@AuthorTRobare Might want to check it in winston ai detector. This is what the university uses. 30% human written. I'm not saying the review is not the persons own view. But winston is what publishers use. Believe what you want but 30% human score. It's Ai written if you want to admit it or not
@AuthorTRobare A little bit hypocritical of you when you posted Paul Smiths 5star review on your own book everywhere and it's also very obviously written with Ai. If the author disclosed it and you did not buy it you probably shouldn't review bomb someone else's work regardless of how its made
Observation.
Author strongly against the use of Ai can't even recognise an Ai review of their work because it's so overwhelmingly posative.
๐คทโโ๏ธ
@BHolshouserUS I can understand that aspect. I don't agree with review bombing. Do you feel genuine sub 3 star reviews are warranted? In the context of you wouldn't accept substandard goods, even home made if they didn't perform to your expectations.
I'm sorry but if you left a five star review on this book you either did not read the book, or you condone child rape an pedaphelia. Which is it? Go ahead, come at me. I'll report you too.
From my writers group days, the 'show your first page' really made a statment on me of whos works I want to read, and who needs a lot more work with their writing. A lot of you only know how to tell and it shows in your first page.