JustRight

I'll believe anything no matter how ridiculous it may sound, as long as there is good evidence to support it. A wise man knows he’s the best fool.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @catsu_curry @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos No, this actually proves my point. I too am busy during the week, the fact that it has dragged on for so long proves there isn’t a time limit and we’re just conversing whenever we have time. Using this as an argument now is simply an excuse - a bad one too.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@very_hot_potato @catsu_curry @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos No, an argument is designed to convince you of a point or position. And im curious, where in this thread do you feel I wasn’t considering his point?

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@very_hot_potato @catsu_curry @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos By definition, it is.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos I’ve already made all the arguments, just read the tread. It literally shouldn’t take more than 1-2min tops.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@Stove_J3bs @catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos That’s not what’s happening here.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@Jesus1stSaves @RascalRhett1 Whoever said I was arguing for the morality of late-term abortion? Don’t strawman me. Why would I even bring up the 93% statistics in the first place if I was for late-term abortion? Use your brain.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@TerriGreenUSA @RascalRhett1 You see 93% and you still say "there's plenty of late term abortions". I guess you only hear what you want to hear. Guess what else, a good chunk of the remaning 7% are due to complications.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@Alliwoniswoo @fireflytypefour Not only is the damage ridiculous, but it's auto-aim as well. Whoever designed this character needs to be kicked in their junk.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@FranciscoTS15 @purutrap How so?

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@TravisSimpleton @purutrap They're delusional, but calling them sub-human scum is taking it a step too far. Most of them are just confused mentally unstable people who have bought into an ideology. They're people who need help, and ridiculing them is just going to make the situation worse.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@Mtu530 @purutrap You're a trans woman, not a woman. That would be a contradiction.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@pooltroof @RascalRhett1 They are stages of human development, not stages of "life", " which doesn't even make any sense. An acorn is a stage in the development of an oak tree. It biologically belongs to an oak tree, but it's not yet an oak tree. Same concept.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos You're not really fooling anyone. This is just a long-winded red herring and a dodge.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos Right, I can see that by how many times you've already tried to argue with me. You don't want to argue because you know you're wrong, but you also don't want to admit it. I've also never denied that singular they exists lol

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@7marpp @insanedms You’re in Poland, why do you have a Japanese keyboard?

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@Enrrekme @TheDon_222 @TiffanyxFong Love how you call people retarded for not knowing the difference between a man and a male, yet you yourself is unable to properly define what a man is.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@fOx1257067 Argument from incredulity fallacy.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos This is still an ad hoc fallacy.

"person A already knows who Jeff"
- That's even more reason to use "he" as a pronoun.

"it makes literally zero difference if Person B says he or they"
- It does, and I've explained why. It makes even less sense to use "they" if they know him.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos "he's dead"

The irony. It's obviously relevant; how is it irrelevant? What does him being alive or dead have to do with anything? This is an ad hoc fallacy.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos To clarify further. Singular they/them is only grammatically sound in contexts where the sex of the individual in question is unknown, irrelevant, or deliberately withheld from the listener.

[JustRight @WhenSumIsJusRig]

@catsu_curry @very_hot_potato @Stove_J3bs @ThatNerdyWriter @GoldenChaos I'm saying, from a grammatical standpoint, there is no reason to use "they" in that sentence. In fact, the way you're phrasing it makes it sound like Jeff wasn't the only one who died. The fact that you avoid using "he" makes us assume something happened to other people as well.