🏁 Start your engines!
Craft custom rides, race friends, and cruise in style. Survival-friendly, high-speed fun with epic sound effects!
🔥 By DiamondCraft | Published by Waypoint Studios
🟩 On the Minecraft Marketplace
#Minecraft#MinecraftMarketplace#MinecraftCars
We're Waypoint Studios, your route to the Minecraft Marketplace.
Want to turn your Minecraft skins and worlds into real marketplace content? Join a team backed by the best in the game. We’ll help you build, publish, and get paid.
🔗 https://t.co/u85a2OhWjp
#Minecraft
Reign over your cherry blossom kingdom with this brand new Cherry Castle world by @StudiosTucano
Explore the large cherry castle with detailed interior and participate in 4 awesome quests!
https://t.co/GsVzrDwa0n
#Minecraft#MinecraftWorld#MinecraftMarketplace
Now on the Minecraft Marketplace! Black X Ruby by @DuckyCreations_
Impress everyone with these 12 stunning and trendy skins, Only 310 Minecoins!
#Minecraft#MinecraftSkins
Again there's very few if any tools / resources that are offered exclusively to partners. Tools are available on https://t.co/iGJYLVR57b and documentation is available at https://t.co/5ngqguOJrS
This seems to be a common form of misinformation fed to non-partnered creators. We have very little in the way of additional tools or information. What we do have access to are simply still unreliable and in-development and aren't ready for public access yet.
@Sprintermax@Nogard_YT I am not sure about this rule, and have never heard of it. Yes Mojang do review creators for activity but we're talking years not months between new items.
@Nogard_YT@Prowl8413 Ah this was 2023, yeah we've made a more conscious effort to provide detailed feedback since ~2024, its slowed down our time per review but I believe it has made the overall experience better.
So official publishers have always existed for example we have always been approved as a publisher from day one of our existence, the difference was there wasn't a crackdown on the teams doing it without permission, which is now what's happening.
There have also been more regulation of the rules, for example we're now contractually only allowed to charge 20% but this has always been our policy even before it became mandatory.
We aren't responsible for the creation of any of our content directly, we don't build, model etc. As a publisher we're required to use all of our slots (which we have more than the ordinary partner) to release only published content.
Sniper was a creator in our publisher program, although that is no longer the case.
We actively see this, people sending their first Minecraft build wanting to share it on the marketplace, sharing mcpedl add-ons that they like and want to see on the store even though they don't own them.
We take a lot of time to understand each applicant. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have ☺️
This feels like a generalisation, I don't know who your publisher was but, as previously mentioned we do provide specific reference to an individual's portfolio, including when an application is spam. We've had applications that claim https://t.co/Jq1sorAtV6 is their portfolio or even had work I've been involved in, as a creator, used as a portfolio piece from people I've never heard of.
We still respond to say that we want accurate and relevant applications, even though they're clearly wasting our time and theirs.
@Prowl8413@Nogard_YT Whilst it is handled by 3rd parties like us, we're actively monitored and work closely with Mojang. Where Mojang can focus on building the game and the creator ecosystem we can focus our energy helping creators understand the ecosystem.
We do link your channels in descriptions using youtubes own internal linking system if you ask and also all creators are featured at https://t.co/RHcGNBfg8J with their socials.
We know it's not ideal, but honestly it's the best tradeoff we have to maintain player safety which is the most important thing for us in this specific conversation.