The irony 😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡
Here’s one for you whoppers…
“May I remember each day how much I have to be grateful for.
Help me not to take for granted the food on my table, the roof over my head, the people I love, and the safety and opportunities I have been given.
When I see someone who has less than I do, let me not judge them or turn away, but ask what I can do to help.
Teach me to share what I have, to give without expecting anything in return, and to remember that circumstances can change for any of us.
May my gratitude make me generous, my good fortune make me compassionate, and my blessings remind me to be a blessing to others.
Let me appreciate what I have, while never forgetting those who have less.
Amen.”
@TRobinsonNewEra Number 1...you're not Christians.
It's quite insulting that you do.
Bearing false witness is a one way ticket to Hell.
2. You seem to have confused patriot with parasite.
@craigbromf@TiceRichard Which is why we have to vote tactically at the next GE.
We cannot let Tory 2.0 get into power.
They can't even run councils efficiently.
Here is the thing Richard! These are different offences entirely - with offenses being a questionable term.
Thomas wasn't charged for "stopping illegal immigration", he is charged with criminal damage and failing to comply with a RIPA notice, over an incident where he filmed himself slashing a boat in the Channel with an emergency responder on board.
That's not enforcement work; it's an act that could have hurt someone.
Intentions, (even though you think it is good), don't excuse the law.
Even if his motive was to deter crossings, damaging property and endangering a rescue worker is still a crime, regardless of the cause behind it.
That's not a double standard - it's how the law applies to everyone.
Illegal Channel crossings and criminal damage at sea are legally unrelated. Asylum seekers are rarely prosecuted for illegal entry partly because of Article 31 of the Refugee Convention, which protects people claiming asylum who present themselves promptly - a legal policy, not neglect.
Stacking "80,000 uncharged" against one specific charge implies hypocrisy that isn't really there.
The 80,000 figure needs scrutiny - it likely refers to irregular arrivals, not to people who've committed a provable, chargeable offence, which is the actual CPS test.
People's frustration with Channel crossings reflects a real and widely shared political concern about border enforcement. That's a legitimate debate - but separate from whether this particular charge is fair.
There is also the absolute fact that you and @Nigel_Farage are largely responsible for the problem.
@RandyWi54805524@TRobinsonNewEra@PatriotWoman22 In addition, I wouldn't pay much attention to what Tommy Robinson tells you.
He has multiple convictions for fraud and violence.
He lives a millionaire lifestyle by collecting money off his gullible supporters.
At present, illegal immigration is down, deportations are up.
@RandyWi54805524@TRobinsonNewEra@PatriotWoman22 In the history of Western civilization this has only ever happened actually happened when fascists have taken control.
I come from a military family and I can assure you that your AR15 wouldn't save you from a platoon of well trained soldiers.