Ethiopia was never colonized.
For much of its history, it was one of the poorest countries on the continent.
Meanwhile, Vietnam was colonized by the French, devastated by decades of war, and is now on its way to serious economic prosperity.
If colonialism were the answer to why Africa is poor, Ethiopia should be rich and Vietnam should be broke. Neither is true.
Can we please retire this excuse?
“I am really alarmed at the hysteria in this country. It may well be a prelude to mob-rule!… Dons yelling ‘fascist’, at high table, at colleagues who in mild voices venture to disagree with them. What a rot and stink is left by liberalism devoid of religion!”
J.R.R. Tolkien
The Hobbits of the Shire were blissfully unaware that their peaceful idyllic lifestyle was only possible, and briefly at that, because the men of Gondor prevented the orcs from coming. The Ringwraiths took notice first searching for the ring (or was it home schools?) At the end of LOTR the orcs dispersed and took over the shire. All idyllic illusions were shattered. If we don't stand up to the savages they will eventually come for us. Alexander Solzhenitsyn can tell us all about it.
"Men did not love Rome because she was great. She was great because they had loved her."
GK Chesterton
"It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children."
JD Vance
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
Foresight of Jean-Marie Le Pen: explains Kant's 3 conditions for peace. He also affirms that France owed a debt to Algerians who had fought beside them but cautioned against the globalization of this position.
"He argues that French Muslims will face intense pressure from Islamist fundamentalists to renounce their French identity, because Islam does not separate the sacred from the secular — “religion is politics” (sharia makes no distinction between the religious and the political).
For this reason, he opposes the policy of mass Muslim immigration into France. He acknowledges a specific “duty of honor”: France had to welcome and fully integrate those Algerians (Harkis) who had fought on the French side and were at risk of massacre. He says this effort was not properly carried out over the previous 30 years.
However, he insists that France must not create the conditions for internal confrontation by continuing large-scale Muslim immigration. He links this to the broader global demographic problem: trying to “globalize” (mondialiser) demographic imbalances works against peace.
He then cites three conditions necessary for peace (referring to Kant (possibly):
1. Refusal of dictatorship — the basis for democracy.
2. Refusal of mondialism (globalism), because a single world state would inevitably be tyrannical.
3. Preventing the free movement of foreigners from turning into colonization/settlement in the host country.
@TheWorthyHouse Going in the wrong direction entirely. My own frustration is a tremendous amount of energy is spent on the theoretical on this site and much less on the "practical application" of Post Liberal conclusions.
@MobiusDick@AtticusRorDev@MarioNawfal What is your solution for the some 187,00 homeless people on the streets in California? "Freedom" is what got them where they are. "Freedom" is shitting all over the streets and dying and killing in them. Maybe we aren't "Freedoming" hard enough?
Britain had a moment of silence for George Floyd. Our politicians kneeled en masse to show their outrage at his killing. "I can't breathe" became a slogan.
George Floyd died on the other side of the world. He wasn't British.
Henry Nowak *was* British and his treatment by the police was shocking and negligent in the extreme. Yet there is no minute of silence. There is no coordinated public campaign. There is no kneeling at sporting events.
And we all know why.
During the summer of BLM, some people said "All Lives Matter". This was treated as the highest form of racism and anyone who said this was immediately cancelled. Why? Because the people in charge don't actually think all lives matter in the same way.
They have created a racial hierarchy of victimhood where a career criminal who died through mistreatment by police in a foreign country with 0 evidence of racism like George Floyd is automatically sanctified because of the colour of his skin.
And Henry Nowak, a British man, one of ours, is automatically dismissed and ignored because of the colour of his.
This is the ugly fruit of so-called "anti-racism", an obsession with race that has created a two-tier society which treats people differently because of the colour of their skin.
This needs to stop.
The Macpherson Report and the murder of Henry Nowak are causally linked through the corrosive logic of multiculturalism and its institutional offspring: two-tier policing.
By the time he was stabbed to death in December 2025, 18-year-old Henry Nowak would have been eight years younger than the 1999 Macpherson Report. The nature of the former—and especially the police response—is directly tied to the latter.
Sir William Macpherson’s inquiry into the Stephen Lawrence case redefined institutional racism expansively. It instructed police to prioritise perceptions of racism from minority complainants. This well-intentioned reform, born of genuine outrage at one racially motivated murder, embedded a structural bias: complaints from certain communities received swift deference, while the concerns of the native majority were often dismissed as prejudice.
Over a quarter-century, this shifted the state’s posture from impartial referee to quasi-imperial active manager of ethnic sensitivities.
Fast-forward to Southampton, 3 December 2025. Henry Nowak, a Polish-British student, was stabbed five times—including a fatal chest wound—by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa, who was legally carrying a 21cm kirpan, a privilege extended to no others in British society. As Henry lay dying in his own blood, Digwa falsely claimed racial abuse (citing a bruised eye). Officers handcuffed and arrested the victim rather than rendering immediate aid.
Police later apologised—unconvincingly, particularly after the leaked bodycam footage emerged. The IOPC is investigating. This is not mere incompetence. It is the predictable outcome of Macpherson’s legacy: officers socialised to fear being labelled racist more than failing to protect life.
Listen to Henry’s father. Watch the leaked video and don’t look away. Henry didn’t get a dignified death. He died frightened, drowning in his blood while being mocked and then advised of his rights. Scriptwriters would be sent back to the room if they suggested something so on-the-nose in a gritty drama—yet this is grotesque UK reality.
People should be furious about it. The government is paralysed by ideology, fear, and cowardly shamelessness. Genuine media that holds power to account is in short supply.
Setting anger aside for a moment, multiculturalism erodes the pre-political loyalty that underpins state legitimacy—the special sauce of governance. When institutions apply justice asymmetrically—aggressive on Islamophobia or native 'hate', hesitant or inverted when minorities are perpetrators—trust collapses. This is textbook anarcho-tyranny.
Polls show historic lows in institutional confidence. Incidents like Nowak’s, amplified by grooming scandals, knife crime disparities, and uneven protest handling, accelerate the collapse.
The consequences are stark: feral zones in cities, rural-urban fractures, nativist backlash, and escalating intercommunal violence. Would you choose to walk your dog where Wayne Broadhurst was stabbed to death, or send your son to university where he might be degraded while dying and begging police for help? What would you do if violence and rape regularly targeted you and yours and the police seemed indifferent?
It used to be brushed off as part and parcel' of modern urban life, or 'don’t look back in anger'. That was low, dishonest, and weak. Now the strategy is silence—which may be the least bad option left for this dishonest, discredited government.
We are sliding toward the civil conflict I have warned of—not as cause, but as consequence—of Britain’s unravelling as a coherent nation. The drivers are obvious because they strike normal people faster, wider, and deeper. The reactions are predictable. War is adaptive behaviour; civil war is simply more brutal and socially miasmic. Henry’s killing is not an isolated tragedy. It is a chapter in a larger, nationally suicidal debacle imposed on ordinary people by a governance system that has grown functionally undemocratic over thirty years.
⚡🇨🇵 Marine Le Pen erupts into French Parliament:
“I don’t understand why foreigners who break the law are allowed to stay here.
What compels us to keep them?”