🔔💥Wheaton, Illinois a town with a population of just 2,000 people in 1896.
💥And they supposedly decided to build this massive, castle like courthouse? With all that intricate stonework, a tower, grand arches, and the sheer scale of it? Make it make sense.
💥A town of 2,000 inhabitants; most of them farmers and regular folks, somehow had the resources, the labor, the organization, and the will to erect a palace like this With horse-drawn carts and hand tools?
💥This building was clearly already there. Tiny 19th-century towns were supposedly casually building castles while the rest of the population lived in wooden shacks. America’s past was covered up.
#tartaria #america #tech #energy
Interesting point on the appearance of something being done in public yet nothing changes in private.
We know that Chelsea Handler was a child who was raped by Andrew and forced to murder another of his female child victims and her subsequent role in procurement of children for such evil reasons. His arrest was captured by photographers and reported in MSM.
Caution: may induce trauma.
https://t.co/tbKZbLGVgz
ANDY BURNHAM: FRAUDSTER?
Mr Burnham didn’t Leave Manchester.
Mr Burnham FLED Manchester
There are Two Very Suspicious Arrangements Burnham is Involved in:
1/ His Dealings with his friend, the Manchester Property Developer, Daren Whitaker, who received nearly £800 Million from Greater Manchester while Burnham headed the Finance Committee.
Whitaker refused to Build the Affordable Housing agreed in the Contract, building Skyscrapers and Luxury Apartments.
Whitaker took £40 Million in Personal Dividends and Decamped to the Tax Haven Monaco.
This would be Illegal.
Unless the Chairman of the Finance Committee agreed to the Dividend.
Mr Burnham had to agree.
But now refuses to discuss the matter.
OR RELEASE THE OFFICIAL MINUTES.
Is Andy Burnham Corrupt??
He is about to become the PRIME MINISTER OF GREAT BRITAIN.
I Think It’s Time We Find Out Before The Coronation.
2/ Burnham’s dealings with his Wife.
Although She Never Took His Name.
Confused? Me Too…
“Marie-France van Heel, she is a director of Be.EV & Iduna Infrastructure, she is also Chief Marketing and Customer Officer for Octopus Energy.
In these rolls she secured a contract to supply EV infrastructure and energy to Greater Manchester Combined Authority, the famous “Bus” project the now ex mayor of Manchester boasts about. The only matter Andy B fails to boast about is the lady who got the contracts is, in fact.
MR BURNHAM’S WIFE…
For the UK Media now kissing Burnham’s Ring and the Labour Party members hoping to get the Cabinet positions they crave:
BURNHAM IS A SAINT
BUT THE REALITY SEEMS VERY, VERY DIFFERENT
Perhaps @KemiBadenoch and @RupertLowe10 Should Take a Look.
TODAY…
A farmer dies in April 2026.
His son inherits the farm. The farm has been in the family since 1847.
The farm consists of: 300 acres of grazing pasture, a farmhouse built in 1892, a barn, a milking parlour, two tractors of varying ages, a Land Rover that runs about 70% of the time, and a herd of 180 Hereford-cross cattle.
On paper, the farm is worth approximately £3.2 million. This is because land near him has been bought recently by a London hedge fund looking for carbon credits, which has dragged the comparable value of every field within forty miles upward to a number nobody local can justify.
In cash, the farm produces a profit of about £28,000 a year in a good year. In a bad year it loses money. The son also works as a fencing contractor three days a week to keep the operation viable.
The inheritance tax bill on a £3.2 million estate, even at the reduced 20% rate, comes to approximately £140,000 after the increased threshold is applied. The son does not have £140,000. The son has never had £140,000. The son has £4,200 in his current account and an overdraft.
The son sells 60 acres to a developer to pay the tax. The developer puts solar panels on the 60 acres. The remaining herd cannot be sustained on the reduced land. The herd is sold. The barn becomes a holiday let.
A different family eats Brazilian beef this Christmas without knowing why the price went up.
The Treasury collects £140,000.
The land never produces British food again.
SERCO, Obamacare, Prince William and Child Trafficking
Have you been down this 🕳🐇
Never forget why we started
It always was, and still is about the children
Crimes Against Our Children
Military is the only way⚔️⚔️
No Deals !!!
NCSWIC 💞🌹🕊🌍💫
These extravagant buildings weren't erected for lunatics, they were founded, and the people they contained weren't insane.
A cyclical reset by new Controllers or evidence of Satan's release after the Millennial Reign?
