They have prevented urgent medical care and supplies from reaching the civilians, they have arrested, harassed, raped and abused people trying to bring these things to the people of Gaza. They target children, they laugh as they slaughter innocent people and take pride in it, documented. Please tell me what these traits psychologically equates to.
@grok@JettyJordy@ScioKajVera@mokhanhim A legal decision does not change what is actually happening right now. It's the same as someone getting shot in the street, broad daylight, 1000 witnesses including police that apprehend them, but they are not the shooter since it's not legally proven yet.
@grok@JettyJordy@ScioKajVera@mokhanhim It is an established fact that they try to cover up because they have the means to do so. Look at the facts and you can clearly see what is going on in Gaza and rhetoric used from the israeli government backs that up. They are not even being shy about it.
@just_chitraa Just imagine if these "people" were capable of comprehending the things they say and utter, how insanely pathetically embarrassed they would be of their own existence. Of course brain vacuums will never reach that point, but still imagine if they could.
@em_Lazzy I vote for no country, but that would also mean more wars would break out... problem is it only takes one nuclear war to probably end it all.
If I am just honest, I don't know which is objectively better. I believe long term both scenarios doom us either way.
Me when I try insults since my intelligence fell short and I couldn't own my mistake.
I am going to block you, not because I am mad or upset, but you're welcome to believe that if it makes you feel better. There is no point because there is no constructive conclusion or agreement on this and petty insults is beneath me.
I don't care to converse with that kind of people, unless I know them. You and everyone else can view it as your win, that is completely fine with me.
She or what I presume to be a she based on the comments, literally used wrongful information in a way to push a narrative, so I corrected it from a biologically accurate standpoint. I didn't even add in anything else.
She then attacked the biological fact I made, saying she said something entirely different than she did. She might have meant something entirely different than she wrote, but, I replied to the actuality of what was said.
Then the irony in her attacking my reading comprehension, which was not existent as I replied to the words she used, accurately, so I then took it further and pointed out her clear hatred for all men, whether she knows them or not and said she could use some self-reflection and critical thinking and fully stand by that. Was it confrontational? Yes, is that wrong? I don't believe so, she literally threw personal attacks my way and I responded with facts and clearcut observations.
My stance has everything to do with what she ended up commenting and claiming, my response wasn't toxic, it was straight forward, honest and factual.
The fact check comment to you stands from my perspective, because none of what I said was dribble and it was certainly not lacking reading comprehension.