrayal: Why did you stand before the cameras of the world and declare that Muslims are the face of the new England? Why have you funneled billions of British taxpayers money to your masters in the WEF and the EU while achieving nothing in return? Why have record numbers of small boats continued to cross the Channel on your watch with zero deterrence? Why have grooming gang victims been abandoned and every failure from your DPP years erased from history? Why have you placed the police, the NHS and the courts under the control of radical left wing forces? Why are you building the largest surveillance and censorship machine Britain has ever known? Why have you imposed inheritance tax on family farms to force their sale to foreign buyers? Why have you reversed every manifesto promise that won you power? Why have you discarded the Red Wall working class voters who trusted you? And why, above all, have you methodically dismantled the England we knew and replaced it with something unrecognisable?

There are no words left in any language to describe the depth of the hatred you have earned. We have exhausted every civilised method of conveying that your lifes work, this vile fusion of radical left wing extremism and Islamic infiltration, is not wanted on these shores. Your entire government is loathed and rejected by the British people. We are rapidly running out of ways to ask. Now what?

Britain First. No Surrender. 🦁🇬🇧

[The Constitution @TheConstit71705]

Document Title:

The Web of Constitutional Breach: Lawful Grounds for Dissolution of Parliament and Restoration of Sovereignty by the People of the Realm

Purpose:

To present an unassailable legal case documenting constitutional breaches by the UK Government and Crown since 1997, each breach constituting a violation of foundational statutes, common law, or constitutional conventions. These breaches collectively justify the lawful dissolution of Parliament and the reassertion of sovereignty by the People, with precise remedies grounded in law and precedent.

CENTRAL BREACH (THE SPIDER):

The UK Government, in collusion with the Crown, has systematically violated its fiduciary duty to the People, acting as a corporate entity contrary to the constitutional framework established by Magna Carta 1215, the Bill of Rights 1689, and common law principles.

Strand 1: Breach of the Coronation Oath Act 1688

Breach: King Charles III’s public statements declaring himself “Defender of Faiths” contravene the Coronation Oath Act 1688, which mandates the monarch to “maintain the Laws of God, the true Profession of the Gospel, and the Protestant Reformed Religion established by Law.” This undermines the statutory requirement of Protestant supremacy.
Evidence: BBC interviews, 2015 speech to faith leaders.
Remedy: Monarch to publicly reaffirm the oath; Joint Committee investigation with power to suspend royal assent.
Counterargument Rebuttal: The oath is a legal obligation, not symbolic.

Strand 2: Breach of the Act of Settlement 1701

Breach: Monarch’s public endorsements of non-Protestant faiths violate the Act’s guarantee of Protestant succession.
Evidence: Official transcripts and video evidence.
Remedy: Constitutional commission to assess compliance; succession proceedings if breached.
Counterargument Rebuttal: Public role is constitutionally binding, not personal opinion.

Strand 3: Breach of the Bill of Rights 1689 (Article 1)

Breach: HRA 1998 allows courts to suspend statutes via declarations of incompatibility, violating Article 1.
Evidence: R (Nicklinson) v. Ministry of Justice [2014].
Remedy: Amend HRA to remove such powers.
Counterargument Rebuttal: Article 1 prohibits any suspension, direct or indirect.

Strand 4: Breach of the Bill of Rights 1689 (Article 4)

Breach: Party whips and media bias undermine “free” elections.
Evidence: Hansard records; Ofcom bias reports.
Remedy: Abolish party whips; guarantee equal media access for independents.

Strand 5: Breach of Magna Carta 1215 (Clause 39)

Breach: Arrests for peaceful protest deny right to jury trial.
Evidence: Public Order Act 2023 arrests; DPP v. Ziegler [2021].
Remedy: Repeal restrictive protest laws; restore jury trials.

Strand 6: Breach of Magna Carta 1215 (Clause 40)

Breach: Legal aid cuts and secret family courts deny justice.
Evidence: MoJ data; 2023 transparency reviews.
Remedy: Restore legal aid; ban secret hearings except in national security cases.

Strand 7: Breach of Common Law Principles

Breach: Statute prioritised over equity undermines constitutional balance.
Evidence: Judicial training records.
Remedy: Mandate common law training; prioritise equity.

Strand 8: Breach of the House of Lords Act 1999

Breach: Removal of hereditary peers weakened scrutiny.
Evidence: Voting alignment data.
Remedy: Reinstate hereditary peers or create independent council.

Strand 9: Breach of Ministerial Code

Breach: Unpunished violations erode accountability.
Evidence: COVID-19 Inquiry, Hansard.
Remedy: Put Ministerial Code into statute with enforcement powers.