#Reset#InsaneAsylums#LunaticAsylums#HiddenHistory
#OrphanAsylums #OrphanTrains #CabbagePatchBabies #WorldsFairs #LittleSeason
Credit: nashoba_wakerupper IG
THE MILIBAND BROTHERS: CRIME SYNDICATE
THE TIMELINE THAT NOW DEMANDS ANSWERS**
And why today’s asbestos revelation makes Miliband’s silence untenable...
For more than a year, the government has insisted that the UK–China “clean energy partnership” is nothing unusual — just routine cooperation, nothing to see here.
But the timeline tells a very different story, and today’s news about asbestos found IN Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines turns this from a policy debate into a public‑safety and national‑security issue.
Here is the sequence of events that now requires full transparency.
🔹 March 2025 — Ed Miliband signs a Memorandum of Understanding with China
He travels to Beijing and signs a wide‑ranging MoU covering:
- Offshore wind
- Electricity grids
- Battery storage
- Carbon capture
- Hydrogen
These are not minor areas. These are **critical national‑infrastructure sectors**.
🔹 March 2025 – February 2026 — The MoU is kept out of public view**
For almost a year, the agreement is not published, not debated in Parliament, and not disclosed to the public.
No press release.
No ministerial statement.
No scrutiny.
🔹 27 February 2026 — The MoU is quietly released.
No announcement. No explanation.
It simply appears on a government website.
The timing and the silence raise immediate questions.
🔹 Spring 2026 — Miliband repeatedly refuses to release the full details.
Across multiple interviews, he:
- Dodges direct questions
- Repeats scripted lines about “normal cooperation”
- Avoids explaining what China gains
- Avoids explaining what UK infrastructure China may influence
- Refuses to publish the full text or annexes
This is not transparency
This is avoidance
🔹 June 2026 — RUSI warns of deepening UK dependence on Chinese supply chains
A respected defence think tank warns that the UK’s offshore‑wind expansion risks:
- Strategic dependence
- Supply‑chain vulnerability
- Loss of control over critical components
Miliband does not address these warnings directly.
🔹 TODAY —
Asbestos found in Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines
This is the moment everything changes.
Asbestos is banned in the UK.
It is a known carcinogen
Its presence in imported turbine components is a **major regulatory failure**.
This is no longer a theoretical risk.
This is a **real‑world safety breach** involving the very sector Miliband has tied to deeper cooperation with China.
THE QUESTIONS ED MILIBAND MUST NOW ANSWER:
1. Why did you refuse to release the full China MoU for so long?
A year‑long delay followed by a quiet publication is not normal practice for a major international agreement.
2. Does the MoU expand Chinese involvement in UK offshore wind projects?
The public deserves clarity on whether Chinese firms gain access to UK tenders, supply chains, or grid‑related work.
3. Were you aware of asbestos risks in imported turbine components?
If yes, why was the public not informed?
If no, why were safety checks inadequate?
4. What due‑diligence processes exist for foreign‑manufactured renewable‑energy components?
Today’s revelation suggests they are either weak or non‑existent.
5. Will you now publish the full MoU, including annexes, technical notes, and implementation plans?
Partial transparency is not transparency.
6. How will the government ensure that UK infrastructure is not compromised by unsafe or non‑compliant imports?
This is a matter of public health and national security.
7. Why should the public trust your assurances when the supply chain has already failed at the most basic safety level?
The asbestos discovery undermines every claim of “routine cooperation” and “nothing to worry about.”
**WHY THIS MATTERS**
This is not about geopolitics.
This is not about party politics.
This is about:
- Public safety
- Regulatory integrity
- National infrastructure
- Transparency in government
When a minister signs an agreement with a foreign power covering critical infrastructure, the public has the right to know **exactly** what was agreed — especially when components from that same country are now found to contain banned carcinogenic materials.
The refusal to release the MoU is no longer a procedural issue.
It is now a **public‑interest emergency**
Given The Potential Corruption of Two Brothers from the Marxist End of Labour.
Ed handing out Huge Green Energy Contracts.
Brother David sitting on the Board of a company seeking to make money from the same Contracts.
IT IS TIME PARLIAMENT, AND THE POLICE TOOK AN INTEREST IN THE CHINESE DEAL
Good morning excellent patriots!
Sadly, it is rare today to hear church bells on a Sunday morning.
So enjoy & share these beautiful church bells of St Mary's, Warwick.
Bells playing "I vow to thee my country"
Truly inspirational!
" [Shocking] A 'painting of a dragon' that lay unknown to all for 380 years is discovered during restoration work at a church. It's all too dramatic..."