Some people who joined CJP protest:
1) Arundhati Roy, who believes that Kashmir is not a part of India.
2) Colin Gonsalves, who filed a mercy petition for 26/11 terrorist Ajmal Kasab.
3) Prashant Bhushan, who approached Supreme Court at midnight to stop the hanging of terrorist Yakub Memon.
4) Nandita Narain, who sang "Bas naam rahega Allah ka" from CJP stage, a poem by Pakistani poet Faiz Ahmad Faiz.
5) Kunal Kamra, who said from CJP stage - "Yeh log Sita ke Pati ka naam lekar, Nita ke Pati ka kaam kar rahe hain" (They chant the name of Sita's husband, but they serve Nita's husband).
At what point does this even look like a protest against the NEET paper leak? If the objective was truly to seek justice for NEET students, the stage should have been given to the students who were affected by the paper leak, or to the parents whose children lost their lives due to the paper leak. Instead, the platform was given to the Islamo-left ecosystem. It clearly shows the CJP protest organizers' priorities and the real agenda behind the protest.
Sonam Wangchuk should also take a closer look at what is happening around him. He has been reduced to a pawn while others are using his credibility and public image to lend legitimacy to the movement.
A few days ago, Sonam Wangchuk himself remarked from the CJP stage that others were eating at the protest while he was on a hunger strike. He openly expressed disappointment and said - "If you cannot join me in an indefinite hunger strike, at least observe a one-day hunger strike, or skip one meal in solidarity." How many CJP protest organizers acted on his appeal?
He should analyze whether his struggle is being used to advance a broader political or ideological agenda rather than the cause that people believe he is representing, because the CJP protest appears to have become a platform for everything except the NEET paper leak.
@JioCare@reliancejio JioFibre not working since 23rd May 2026.
Service request id SR000036ITCJ.
No response from your team, no engineer visit till date, customer care ends call after keeping on hold.
Pathetic service!!!
@reliancejio@JioCare Jio fibre not working since 23 May 2026.
Service request id SR000036ITCJ.
No response, no engineer visit, No help from Jio customer care.
Pathetic service !!!
We have got my correct answer sheet by CBSE . CBSE officials reached out to us in the evening and has sent my answer sheet, We were correct on our claims and the answer sheet indeed got exchanged .
Amit Shah : Bolo Bharat Mata ki Jai
People : UGC wapas lo
Amit Shah was at a rally in Uttarakhand, he asked people to chant slogans, but they didn't
He even tried Requesting & Soft Threatening, but they still refused
BJPs downfall is started 💀
अगर मोदीजी अपने तलवों में साइनाइड लगाकर सो जाएँ, तो अगली सुबह निशिकांत दुबे ज़हरखुरानी के साथ ICU में भर्ती मिलेंगे, और सुधांशु त्रिवेदी आज तक पर यह समझाते दिखेंगे कि, सुनिए, निशिकांत जी को साइनाइड पॉइज़निंग कैसे हुई, यह ज़रूरी नहीं है; ज़रूरी यह है कि साइनाइड की खोज महाभारत काल में सायन ऋषि ने शुर्पारक राज्य में की थी। जो आज का मुंबई है, उसे महाभारत काल में शुर्पारक कहा जाता था, जो भगवान परशुराम की नगरी थी।
अभी तो और सुनिए, महाभारत में जो ज़हर-बुझे तीर बताए गए हैं, उनमें भी सायन ऋषि का बनाया हुआ साइनाइड ही लगा होता था। अंत में एक बात और देखिए, देखना आप चौंक जाइएगा, मुंबई में आज जो हम सायन इलाका देखते हैं, वह भी सायन ऋषि के नाम पर ही रखा गया था।
*तालियां और आंखों से बिजलियां*
BREAKING: Bill tabled in Parliament making it mandatory for the President, the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice, and all their near and dear ones to be treated for their medical needs and emergencies only by doctors who obtained -40 marks out of 800 in NEET-PG medical exam.
You are right. No one will misuse this law. Instead, they will use it. Because you can only misuse a just and moral law, not an unjust and immoral one. And you have drafted the latter.
Some of us were hoping that this govt would bring reforms to prevent the misuse of the SC/ST Atrocities Act. Lol, they have gone a hundred times harsher by bringing in the so-called UGC equity regulations.
It is the BJP equivalent of Congress’s communal violence bill. It's meant to prevent caste-based discrimination on university campuses, in which only SC, ST, OBCs, and women can be victims. If a reserved-category student calls a general-category student a casteist slur, it is not an offence. A general-category person can only and only be a culprit, never a victim.
The scope for misuse is obvious and dangerous. Personal grudges, relationship rejection, academic failure, everything can be weaponised. Proof is optional. False complaints carry no consequences. And even after due process, the complainant can still claim that they didn’t get justice because of their caste and turn out to be an even bigger victim.
The most baffling part is that universities in India have functioned for decades without this intrusive policing. With rare exceptions, students across castes study together, socialise freely, and coexist without friction. There was no mass demand, no nationwide student movement, no protests asking for this law. So why impose it? When something is largely working, reckless overregulation doesn’t fix problems; it creates new ones.
Why is your government doing this @narendramodi? Please take this back.
You can leave the job of checking other MPs’ MPLADS records to @YTKDIndia. They’ve already checked the Prime Minister’s data—and it’s fully updated, with proper details and photos.
So the real questions are for you:
If the Prime Minister’s MPLADS data can be updated properly,
why isn’t yours?
If the system works at the top,
why does it fail only in your case?
Have you ever called the nodal officer to ask why your records are incomplete?
Or does no one bother once the money is released?
Who is responsible for updating your MPLADS data—
the officer, the ministry, or you?
And if payments are shown as “successful,”
why are works still not marked completed?
Why are completion photos missing?
Why is there no public explanation?
This isn’t about technical glitches.
It’s about effort, follow-up, and accountability.
When data can be clean and transparent for one MP,
there is no excuse for opacity from others.