Strand 10: Corporate Usurpation of Governance

Breach: Public bodies registered as corporations breach constitutional status.
Evidence: Companies House filings.
Remedy: Deregister constitutional offices.

Strand 11: Subordination to Foreign Powers

Breach: Compliance with UN, WHO, ECHR overrides sovereignty.
Evidence: WHO pandemic treaty talks.
Remedy: Require parliamentary supermajority for sovereignty-impacting treaties.

Strand 12: Breach of Separation of Powers

Breach: Whip system destroys legislative independence.
Evidence: Hansard records.
Remedy: Abolish whips for constitutional matters.

Strand 13: Abuse of Statutory Instruments

Breach: Major policy by secondary legislation bypasses scrutiny.
Evidence: SI volume statistics.
Remedy: Require primary legislation for rights-impacting measures.

Strand 14: Public Order and Censorship Legislation

Breach: Public Order Act suppresses dissent.
Evidence: Arrest data 2023–2025.
Remedy: Repeal provisions; protect protest rights.

Strand 15: Breach of Parliamentary Due Process

Breach: Bills passed without full readings.
Evidence: Hansard records.
Remedy: Mandatory three readings and public consultation.

Strand 16: Misuse of the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022

Breach: PM controls dissolution, removing public power.
Remedy: Citizen-triggered dissolution via petition.

Strand 17: Unlawful Taxation

Breach: Spending without direct consent breaches Bill of Rights.
Remedy: Public referendums for major expenditure.

Strand 18: Breach of Crown’s Fiduciary Duty

Breach: Royal silence on breaches violates duty.
Remedy: Public reaffirmation of duty; suspend prerogatives if non-compliant.

Strand 19: Misprision of Treason

Breach: Officials ignore breaches, aiding treason.
Remedy: Legal notices and tribunals.

Strand 20: Suppression of Remedy

Breach: Censorship and arrests obstruct redress.
Remedy: Judicial inquiry; protect remedies.

Strand 21: Unlawful Recognition of Foreign States

Breach: Recognising Palestine without parliamentary vote exceeds powers.
Remedy: Supermajority requirement.

Strand 22: Betrayal via Immigration and Veteran Neglect

Breach: Mass immigration from hostile states while neglecting veterans.
Remedy: Inquiry; legislate veteran priority.

Strand 23: Institutional Betrayal of Children

Breach: Systemic neglect and cover-up of abuse breaches safeguarding laws and international duties.
Evidence: Jay Report, IICSA, Telford Inquiry, Knowl View.
Remedy: Independent Safeguarding Commission; prosecutions; transparency mandate.

Strand 24: COVID PPE “VIP Lane” Unlawful Procurement

Breach: High Court found preferential PPE contracts for political contacts unlawful.
Evidence: Good Law Project v. SoS for Health, 2022.
Remedy: Reform procurement law; criminal investigations.

Strand 25: PPE Medpro / Baroness Mone Fraud Allegations

Breach: Concealed financial interest; unsafe PPE; misuse of public office.
Evidence: High Court filings; Hansard admissions.
Remedy: Prosecution for fraud and misfeasance.

Strand 26: Post Office Horizon IT Scandal

Breach: Wrongful prosecutions despite known IT flaws.
Evidence: Bates v. Post Office Ltd; Inquiry reports.
Remedy: Criminal accountability; compensation.

Strand 27: Owen Paterson / Randox Lobbying Scandal

Breach: Breach of lobbying ban; £500m COVID contracts without competition.
Remedy: Strengthen lobbying rules; annul contracts obtained unlawfully.

Strand 28: Unlawful Surveillance of Journalists

Breach: IPT found Met Police and PSNI unlawfully spied on journalists.
Remedy: Criminal penalties; strengthen source protection.

Strand 29: Met Police Institutional Corruption (Daniel Morgan Case)

Breach: Decades-long obstruction in murder investigation.
Remedy: Independent anti-corruption unit with prosecutorial powers.

Strand 30: Tower Hamlets Councillors – Foreign Influence in Governance

Breach:
Councillors alleged to have acted under foreign allegiance or influence, contrary to the Bill of Rights 1689 which forbids “any foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate” from having jurisdiction or authority within the realm.

Such conduct undermines the Act of Settlement 1701 which secures the liberties of the subject against foreign power, and may amount to misfeasance in public office or even high treason if allegiance to a foreign power is established.

Evidence: Bill of Rights 1689; Act of Settlement 1701; Treason Act 1351; National Security Act 2023 (FIRS registration requirements).

