@j3nnyb00m@vmas Shes been a dirty spank as long as ive been alive. I remember in the 90s Dennis Rodman was on Oprah I think. He said when it was getting to be business first thing he thought was damm, I def ain't the first one who been here before
In all my years working in the medical field, I have personally encountered postpartum psychosis only twice, and I will never forget either case. It is terrifying.
One of those women had driven off a bridge with her baby strapped into the car seat in the back. When she came into the ER, she simply told us what she had done. There was no visible guilt, horror, or emotional reaction. It was almost completely matter-of-fact: “I drove off the bridge.” She seemed able to tell us the facts, but she did not seem to comprehend the meaning or consequence of what she had done. That was what was so disturbing about it. The baby, thankfully, was fine, and she was physically able to talk to us, but mentally she seemed profoundly disconnected from the reality of what had just happened.
The other woman was hospitalized because the people around her could clearly see that something was terribly wrong.
So I am not someone who doubts that postpartum psychosis is real. I have seen it with my own eyes, and it is frightening.
That is exactly why the Lindsay Clancy case is so difficult for me to reconcile.
If the evidence shows that she deliberately arranged for her husband to leave the house because she already knew what she intended to do, then that appears to involve planning: anticipating an opportunity, creating that opportunity, waiting until he was gone, and then carrying out the acts.
So where, exactly, does the psychosis enter into that sequence?
Was she lucid while planning it and sending him away, and then suddenly psychotic once the door closed? Premeditation first and psychosis second? That is the part that simply does not make sense to me.
And then there were three children. Even if I accept that she could have been profoundly psychotic with the first, I struggle to understand how the reality of what she had just done—seeing her own child, experiencing the physical act, and then moving on to another child and then another—never produced even one moment of recognition or insight.
Then she went to the window and jumped. I do not think that act alone proves lucidity; a profoundly mentally ill person can attempt suicide. But taken together with the apparent planning and the sequence of events, it leaves me with serious questions about how impaired her awareness actually was throughout the entire episode.
I have seen postpartum psychosis. I know how devastating and real it can be. And what I witnessed looked very different: a woman could tell us what she had done, yet seemed completely disconnected from the emotional and moral reality of it.
That is where I remain stuck with this case. She may absolutely have suffered from postpartum psychosis. But if she could formulate a plan, create the opportunity to carry it out, act against three children, and then attempt to take her own life afterward, I have a very difficult time understanding how there could have been no meaningful awareness of what she was doing from beginning to end.
The result: three children are dead at the hands of their mother. There have to be consequences as severe as the horrific act.
A damning new public records request shows that Greg Connor was very involved in the Karen Read prosecution, and he lied about it. 🗣
In February 2026, when he announced his run for District Attorney, Norfolk County Chief Trial Counsel Greg Connor said he had no involvement in the Karen Read case or the murder investigation into John O’Keefe. He even pointed to the fact that Hank Brennan was brought in as a special prosecutor for the second trial, as if that cleared him completely.
Spoiler: It doesn’t.
Because if Connor truly had nothing to do with this case, especially the second prosecution, then why are there 7,428 emails after the July 2024 mistrial? That is not a small number. That is not someone on the sidelines. That is someone actively involved.
We already saw him sitting in the courtroom during trial one, taking notes. At the time, it seemed minimal. Now it looks like that was just what was visible. The emails tell a much bigger story, and it directly contradicts what he told the public.
This is a major credibility problem for Connor. You cannot say you had no involvement when the records suggest the opposite. 🤯
Connor held a public-facing role and his communications are subject to public records laws. He knew that. Which makes this even worse, because it shows a willingness to say one thing publicly while doing another behind the scenes.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Connor is shaping up to be Morrissey 2.0. If people are not paying attention when they vote, we will see more Karen Read’s in the future.
@lindseygaetani As a random guy who never spoke to you, and will never meet you, I say you have a fantastic body...I hope you get to settle in your life away from.drama soon enough.