I donāt care about your emotional appeal. How do you explain 82% of Gazaās infrastructure being damaged or destroyed while the civilian death toll represents only 1ā2% of the whole population? What displays the deliberate targeting of civilians rather than you chicken head pro palis baselessly asserting intent from the existence of civilian casualties?? If you flip a coin, thereās a 50/50 chance it lands on heads or tails. If the IDF were indiscriminately bombing civilians, why wouldnāt around 50% of Gazaās population be dead or far more considering the density of the area? And if the IDF were deliberately targeting civilians, why wouldnāt the percentage be far higher than 50%? Even if the *civilian only* death toll were 20%, that figure would still be objectively exceptional in the context of Gazaās geographic size, population density, and the complex circumstances of the war overall, but that hypothetical figure doesnāt matter because itās 1-2%.
Gazaās population increase is higher than the population growth rate of China, India, the United States, Canada, most of Europe and South America, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Iran etc⦠That is fucking mind blowing. Gazaās own Ministry of Health recorded 50,227 births against 24,650 total deaths in 2025, thatās two years after constant war in one of the most densely populated areas on earth. Thatās 25,577 more births than deaths and the figure doesnāt even distinguish civilians from combatants. Never once in human history has there been a genocide where there were more than twice as many births as total deaths during the genocide. Fact check that. The intent to destroy a people does not show in the slightest. I can also go on about all the aid, leaflets, evacuations, and humanitarian corridors but I donāt even need to use those talking points to shit on you. Thereās more evidence of genocide in this comment section than anything in Gaza.
You read every single word. According to the Gaza Health Ministry (Hamas), the death toll in Gaza is around 74,000 which is 3% of their whole population, all terrorists, collaborators and unrelated deaths included in the toll. 82% of all infrastructure damaged or destroyed. Letās say 200,000 bombs were dropped on Gaza, if even one single civilian had been killed for every bomb dropped on Gaza, the death toll would be THREE times higher than it is, and thatās according to Hamas statistics⦠That hypothetical is based on bombs ALONE, not ground operations, tanks, apache helicopters, snipers etc⦠Bombs alone⦠Think about the implications of that for a moment. One civilian per bomb is the BARE minimum number, anything higher further proves my point.. There is no genocide in Gaza and itās not even questionable in the slightest bit. Those figures do not establish an intent to physically destroy the population which is what the legal definition of genocide requires to meet its criteria. Genocide on buildings? Maybe. Don't forget what started your fake genocide either. We saw real intent and it didn't come from the Israelis.
Well 50% of Gazaās entire population is under 18, and many, if not most of the active terrorists in Gaza are under 18 themselves⦠Also, since Islam recognizes puberty as a threshold of adulthood, youāll also have to reject the beliefs of 99.9% of Gazans when defining who qualifies as a child. So which definition of āchildā are we using exactly? 99.9% of Gaza considers a six year old to be an adult but when casualty figures are discussed suddenly everyone under 18 is a child? Gazans believe that raping a nine year old is fine if sheās hit puberty, but when they slaughter Israelis with blatant genocidal intent, then hide behind a nine year old as a human shield who dies in Israelās response, itās genocide? Get the fuck out of here. If the IDF genuinely kills children indiscriminately, why would Hamas, one of many terrorist organizations in Gaza deliberately position itself among them? What strategic advantage would civilian proximity provide if Israel made no distinction between civilians and combatants? Youāre already accusing Israel of deliberately targeting children when they donāt, so objectively speaking, wouldnāt carpet bombing Gaza into dust serve Israelās military objectives more effectively without altering its reputation on the world stage?
Why are you selectively citing the number of IDF soldiers killed on October 7th while comparing it to the entire death toll in Gaza that includes all terrorists rather than applying the same standard of comparison to both? Gazaās death toll is still remarkably low in the context of the scale and duration of the war but that still doesnāt justify conflating civilians with combatants⦠More importantly, an IDF soldier is not inherently a terrorist or a terrorist sympathizer simply by virtue of serving in the Israeli military.
Did the āpalestiniansā commit genocide on October 7th or did they deliberately kill roughly 1,200 people and only intend to stop at exactly 1,200 in one area? Specific intent is the key legal element of genocide. Itās about what the intent was, not what number they managed to kill that day though it was a massive amount.
@Libiguin@sysqo82@abierkhatib You wonāt explain what constitutes genocide because you know Iāll wipe the floor with your entire argument the moment you try to substantiate it. There is no genocide in Gaza.
Thatās a good way to say a whole lot of nothing. Youāre just stacking academic sounding terminology together in response to my comment trying to appear as if youāre saying something of substance. Itās called sophistry. You pro palis recycle the same baseless assertions and none of you display the mental capacity to articulate a compelling argument in the slightest. Itās all emotional appeal and no logic. It works on the masses because very few people objectively analyze your buzzwords past surface level. Once again, what constitutes a genocide?
@drob256@realjordan_M@OwnRules@allenanalysis So why did Gazans celebrate it and take hostages? And where is the evidence of Israelis using Apache helicopters on their own people?
Got it. Listing authorities and organizations that agree with the same propaganda you fell for doesnāt prove genocide whatsoever. Genocide is a legal determination based on whether the established facts satisfy the specific elements of the legal definition.. Your screenshot is not a substitute for evidence and consensus is not a substitute for proving the elements of genocide⦠Muslims exploit the political sensitivities of liberals through propaganda while embedding themselves within āhumanitarianā organizations. They manufactured a facade of popular consensus through bots and media ecosystems. Thatās why you are so quick to cite an article instead of articulating any answer of substance. It allows you to exploit institutional legitimacy while laundering a political agenda through the emotionally manipulative headlines your hijab ridden organizations pump out. This is called an appeal to authority fallacy but it goes deeper when the authority is infiltrated by the same terrorist sympathizers who āappealā to it.
Why would I need to tell Black people anything when you clearly donāt understand the concept of per capita yourself? You claimed that 6ā9 million Jews were killed throughout recorded history but youāre conflating the victims of a single genocide with centuries of massacres, pogroms, religious persecution and killings under various empires. Then you compare those figures to the cumulative deaths of a religious population that amounts to approximately 2.5 billion today without accounting for the enormous disparity in population size. The 6 million figure was first entered into the official record by Dr. Wilhelm Hƶttl who was a nazi from the intelligence service of the SS.
There are approximately 2.5 billion Christians and 16 million Jews worldwide. You canāt just take raw numbers and conflate them without accounting for population differences and proportional rates.. The Holocaust alone killed a third of the worldās Jewish population and there are still fewer Jews alive today than there were before the Holocaust. Iām not undermining Christian persecution which continues even today in Muslim occupied countries. Iām simply telling you that your numbers lack context and your logic is fundamentally flawed.
@CopperHeadMedia@RickyTheGuido@grok Well thatās certainly one way to deflect from the point. Jews are the most frequently discussed group in religious, political and historical discourse whereas Christians are mentioned far less often in these particular conversations. Youāre repeating baseless talking points.
@DerekAd24293438@fk_rachel57399@TCNetwork Saudis are Muslim retard, thatās where Islam came from⦠Muslims invaded and killed millions around the world to colonize and āsettle.ā You Malaysians are the only retards who willingly converted to Islam.