@PLAION_ES@SNKPofficial Yes the US didnt mess the box art up on that one like most of the games. It's even better with the Japanese art though!
Buyers need the choice of buying the Japanese versions.
Regardless of results I really do like the way Slot speaks. Like Klopp he makes total sense in everything that he says and he also comes across as a really decent fella. Seems like we've got another good one.
@jon_s1989 I was going to say the exact same thing to you.
Even Klopp eventually criticised FSG and he is the last person in the world to say something public about the owners. Klopp will have been pulling his hair out with them.
@jon_s1989 Those Journos report what Liverpool want them to.
The lasting memory around the world is Liverpool were prepared to pay £110m for a player. The player went to Chelsea and everyone knows anything can happen when they're involved so no humiliation.
I said It was to get Lavia.
@TheRedmenTV 1 out of 10.
IJuve fans say they still haven't seen the best of Chiesa since the ACL and even at his best they say he's a bit of a head down merchant. We're basically weaker and now we have a player on big money that will block the space of a player we should have signed.
@jon_s1989 How naive are you? I'm not saying we didn't go through the formalities of it, I'm saying Liverpool knew we wouldn't sign him. It forced Chelsea's hand to actually sign Caicedo leaving LFC clear to sign Lavia. Liverpool (and nobody else) factored in Chelsea also signing Lavia.
@jon_s1989 It's debatable that we actually tried to sign Caicedo. His agent was never letting him go to us and player never wanted to either, Liverpool knew that.
Zubimendi was seen as right price for right player. My point is if he was £5m extra we wouldn't have tried to sign him.
Just to point out to the clueless Liverpool fans and pundits. £10m is not low risk when that player and his 4 year conteact then blocks us from buying the RIGHT player. He is not the right player, he's the cheap option that's a big name to keep the fans happy. Massive risk.
@KitHunters The difference is that we've chosen a cheap option just because it's a cheap option. We should have chose the correct option but FSG don't want to spend money. But hey, he's a big name so our fans will lap it up until they realise he's not good enough after that ACL.
@JazRignall I still remember the shop I bought this in. It was like seeing into the future! Ghouls'n Ghosts first pics 😍
Probably the most iconic computer magazine for me. I must have put a couple of hundred hours in to reading and looking at the pictures in that magazine, great job mate!
@jon_s1989 If you're being honest with yourself it's much more likely the idea is to pay as little as possible. So for instance if the player they actually wanted was £35m and their club insist on £42m FSG will cheap out instead.
No chance we sign VVD and Alisson without the Coutinho money.
@jon_s1989 Fair point, but I believe both players were bought solely based on price. Neither had the attributes that suited our style.
City bought the player of the year in Mahrez then hardly ever played him and spent 100m on Grealish and hardly play him. Players back themselves to play.
@ThatAnfieldBuzz@Corballyred If it's a player we think will defo improve us then you don't quibble you buy.
If it's a player that just gives another option that prob won't improve us then you drive the price down so at least you make profit when we flip him in a years time.
Read between the lines kid.