Remedy: Suspension and investigation of councillors; nullification of unlawful decisions; application of treason and security statutes; establishment of parliamentary commission to prevent foreign infiltration.

Counterargument Rebuttal: Personal faith or heritage does not breach the Constitution. The breach arises only where allegiance, funding, or instruction is sourced from a foreign power. Concealment of such influence is both unconstitutional and criminal.

Strand 31: Denial of English Parliamentary Representation

Breach:
England is uniquely denied its own Parliament, while Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland possess devolved legislatures.

This violates Magna Carta 1215 (Clauses 39–40), Bill of Rights 1689 (Articles 1 and 13), Act of Settlement 1701, Acts of Union 1707 and 1800, and the common law principle of equality before the law.

The “West Lothian Question” demonstrates that English citizens are subjected to decisions by MPs from devolved nations on matters that apply only to England, stripping them of equal constitutional representation.

Evidence: Devolution Acts 1998; Hansard debates acknowledging the “West Lothian Question”; voting records showing MPs from devolved nations legislating on England-only issues.

Remedy: Establish an English Parliament with devolved powers equal to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, or dissolve Westminster for breach of constitutional settlement. Petitions, affidavits, and judicial review to be filed as lawful remedy.

Counterargument Rebuttal: Political convenience does not override constitutional equality. The union was conditional on equal treatment — denial of an English Parliament fractures the settlement in law.

Conclusion and Lawful Demand:

The above breaches, substantiated by statute, precedent, and evidence, demonstrate a deliberate dismantling of the UK’s constitutional order. We, the People of the Realm, hereby issue this affidavit of objection, placing the Crown and Parliament on notice of constitutional collapse.

We demand:

Immediate dissolution of Parliament via lawful mechanism under common law.

Suspension of the monarch’s legislative prerogatives until compliance with statutory duties.

A public audit and restoration of constitutional order under Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, and common law.

Signed:
Maximilian-rex Cromwell

We now have 34 Judicial reviews.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@TheConstit71705 @Keir_Starmer Here’s a few more

https://t.co/kneHLi1h7s

https://t.co/Rm6OPc3M2P

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

In no particular order:

-Administering Noxious Substances.

-Malfeasance in public office.

-Misappropriation of funds.

-Acquiescence to Torture.

-Dereliction of duty.

-Hate crimes.

-Murder.

-Assault.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@KingBobIIV People want to take performative measures, not actual action.
They’d rather go to a pressure relief gathering, which will do fuck all in all honesty.
Atleast hold it mid week and bring the city to a halt, make some people sit up and pay attention.
But hey, Grifter’s gonna grift.

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@RupertLowe10 Rupert, would you host a poll asking if people would like independence for England?
You say you’re here for the citizens of the Country, the same as every other MP, but they just talk the talk, with no action.
I think alot more people would get onboard if you

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@UnityNewsNet My money is on the US Bank Tower in LA

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

https://t.co/dqx8rsqXsT
Please take the time to fill in this survey

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@BasilTheGreat https://t.co/m5Clw2vLHX
(2)(b) ‘purporting to perform his official duties when he instigates the commission of the offence or consents to or acquiesces in it’
(6) ‘A person who commits the offence of torture shall be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for life’

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

If there is any hostility, retaliatory hostility, and it just so happens to be directed at a Muslim, it might be warranted

Respect, integration and being a wanker might have something to do with it

Don’t be a cunt, and you might not get treated as such. Simple

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@BasilTheGreat @GBNEWS Rumour has it, he’s going to be the new Anti-Muslim hostility tsar

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

https://t.co/Cnkilzhh6W

@RupertLowe10 @Lewis_Brackpool @cfdownes_ @RestoreBritain_
Can one of you speak to @englishexit and set up a seminar with him please

Nice one @liamtuffs1 Thanks for having Graham on 👍🏻

[Liam Tuffs @liamtuffs1]

Who REALLY Controls The World: @englishexit
Full interview premieres Sunday 08th March, 6pm on YouTube & Spotify 🎥🎧
The Dozen with Liam Tuffs (Trailer) 🎬

[Andy The Gabby Cabby @gabby_cabby]

Having spent a lot of time looking into the constitutional side of things, there is something about the United Kingdom that most people simply don’t realise.

Look at the structure of the country as it exists today.

Scotland has its own Parliament.
Wales has the Senedd.
Northern Ireland has its Assembly.
All three are recognised politically as nations with their own governing institutions.
Now look at England.

England is the largest nation on these islands by a huge margin. Over 50 million people.

And yet England has no parliament of its own at all.

