@Dad_2_The_Bone Kyle shot dead a pedophile who attacked first then tried grabbing his rifle. He shot dead a domestic abuser who attacked him with a skateboard and tried stealing his rifle. He shot and wounded a third man who aimed a loaded handgun at him.
His rifle was legal there, too.
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox@ITzCharl13 You replied then blocked right after, but I'll just respond anyway...
You were talking about the USA. I mentioned USA early into the convo and you never corrected, but rather explicitly said I am wrong.
You're just hiding behind "Not even talking about USA"...
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox That's good information, but that does not make me incorrect because I am talking about USA.
While I was talking about USA, you said I am incorrect. So am I incorrect or correct?
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox Which country are you referring to?
Also, if you are not talking about USA, how can you still say I am incorrect despite me talking about USA where this is the truth?
What was I ever incorrect about then?
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox No, it's not a coincidence. It's just people disagreeing.
The truth is the truth, whether we like it or not. I am just the messenger.
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox No, Wikipedia is not saying exactly what you are saying.
Your interpretation of rape by deception by the wiki article is incorrect. Again, that's not my opinion. I am not making this up.
You are literally incorrect to call fraud in the inducement rape in US.
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox It's not my truth. It's the law.
Again, you can search it up for yourself.
Specifically, Google: "Is rape by deception constituted by fraud in the inducement in the USA"
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox I don't think you want the truth.
This is quite literally not my opinion. Fraud in the inducement is not rape in the US.
Rape by deception isn't constituted by fraud in the inducement, making it not rape. Again, it can be illegal, but not *rape*.
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox People disagreeing with me does not make me incorrect, it just means people disagree.
You can search it up yourself, you know.
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox I did acknowledge facts said by Wikipedia.
Here's me acknowledging again. Your screenshot, rape by deception, isn't constituted by fraud in the inducement, just like I said earlier.
Meaning lying for sex isn't rape. Literally. That's not my opinion at all or interpretation.
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox No. It "literally" isn't rape.
Fraud in the inducement isn't rape under US law. It can be illegal, but not *rape*. Would you like to fact check me here?
@ITzCharl13@jujujuicebbox Lying to someone for sex isn't rape. That's fraud in the inducement, not fraud in the factum.
It's only rape if the nature of the act was lied about, not if the inducement was deceptive.