Psalm 37:12–13 (KJV) “The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is comi
@Big_Kirbs@InsightSurge Him admitting that he's actually Indian would completely disregard everything that he said online. What's so funny? It is he's following another Indian dude. This fat **** is crazy.
Look, I know it's you. You can act like it's not. That's fine. Whatever makes you sleep at night. But you know and I know that this fat **** ugly **** **** **** **** is you. Is Colaba ready about your job? Your job is gone. I've. I've been talking to managers. You're done. You're gonna lose everything and you won't be prosperous. So say what you want. Keep up your appearance.
@Stu_No_Gotz@isailinares6@SeeRacists I’m going to say you should take time to pray for your heart and soul. I’m sorry that Black people have upset you so deeply, and I hope you can find it in yourself to forgive them for making you feel vulnerable.
It is fascinating to see such a curated, one sided summary of an ongoing murder trial being presented as if it were the final, objective truth. The text you shared relies entirely on cherry-picked witness testimony from the prosecution’s side, while conveniently ignoring the reality that this is a complex, active legal case with conflicting accounts and ongoing defense arguments.
Framing a confrontation of this magnitude as a simple '15+ times ask to leave' scenario completely strips away the essential context of the trial, including the defense's position on the physical threat felt by the defendant and the dynamics between the individuals involved. Using a handful of selected soundbites to declare someone guilty before the trial has concluded isn't seeking facts—it’s narrative-building designed to avoid the nuance of the evidence.
This trial is about justice, not social media talking points. When you ignore the defense's perspective and the totality of the evidence shown in court, you aren't debating the facts; you are choosing to prioritize your own biases over the legal process. Let the court decide based on the full body of evidence, not the incomplete summaries you've chosen to fixate on.
It is fascinating to see such a curated, one sided summary of an ongoing murder trial being presented as if it were the final, objective truth. The text you shared relies entirely on cherry-picked witness testimony from the prosecution’s side, while conveniently ignoring the reality that this is a complex, active legal case with conflicting accounts and ongoing defense arguments.
Framing a confrontation of this magnitude as a simple '15+ times ask to leave' scenario completely strips away the essential context of the trial, including the defense's position on the physical threat felt by the defendant and the dynamics between the individuals involved. Using a handful of selected soundbites to declare someone guilty before the trial has concluded isn't seeking facts—it’s narrative-building designed to avoid the nuance of the evidence.
This trial is about justice, not social media talking points. When you ignore the defense's perspective and the totality of the evidence shown in court, you aren't debating the facts; you are choosing to prioritize your own biases over the legal process. Let the court decide based on the full body of evidence, not the incomplete summaries you've chosen to fixate on.
Google that username @isailinares6 and enclose it with the double quotes. This tells the search engine to look for that exact phrase, filtering out irrelevant pages that only include part of the phrase. This will reveal his entire identity, everything he's ever done, his social media. Phone numbers. I already have access to his social media.
Google that username @isailinares6 and enclose it with the double quotes. This tells the search engine to look for that exact phrase, filtering out irrelevant pages that only include part of the phrase. This will reveal his entire identity, everything he's ever done, his social media. Phone numbers. I already have access to his social media.
@SeeRacists WP have always tried to cause confusion and chaos in these situations. They make false equivalences like between Chud and Karmelo. They have ALWAYS done this even when it's clear cut. They want to be able to k*ll us with impunity and remove our right to defend ourselves.