Instead the UK Parliament in Westminster acts as two things at the same time.

It acts as the parliament of the United Kingdom, but it also acts as the domestic parliament for England.

Think about what that means in practice.

MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland can vote on laws that affect England internally, while England itself has no constitutional institution representing it as a nation.

So the largest nation in the Union is effectively invisible inside the system that governs it.

That imbalance is one of the reasons politics in this country feels so broken.

This isn’t about race.
It isn’t about ethnicity.

It’s about constitutional reality.

England exists.
England has interests.
England has laws and a constitutional history that long predate the United Kingdom.
But politically England has been folded into a system where it no longer exists as a governing unit.

And the political class never want that conversation to happen.

I’m just a working-class cab driver who took the time to read the history and the constitutional material.
If I can do that, anyone can.
People need to start educating themselves.

[Andy The Gabby Cabby @gabby_cabby]

Having watched the Interview with @benhabib6 and @danwootton I have reached the point where I can no longer contain my anger and frustration over the situation with @_AdvanceUK

As an Englishman looking at this it is becoming increasingly apparent that the political class are petrified of the English. The primary reason for this is we are by far the largest population of these Isles (Currently 50+ million) and our laws will quite literally eviscerate all of the problems that come with the United Kingdom and its Centrist / Communist way of doing things which in the words of @RupertLowe10 needs tearing limb from limb.

It is an important concept you understand that the United Kingdom is not a country in the real sense, it was created by the Acts Of Union and if void it is gone.

The Countries are England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and the people of those countries are the real sovereign and NOT parliament.

Many parties have existed over the years to denigrate and dissolve England and the English. They know who they are and I have know need to list them but suffice it to say I am shocked that figures like @benhabib6 who have supported the English and England behind closed doors question its very existence when interviewed by people like @danwootton and literally question the existence of the English as a very ethnicity and then have the cheek to mention ethnonationalism when challenged.

I refer you to MacCormick v Lord Advocate and the judgment of Lord President Cooper (1953) which states:
"The principle of the unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively English principle…"

This judgement is just one among many that proves the existence of an English Only Nationality (as backed up by the 2011 Census where over 30million declared)

A major point of contention is that English Law contains many of the things that fix our issues. Check the attached picture for one thing that would rid us of the communists (and facists). Its interesting to note that the Act Of Settlement 1701 states that anyone not born of English Parents can be in public office. This was effectively repealed by the British Nationality Act 1948.

I am telling you that people in positions of influence either know this and are ignoring it for nefarious reasons or they are basically clueless, in any event this is a dangerous time.

As and Englishman I believe in the idea of a brotherhood of nations and our own independent governances then coming together in times of need this is the model that existed prior to the acts of union.

It is obvious that @_AdvanceUK exists to support the United Kingdom and in my view makes them comparable with the others in the uniparty they claim to want to destroy. I can't support that.

Referring to @job_west_ words in his video it is a big reveal about how English looking after our own have been gas lit behind the scenes by those we thought wanted to help fix everything.

@RestoreBritain_ and @RupertLowe10 clearly understand whats going on along with the constitutional setup of England. Listening to what they have to say, I include @cfdownes_ they get it! and must be supported.

@RestoreBritain_ and England have something in common right now and that is the fact we are both under attack along racial lines. I can see the direction it comes from and I can see the online influencers who shockingly are encouraging this.

Lastly the Act Of Settlement 1701 section I told you about earlier was put in place to protect us against the dutch who are white!

This is a very dangerous and uncertain time right now and the people who are nefarious are revealing themselves in droves. You must stop taking the word that people tell you as gospel and learn things yourself. Only with the power of knowledge can we get through this.

All English must do there duty and do it now.

I am a working class cab driver and I have educated myself which means you can aswell.

Thanks for reading my long (semi) rant!

cc: @RupertLowe10 @job_west_ @englishexit

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

There isn’t many, but, when @EMBurlingame speaks, I listen

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Fascinating interview which is a must watch for those who want to know what’s happening https://t.co/06rR8NgdEV

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@laralogan Nick Griffin was talking about this 20+ years ago.
They use Tommy because he’s controlled by Israel, hence the timing of him being rolled out to the US a few days before it kicked off with Iran.
You should’ve asked him why he took £8k from Quilliam to leave The EDL/JDL

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 For the people 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @WasGreatBritain]

@real_shirelass Have a look into Laser Energy, if you’re not familiar with it. They supply 100+ local council’s and 200+ public sector bodies.
It’s operated by Commercial Services Group Ltd, which is owned by Kent County Council.
Energy procurement, Net Zero consulting and LED installations