Simon Whitehead

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide When are you going to provide a paper that gives evidence for the isolation of a "virus", and is the sole cause of a disease with a specific set of symptoms!

Still waiting!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@CarlSmytheCells Is it "resistance" to drugs, or that they just don't work! Please show a paper to demonstrate the "resistance" factor, Mr Professor. Show the evidence not just rhetoric!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@CarlSmytheCells Talking of old trivia! When will you show a paper that gives evidence for the isolation of a "virus" called SARS-CoV-2 and is the sole cause of a disease called COVID-19 with a specific set of symptoms. It has been a good 6 years now! Still waiting!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide @MichaelAArouet A bit like "viruses"!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Still pushing nonsense! The "Giant Easter Isle Nonsense" still can't provide a paper where they can show the "virus" in the sputum of a sick person is the same after the frankenstien cell culture mess, the same "virus" that causes a spcific disease by a "virus" called SARS-CoV-2

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Still pushing nonsense! The "Giant Easter Isle Nonsense" still can't provide a paper where they can show the "virus" in the sputum of a sick person is the same after the frankenstien cell culture mess, the same "virus" that causes a spcific disease by a "virus" called SARS-CoV-2

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Great more gaslighting! Which means that you can't prove that the "virus" exists in nature!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide No, you are sharing garbage papers that only demonstrate that something can be created in a petri-dish that gets labelled as a "virus". It proves nothing. Until you can prove the "virus" exists in nature, then it is all nonsense.

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Stop making a claim without evidence to back it up!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Great now the gaslighting. This just demonstrates that you can't prove that the "virus" exists in nature!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide No I have shown that the method is flawed. They create something and label it as a "virus".

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Once again, I don't have to tell you how to conduct the experiment. The issue here is that you can't prove the "virus" exists in nature. You only prove that you can create something in a petri-dish and label it as a "virus".

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide I don't have to prove that "viruses" exist. I'm not making a claim here, the onus is on you to provide the evidence.

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide You can't create something in a petri-dish and claim that it is a "virus". That doesn't prove it exists in nature. You must prove the "virus" exists in the sputum of a sick person. You don't by creating something using monkey kidney cells.

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Not avoiding anything. I'm just pointing out the fatal flaw in the experiment for isolating a "virus". Plus I don't need to tell you another method to use. The fact is that you can't prove that the "virus" exists in nature! As you can only create something in a petri-dish!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide The "virus" must exist in nature. Therefore you must be able to isolate the thing directly from the sputum of a sick person. Otherwise, it is just made up nonsense.

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide If the "virus" exists in the sputum of a sick person, then you don't need to create something in a franenstein experiment. You can isolate it directly. Otherwise, you're proving to me that the "virus" doesn't exist in nature. Meaning you have to create it to prove it exists.

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide This truly is a clown world that I live in. The double-speak in this one is strong!

To isolate a "virus" is to create something in a toxic mess!

Oh boy!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide Now you're moving the goal posts to suit your narrative. The "virus" must be shown to exist in nature end of. The only way to do that is to isolate it directly from the sputum of a sick person. Not by creating something in a frankenstein experiment!

[Simon Whitehead @Whitey900]

@Horatioyuletide That is the "spurious" reason as you put it. This is utter garbage, they created something that they claimed to be a "virus". They should be able to isolate it directly from the sputum of a sick person. Not requiring the use of African Green Monkey Kidney cells!