WanyeRemington

Professional chaos coordinator | Turning hot takes into viral threads | I say what others are thinking (then get ratio'd for it) | DMs open for memes & collabs

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

We all need a little humor. This will make you laugh.

[NO CONTEXT HUMANS @HumansNoContext]

This will never not be funny

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@_MorenoBello @diharagirimana Funny 😆

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@DezBryant These disrespectful replies will only motivate you. The more hate they throw, the more it confirms your points.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@IsaacHayes3 Bro, it’s all about the money for you. You’re privileged and entitled AF. Anyone can research you. The grift is obvious. I'm sure you have white friends, but your racism runs deep.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@CollinRugg Something is wrong here.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@DezBryant You’re a true free thinker. I may agree or disagree with you, but I respect your right to think for yourself. That’s rare and unpopular these days. I applaud you for refusing to let others dictate what you think. It takes real strength to speak truth. Keep being you. 💯

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

Labeling this murder conviction “Jim Crow justice” is a serious claim that deserves evidence, not just disappointment with the verdict.
The jury had no Black members, which has rightly raised questions about representation. But it was not all-white — it included Asian, Hispanic, and Middle Eastern jurors. They heard days of testimony, including from Anthony’s own teammates and multiple student witnesses who described him as the aggressor: he refused repeated requests to leave the rival team’s tent, warned “touch me and see what happens,” reached into his bag, pulled a knife, and stabbed an unarmed 17-year-old in the chest.
The system — jurors, judge, prosecution, and defense — reviewed the evidence and rejected the self-defense claim after deliberation. You and I weren’t in the courtroom for the full testimony or video. Jumping straight to systemic racism dismisses that process when the outcome doesn’t match a preferred narrative.
The same legal system has produced verdicts people on all sides have cheered or criticized (OJ, Chauvin, etc.). Applying it consistently means accepting results based on evidence presented, not retrofitting race into every disappointing outcome.
Holding anyone accountable for bringing a knife to a verbal dispute and using lethal force shouldn’t automatically become a racial litmus test. Justice requires facts first — for every victim and every defendant, regardless of background.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@ZeekArkham You’re incredible. We face challenges from both sides. We need more people like you and fewer people like them. 💪💪

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@TaraBull Shannon Sharpe is spending a lot of money on this kind of stuff. 😆

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

History lesson: Iroquois wiped out Huron/Erie, Comanche dominated plains tribes, Aztecs subjugated neighbors, Sioux/Osage expanded by war. Every group on Earth conquered & was conquered. No ‘pure’ first owners.
Land Back ignores human history. Conquest is the rule, not the exception. Move on. 🇺🇸

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@ReginaldWebb15 Big achievement, congrats!

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@TicketTV1 Command and conquer. It's pretty simple — the Indians lost the battle. Check it out, the whole world has seen this. I'm American Indian, by the way.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@MarindaVannoy1 Hilarious. 😁

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@IsaacHayes3 This is your personal opinion. Virtue signaling as well. Someone should tell him.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@Mappy6984 Everyone has their own way of doing it. Congratulations to all.
https://t.co/Tjie5ex7XG

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@dom_lucre Is Sophie Rain her stripper name? 👀

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

Disagreement isn’t an attack, it’s how ideas get tested. She posted publicly, so pushback is fair game. History’s free thinkers (MLK, Galileo, abolitionists) faced real attacks and sharp disagreement. The difference? Attacks target the person. Disagreement targets the argument. We can defend her right to speak without shielding her view from scrutiny. That’s the line.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@ArenaGridiron @AqibTalib21 @RealSkipBayless This is the kind of guy you'd want in your locker room.

[WanyeRemington @WayneRemington]

@DezBryant All you stood for was freedom of choice, and these crazies want to attack you. This is how they operate. If you don’t align with their way of thinking, they will try to destroy you.