@PhycheX2444@Edinburgh_CC Because there are too many of them and they are too incompetent. They need to show they are doing something - even if this is completely pointless.
@EidynConnect@Edinburgh_CC You can drive faster and drive safe - these two are not mutually exclusive. Unless lycra restricts blood flow to one's brain.
@Edinburgh_CC Any science backing this nonsense? Consider this a FOA request. Sometimes 20 will be too fast whilst in many cases 100 is perfectly safe. Rather than imposing nanny state rules get real.
@EDI_Airport don't you have any SLAs with your inferior quality taxi partner? @CapitalCars777 ? If your team cannot negotiate service level agreements in return for exclusivity someone should be let go.
@LivingStreetsEd And it shouldn't. There are objective research principles. If anything the question should ask what you think about the width of the pavement rather than suggesting a pre-determined outcome.
@EDI_Airport@EdinburghTrams@CapitalCars777 The remark about "most polluting" car transport is pitiful considering the footprint of aviation operations. I personally don't have anything against it, but relying on the impact of cars is rather laughable. Fire the intern who prepared the memo.
@EDI_Airport The spin you took in the PR memo is just hilarious. But do you really think that anyone is buying it? I doubt it. Talk to @EdinburghTrams and co-fund the fare drop. Kick out @CapitalCars777 who are a GDPR-breaching Mickey mouse operations (at least at the airport).