Starmer Arson Trial - BBC story is threadbare. And what’s with the rush to put out a Panorama suggesting Russian involvement- the day after the oil tanker stunt that was exposed so well by @CraigMurrayOrg?
The UK was over 95% White up until the 90s.
That is until a Jewish woman called Barbara Roche became Minister of State for Asylum and Immigration under Tony Blair and opened the gates of hell on the unsuspecting British population.
I wonder how many British citizens know this.
@Hitchslap1 The one food the human body can live off alone with no water is allegedly honey. No wonder they are attacking bee hives all over the West. They found honey that is 3000yrs old and still edible as it never goes off.
🎯💯👀 they are using our taxes to facilitate it with the NGOs. Who is running all the NGOs is worth you investigating too. Keep up the good work shining a spotlight on it all 🫡👍
@EssexPR That all will work stopping benefits if you not a citizen and a threshold of min tax paid for foreign born citizens before eligibility, and we all need to collectively stop paying council tax for 3mths to show the predator class that we won't stand for this any longer.
It is pointless trying to understand the contemporary British media complex as ‘media’ in the conventional sense—journalism, reporting, or even opinion. The correct frame is propaganda: mood and sentiment management, with its sharpest tool today being crisis communications.
The dominant technique, visible daily if you still watch, is inversion—systematic reversal. It flips reality: victim into perpetrator, aggressor into defender, truth into falsehood, good into evil. It constructs Walter Lippmann’s ‘pseudo-environment’, an alternate reality in which the public is meant to dwell.
A key subtype is projection, or ‘accusation in a mirror’, neatly summarised by a Rwandan Hutu propagandist in a 1990s manual: impute to your enemies exactly what you and your own side are planning or doing.
When a genuine crisis erupts—such as the racially aggravated murder of Henry Nowak—the first imperative of the machine is to stall, dampen, and defeat the natural eruption of public outrage.
Call it ‘restoring calm’ if you like the euphemism. In practice, it means herding people back into anaesthetised normality so that inversion can resume.
Once the majority has been shamed, distracted, or bullied into silence, the remnant still angry can be ridiculed by the usual chorus—eye-rolling panellists on Have I Got News for You, columnists sneering at those ‘harping on’, and accusations of crypto-racism or worse.
Thus, the brutal stabbing of an unarmed 18-year-old student, the false cry of racism by his killer, and the police reportedly handcuffing the dying boy as he bled out on a Southampton street is repackaged as another ‘knife crime’ tragedy (note Shaban Mahmood’s flaccid parliamentary statement this afternoon)—preferably illustrated with a generic white face in the style of the BBC's so-called reality-based drama 'Adolescence' or the more recent but equally putridly manipulative 'The Capture'.
Real patterns (grooming gangs, crime disparities, two-tier policing) are airbrushed. This is projection at work: the actual sources of predation and institutional failure are recast, while legitimate grievance is pathologized.
The truth? The system enabled both the attack and the immediate inversion of its aftermath and that stands exposed to anyone with eyes and functioning brain by the video evidence. That’s the problem, your own 'lying eyes', that crisis communications has to handle before there can be a return to normal levels of public mood management can be restored.
This is precisely what Dan Hodges is performing when he labels people demanding we talk about the murder ‘scum’ for refusing to respect the family’s wish that their son’s death not be politicised. It is phase-one grunt work in the inversion protocol: shame the angry back into silence so the pseudo-environment can be restored.
Smart enough to know his role, malleable enough to perform it willingly—exactly as Noam Chomsky described the filtering process that keeps the right sort of voice prominent in the system.
The technique still works on some. But it is wearing thin. Every overplayed inversion, every *scummy* dismissal of raw public grief, prepares the ground for sharper identities and clearer grievances against the system itself. Normal people do not remain moderate forever when the machine insists their reality is the problem.
They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.
@selfupgrade222 Apart from number 5, sex and drugs still works but otherwise tick every box! Or it could also be the signs of getting old and becoming the inevitable grumpy old man syndrome tbh!
The reason we think dandelions are weeds is because of a 1950s marketing campaign.
Dandelions, native to Europe and Asia, were brought to North America in the 1600s by European colonists who grew them deliberately.
Every part is edible. The leaves are a salad green, the flowers were made into wine, and the roots were roasted as a coffee substitute and used medicinally for liver and kidney conditions for thousands of years. They were a kitchen-garden staple well into the 1800s.
The shift happened after World War II, when 2,4-D (originally developed for chemical warfare research) was approved as a residential herbicide. Companies like Scotts built the modern lawn-care industry around the idea that a perfect green lawn meant zero broadleaf plants.
Dandelions, being bright yellow and resistant to mowing, became a visible enemy, and the campaign worked. By the 1970s, "dandelion-free" was synonymous with "well-kept."
They aren't native, but they aren't doing significant ecological harm either. The herbicides used to kill them, on the other hand, kill bees, contaminate groundwater, and have been linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans.
If you hate dandelions, it's most likely due to a marketing campaign that ran before you were born.
@RishiSunak@PCR_News Erm doesnt the new hairbrained govt policy to add Folic Acid to all white bread actually increase the likelihood of men getting prostate cancer? Now why would they bring in such a mass drug experiment with serious side effects on men specifically...
I'll make it simple: the climate crisis was a hoax that made them richer. Now they need oil and gas for the data centres that are the digital cage. This should be easy by now.
If anyone is unaware of the United Nations Agenda 2030, a great place to start is THIS 👇video.
There is a longer (full) version on youtube.
People need to wake up to this FAST!
I beg you!
@Essex_Patriot@livelovenofear They want to squeeze us so much & destroy our society so people will willingly sign up for digital ID to access UBI. Sociopaths are in charge all over the place its chilling and dystopian & all part of their Fabian/digital-commie plan. People need to wake up fast, but they are.