Travis James

Some dude

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

We’ve never seen anything like this before. A man was conscripted into jury duty by the government. He performed his civic duty and followed his conscience, refusing to acquit a woman who confessed to systematically executing her three children. The defense attorney immediately launched a public smear campaign against the juror. Soon several other jurors joined the campaign. Then the media. Even the defense attorney’s wife has joined. Now they’re doxxing the man, digging into his past, contacting his family, showing up at his house. All of this both to punish him for refusing to go with their program, and to pollute any future jury pool by making it clear that anyone who votes to convict Clancy will have their life destroyed. It’s truly one of the most outrageously evil things we’ve ever seen from the Left, and that’s saying something. A direct assault on the integrity of our justice system. They are burning down every boundary and standard in their path. And doing it all for the sake of a child murdering psychopath. Unfathomable.

[Travis James @WeveNoNeedToH8]

@EllDee369 @BohemianAtmosp1 Carnivore diet has worked 100% for me. I have experimented going on and off this diet in the last three years and only times I got gout were when I’d returned to the SAD diet.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

In “Apocalypto,” Mel Gibson transports you into the mind of a Mayan 500 years ago. In “The Northman,” Robert Eggers transports you into the mind of a Viking a thousand years ago. In “The Odyssey,” Christopher Nolan transports you into the mind of a liberal woman in 2017.

[Mikki Willis Official @MikkiWillis]

Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along!

Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.”

They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying.

I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself.

What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude.

Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.”

To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few:

THE OTHER GUNMAN
An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case.
He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up.

DISPATCH AUDIO
911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.”

DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE
The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.”

DNA DISCREPANCIES
Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle.

INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS
During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment.

THE UNFIRED BULLET
During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was.

ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO
Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom.
As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims.
Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.”

As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture.

Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones.

And… exhale.

These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk.

What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions.

Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice.

This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people.

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

Mikki Willis
Investigative Filmmaker

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

DIRECTOR OF BIOETHICS AT NYU: "People eat too much meat… There’s this thing called the Lone Star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat…"

"That’s something we can do through human engineering."

This sounds like bioterrorism dressed up as bioethics.

[James Li @5149jamesli]

It’s a nonsense conspiracy that Bill Gates could dropping “tick bombs” to make us allergic to red meat, except for years bioethicists published scientific papers arguing that it would be “immoral” NOT to deploy these ticks.

I’m serious — they literally said this.

[Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 @Answers4Sean]

@NBCNews Wanna meet me at his grave? When are you coming? 🤔😡

[Dr. Simone Gold @drsimonegold]

REPOST if you believe in medical freedom.

[Dan Bilzerian @DanBilzerian]

The Epstein files were legally supposed to be released 146 days ago.

If citizens ignored court orders and federal law for 146 days, they’d be in jail.

When the government officials do it, nothing happens.

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

The United States has:
• 683,000+ heart disease deaths/year
• 620,000+ cancer deaths/year
• 250,000+ estimated deaths from medical error
Yet public health officials are running national fear campaigns about backyard chickens, raw milk, pet turtles, and hantavirus.
That is not rational public health prioritization.
That is theater.

[Mary Talley Bowden MD @MaryBowdenMD]

@NBCNews @ministerio1 Then the virus was manipulated to make it more transmissible.

[FLAT OUT TRUTH @TheFlatEartherr]

I admit, I preferred Stanley Kubrick’s original Moon Landing over Netflix’s Artemis. Kubrick’s had far more suspense and pacing, with better props and set design. Artemis was typical Netflix slop, recycled actors, overuse of green screen and CGI. It was boring.🥱

[フラットアース🌎❌ @FlatEarth_TW]

彼らは大規模な国家劇場の役者に過ぎません。本当の科学は提示されておらず、具体的な発見もなく、これらすべての「望遠鏡」で大陸を本当に拡大した映像もありません。証拠はなく、実物もない。あるのはただの見せ物であり、安価なトリック、CG、Photoshop、クロマキーなどで支えられた入念に演出されたショーなのです。すべてはギャラリーを楽しませ、彼らの物語を維持する為のものだ。

[King Arthur Fan @brandilwells]

💯🎯 Fuck the system

[Doc @DrBitcoinMD]

the Epstein files were so bad, they started WW3 and faked another moon mission

[David Of Fct🌝 @Dhavidote]

Too bad they cancelled this series.

[ALX 🇺🇸 @alx]

If Congress can’t pass a bill that 80% of the people agree with, what does that say about Congress?

[The Eagle flies free @Fa21519230]

🚨🚨 Perdió su licencia médica por estudiar a 3324 niños y demostrar que los niños no vacunados estaban mucho más sanos que los niños vacunados. Al igual que el estudio similar del Instituto de Salud Henry Ford, su trabajo fue censurado por la comunidad médica.
Dr. Paul Thomas.

[Bassem Youssef Commentary @bassem_youssef9]

The photo of this lady, who does not resemble Ghislaine Maxwell in any of her features, is a clear proof that Jeffrey Epstein is also alive.